Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7883.TWO Feastogether Group Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Feastogether Group Co. Ltd.7883.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants
Momentum strong 79
Mkt cap
$479M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$454,994
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+8.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-28 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · TWDNT$264.00
1D-7.0%
1W-5.7%
1M-0.9%
3M+10.5%
6M-9.0%
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %6.8%
52w lowhigh35.5% off high

What Feastogether does

No business profile yet.

Feastogether at a glance

Size Feastogether (7883.TWO) is a Taiwan Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $479M, the 460th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$264.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.0%, against +4.4% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.2%); the operating margin is 8.7% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 1.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +28%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.7 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1047883.TWO 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Feastogether against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Feastogether financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenuen/aNT$11.7BNT$10.6BNT$8.59BNT$5.59B
Revenue growth—+10%+23%+54%—
Gross profitn/aNT$4.35BNT$3.88BNT$3.16BNT$1.76B
EBITDAn/aNT$2.10BNT$1.21BNT$910MNT$629M
Net incomen/aNT$745MNT$145MNT$103MNT$54.8M
Free cash flown/aNT$933MNT$800M-NT$321MNT$180M
Capital expendituren/aNT$959MNT$857MNT$2.25BNT$532M
Total debtNT$4.80BNT$4.11BNT$4.61BNT$5.09BNT$3.68B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Feastogether competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%+40%27054533408163605108742103419900MARSPTLODINLOCOSLIGR8160EAT2157BRCBELIOR140527277883.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Feastogether is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%1×2×3×27054533408163605108742103419900MARSPTLODINLOCOSLIGR8160000721EAT2157BRCBELIOR140527277883.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Feastogether is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%2705453340816374210341MARSLOCO0007212157140527277883.TWOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Feastogether is the large dot.

Feastogether competitors and peer comparison

How Feastogether compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Feastogether against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7883.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.9%+7.9%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-9.0%+4.4%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-35.5%-12.8%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.4%+4.2%5th highest of 21
Operating margin8.7%5.1%5th highest of 21
EV / Sales1.6×1.1×9th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.2%4.7%6th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+27.9%+9.5%3rd highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-28.1 pp-6.9 pp3rd least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.7 pp-0.0 pp4th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.8×10.0×8th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA1.3×2.2×9th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Feastogether 7883.TWOTaiwan$479M-9%+10%9%1.6×-0.2%+27.9%
OOTOYA 2705.TJapan$477M+53%+18%6%1.9×10.0%+18.1%
Hyundai Green Food 453340.KSSouth Korea$482M+22%+7%5%0.3×-18.0%+6.6%
Srs 8163.TJapan$474M+53%+10%4%1.0×9.6%+11.8%
Tongqinglou Catering 605108.SSChina$473M-24%+4%6%2.2×n/an/a
Kappa.create 7421.TJapan$489M+3%-1%-1%1.1×29.8%+2.4%
Cafe de Coral 0341.HKHong Kong$464M+61%-4%4%0.5×-9.1%+4.0%
Sagami 9900.TJapan$494M+13%+10%7%1.9×7.7%+14.1%
Marston's MARS.LUnited Kingdom$497M+23%-1%22%1.8×-2.5%+11.7%
Portillo's PTLOUnited States$504M+54%+3%6%1.6×n/an/a
Dine Brands Global DINUnited States$454M+26%+8%14%2.1×n/an/a
El Pollo Loco LOCOUnited States$453M+6%+4%10%1.3×3.2%+2.8%
Sligro Food SLIGR.ASNetherlands$444M-28%-4%1%0.3×3.4%+6.5%
Kisoji 8160.TJapan$438M+6%+2%5%1.1×4.4%+11.9%
Xi'an Catering 000721.SZChina$523M-20%-14%-23%8.2×50.5%+6.5%
AmRest EAT.WAPoland$529M-5%-3%4%0.8×5.1%+9.9%
Koshidaka 2157.TJapan$530M-6%+16%13%1.1×-9.8%+31.1%
Black Rock Coffee Bar BRCBUnited States$538M-6%+24%3%3.4×n/an/a
Elior ELIOR.PAFrance$544M-35%0%2%0.3×6.3%+9.2%
DPC Dash 1405.HKHong Kong$548M-34%+26%4%0.9×6.6%+36.3%
Wowprime 2727.TWTaiwan$550M-1%+10%8%0.7×-11.9%+9.0%

Questions

Which companies are Feastogether's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: OOTOYA (2705.T), Hyundai Green Food (453340.KS), Srs (8163.T), Tongqinglou Catering (605108.SS), Kappa.create (7421.T), Cafe de Coral (0341.HK), Sagami (9900.T), Marston's (MARS.L).
Is Feastogether expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.6× against a peer median of 1.1×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +28%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Feastogether stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.0% against +4.4% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.