Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › KRUS Kura Sushi USA, Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. Class AKRUSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants
Momentum laggard 5
Mkt cap
$333M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.16M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
275.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-9.9 pp
WACC 9.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
67 days
12 Jan 2027
Close · USD$27.38
1D-26.1%
1W-21.7%
1M-31.4%
3M-43.6%
6M-52.2%
YTD-47.7%
1Y-53.5%
ATR %9.4%
Beta0.85
52w lowhigh66.1% off high

What Kura Sushi USA does

Employees: 3,900

Kura Sushi USA at a glance

Size Kura Sushi USA (KRUS) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $333M, the 3024th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $27.38 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 52.2%, against +1.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 18.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is -0.9% (peer median 5.4%).

Valuation It trades at 275.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.2× (2nd most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.9 points below its cost of capital (9.3% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 15.4% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101KRUS 49
Six months, rebased to 100: Kura Sushi USA against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kura Sushi USA financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-08-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$319M$283M$238M$187M$141M
Revenue growth—+19%+27%+33%—
Gross profit$35.5M$33.0M$29.1M$28.4M$21.5M
EBITDA$13.8M$11.6M$7.29M$8.16M$8.05M
Net income-$2.08M-$1.90M-$8.80M$1.50M-$764,000
Free cash flow-$25.0M-$21.5M-$28.6M-$21.0M-$3.07M
Capital expenditure$54.9M$48.3M$44.5M$40.8M$27.7M
Total debt$208M$171M$142M$120M$90.8M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kura Sushi USA competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%+20%6831NREST9828741224081D0275282000021868160SLIGRLOCODIN0341605108816327057883453340KRUS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kura Sushi USA is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×500×1,000×6831NREST982824081D0275327528160SLIGRDIN0341KRUSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kura Sushi USA is the large dot.

Kura Sushi USA competitors and peer comparison

How Kura Sushi USA compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kura Sushi USA against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKRUSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-31.4%-0.9%lowest of 21
6-month return-52.2%+1.5%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-66.1%-17.3%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+18.4%+5.5%5th highest of 21
Operating margin-0.9%5.4%lowest of 21
Forward P/E275.2×14.2×2nd most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.9 pp+2.4 pplowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA11.9×0.8×most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kura Sushi USA KRUSUnited States$333M-52%+18%-1%275.2×n/an/a
Green Tea 6831.HKHong Kong$332M-59%+24%13%3.7×-21.0%+24.0%
Nordrest NREST.STSweden$334M-24%+34%8%14.2×-8.2%+28.2%
Genki Global Dining Concepts 9828.TJapan$336M+8%+29%5%13.8×2.3%+14.0%
ATOM 7412.TJapan$353M-56%-10%0%n/an/an/a
Guangzhou Xiao Noodles Catering Management 2408.HKHong Kong$354M-7%+41%10%12.9×-7.3%+53.5%
Kimly 1D0.SISingapore$361M-11%+1%14%10.6×-7.9%+8.9%
Bafang Yunji International 2753.TWTaiwan$371M-1%+7%13%12.6×-7.6%+11.1%
Fujio Food 2752.TJapan$372M+4%+2%2%951.7×n/an/a
Ringer Hut 8200.TJapan$392M+9%+2%4%n/a15.8%+5.8%
China Quanjude (Group) 002186.SZChina$416M-15%-4%0%n/a16.4%+9.9%
Kisoji 8160.TJapan$438M+6%+2%5%32.9×4.4%+11.9%
Sligro Food SLIGR.ASNetherlands$444M-28%-4%1%25.2×3.4%+6.5%
El Pollo Loco LOCOUnited States$453M+6%+4%10%14.4×3.2%+2.8%
Dine Brands Global DINUnited States$454M+26%+8%14%7.9×n/an/a
Cafe de Coral 0341.HKHong Kong$464M+61%-4%4%14.7×-9.1%+4.0%
Tongqinglou Catering 605108.SSChina$473M-24%+4%6%30.7×n/an/a
Srs 8163.TJapan$474M+53%+10%4%43.0×9.6%+11.8%
OOTOYA 2705.TJapan$477M+53%+18%6%n/a10.0%+18.1%
Feastogether 7883.TWOTaiwan$479M-9%+10%9%n/a-0.2%+27.9%
Hyundai Green Food 453340.KSSouth Korea$482M+22%+7%5%6.2×-18.0%+6.6%

Questions

Which companies are Kura Sushi USA's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Green Tea (6831.HK), Nordrest (NREST.ST), Genki Global Dining Concepts (9828.T), ATOM (7412.T), Guangzhou Xiao Noodles Catering Management (2408.HK), Kimly (1D0.SI), Bafang Yunji International (2753.TW), Fujio Food (2752.T).
Is Kura Sushi USA expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 275.2× against a peer median of 14.2×, 2nd most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Kura Sushi USA stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -52.2% against +1.5% for the median peer; over one year -53.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.