Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8200.T Ringer Hut Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Ringer Hut Co., Ltd.8200.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants
Momentum strong 75
Mkt cap
$392M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
83%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.34M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+0.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
+10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
63 days
8 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥2,410
1D-3.0%
1W+1.6%
1M+5.6%
3M+4.8%
6M+8.7%
YTD+5.3%
1Y+5.3%
ATR %1.9%
52w lowhigh3.2% off high

What Ringer Hut does

Employees: 587

Ringer Hut at a glance

Size Ringer Hut (8200.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $392M, the 1196th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,410 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.7%, against -3.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.0%); the operating margin is 3.8% (peer median 5.4%).

Valuation It trades at 1.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.5× (11th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20268200.T 109Peer median 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Ringer Hut against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ringer Hut financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-02-28. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥46.0B¥45.1B¥43.8B¥40.2B¥37.7B
Revenue growth—+3%+9%+7%—
Gross profit¥30.4B¥28.1B¥27.5B¥25.5B¥23.2B
EBITDA¥3.89B¥3.50B¥3.65B¥2.88B¥1.57B
Net income¥1.88B¥1.73B¥969M¥752M-¥403M
Free cash flown/a¥1.02B¥889M¥972M-¥540M
Capital expendituren/a¥1.95B¥2.23B¥1.96B¥2.07B
Total debt¥8.51B¥7.87B¥8.26B¥8.78B¥9.71B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ringer Hut competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%+20%275227530021861D0240874128160SLIGRDIN9828KRUS68310341605108816327054533408200.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ringer Hut is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%1×2×275227530021861D0240874128160SLIGRLOCODIN9828NRESTKRUS683103416051088163270578834533408200.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ringer Hut is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%0%25%50%27530021861D024088160SLIGRLOCO9828NREST6831816378834533408200.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Ringer Hut is the large dot.

Ringer Hut competitors and peer comparison

How Ringer Hut compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ringer Hut against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8200.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.6%-1.8%7th highest of 21
6-month return+8.7%-3.9%6th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-3.2%-19.7%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.3%+7.0%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin3.8%5.4%8th lowest of 21
EV / Sales1.5×1.5×11th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.8%-0.2%2nd most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.8%+11.8%3rd lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.1 pp-13.1 ppmost demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.8 pp+2.4 pp8th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA17.3×10.0×2nd most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×0.8×8th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Ringer Hut 8200.TJapan$392M+9%+2%4%1.5×15.8%+5.8%
Fujio Food 2752.TJapan$372M+4%+2%2%1.8×n/an/a
Bafang Yunji International 2753.TWTaiwan$371M-1%+7%13%1.4×-7.6%+11.1%
China Quanjude (Group) 002186.SZChina$416M-15%-4%0%2.4×16.4%+9.9%
Kimly 1D0.SISingapore$361M-11%+1%14%1.7×-7.9%+8.9%
Guangzhou Xiao Noodles Catering Management 2408.HKHong Kong$354M-7%+41%10%1.5×-7.3%+53.5%
ATOM 7412.TJapan$353M-56%-10%0%1.9×n/an/a
Kisoji 8160.TJapan$438M+6%+2%5%1.1×4.4%+11.9%
Sligro Food SLIGR.ASNetherlands$444M-28%-4%1%0.3×3.4%+6.5%
El Pollo Loco LOCOUnited States$453M+6%+4%10%1.3×3.2%+2.8%
Dine Brands Global DINUnited States$454M+26%+8%14%2.1×n/an/a
Genki Global Dining Concepts 9828.TJapan$336M+8%+29%5%0.9×2.3%+14.0%
Nordrest NREST.STSweden$334M-24%+34%8%1.2×-8.2%+28.2%
Kura Sushi USA KRUSUnited States$333M-52%+18%-1%1.6×n/an/a
Green Tea 6831.HKHong Kong$332M-59%+24%13%0.5×-21.0%+24.0%
Cafe de Coral 0341.HKHong Kong$464M+61%-4%4%0.5×-9.1%+4.0%
Tongqinglou Catering 605108.SSChina$473M-24%+4%6%2.2×n/an/a
Srs 8163.TJapan$474M+53%+10%4%1.0×9.6%+11.8%
OOTOYA 2705.TJapan$477M+53%+18%6%1.9×10.0%+18.1%
Feastogether 7883.TWOTaiwan$479M-9%+10%9%1.6×-0.2%+27.9%
Hyundai Green Food 453340.KSSouth Korea$482M+22%+7%5%0.3×-18.0%+6.6%

Questions

Which companies are Ringer Hut's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Fujio Food (2752.T), Bafang Yunji International (2753.TW), China Quanjude (Group) (002186.SZ), Kimly (1D0.SI), Guangzhou Xiao Noodles Catering Management (2408.HK), ATOM (7412.T), Kisoji (8160.T), Sligro Food (SLIGR.AS).
Is Ringer Hut expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.5× against a peer median of 1.5×, 11th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Ringer Hut stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.7% against -3.9% for the median peer; over one year +5.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.