Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › IQMX.HE IQM Quantum Computers Oyj Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

IQM Quantum Computers Oyj Class AIQMX.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Information Technology›Computer Processing Hardware

Builds superconducting quantum computers and sells quantum computing systems and access to research and industry.

Mkt cap
$1.41B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$1.02M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-41.3 pp
WACC 14.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€6.67
1D-4.2%
1W-14.1%
1M-28.0%
3M-18.0%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %7.1%
52w lowhigh66.7% off high

What IQM Quantum Computers does

Builds superconducting quantum computers and sells quantum computing systems and access to research and industry.

Sold system by system, usually to national research centres and governments that install a machine on site, so revenue is lumpy and rests on a small number of large orders. Maintenance contracts and cloud access add recurring revenue. Public research funding is the main buyer budget.

Products and services

  • Superconducting quantum computers
  • Quantum computing cloud/access services

Customers

  • Research institutions/universities
  • Governments (national quantum computing centers)
  • Enterprises exploring quantum computing

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Deep tech / computing hardware
  • Quantum computing
  • Full-stack quantum computer…

What could go right

  • Government/national quantum computing infrastructure investment
  • Enterprise quantum computing pilot programs

What could go wrong

  • Pre-commercial-scale technology risk
  • Heavy R&D spending relative to revenue

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). Deep engineering know-how in superconducting qubit hardware, an early, high-barrier field.

Headquarters: Espoo, Finland · Founded: 2018

Named competitors

IQM Quantum Computers at a glance

Size IQM Quantum Computers (IQMX.HE) is a Finland Information Technology company (Computer Processing Hardware) with a market value of $1.41B, the 29th largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €6.67 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth The operating margin is -492.1% (peer median 7.2%).

Valuation It trades at 174.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 41.3 points below its cost of capital (14.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

IQM Quantum Computers financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024
Revenue€6.68M€0€0
Revenue growth———
Gross profit€3.06M€0€0
EBITDAn/a-€331,570-€1,000
Net income-€32.7M€3.77M-€1,005
Free cash flow-€57.1M€13,140€0
Capital expenditure€7.18M€0€0
Total debt€28.6M€0€0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

IQM Quantum Computers competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (IQMX.HE vs IBM vs IONQ vs RGTI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
IQM Quantum Computers IQMX.HE$1.41Bn/an/a-492%174.7×n/a
IBM IBM$232B+6%+7%21%4.1×7.6%
IonQ IONQ$14.0B-34%+371%-392%48.5×n/a
RGTI RGTI$3.92B-38%+68%-728%264.8×n/a
QBTS QBTS$4.05B-25%-44%-1,373%286.2×n/a

How IQM Quantum Computers compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

IQM Quantum Computers against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIQMX.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-28.0%-1.7%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-66.7%-41.8%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin-492.1%7.2%2nd lowest of 20
EV / Sales174.7×1.9×2nd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-41.3 pp+2.2 pp2nd lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
IQM Quantum Computers IQMX.HEFinland$1.41Bn/an/a-492%174.7×n/an/a
SDIC Intelligence Information Technology 300188.SZChina$1.35B-15%-15%-53%6.2×n/an/a
IQM Quantum Computers Oyj Sponsored ADR IQMXUnited States$1.49Bn/an/a-492%178.8×n/an/a
XGD 300130.SZChina$1.49B-20%+21%12%1.7×3.8%+3.8%
Kontron KTN.DEGermany$1.31B-19%-7%7%0.9×4.2%+5.1%
Sichuan Furong Technology 603327.SSChina$1.30B-26%+22%6%3.0×n/an/a
Raspberry PI RPI.LUnited Kingdom$1.29B-27%+71%9%2.9×14.4%+17.2%
Qisda 2352.TWTaiwan$1.28B+7%0%1%0.6×n/an/a
PCI Technology 600728.SSChina$1.58B-7%+11%0%1.1×23.0%+18.8%
MilDef MILDEF.STSweden$1.17B+54%+76%17%4.1×5.1%+38.7%
Willfar Information Technology 688100.SSChina$1.98B-28%-9%20%4.8×17.0%+15.5%
Infleqtion INFQUnited States$2.00B-27%n/a-315%67.0×n/an/a
Dongfang Electronics 000682.SZChina$2.06B-21%+14%7%1.2×8.9%+17.4%
Pasqal PSQLUnited States$923Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Getac 3005.TWTaiwan$2.20B+19%+9%15%1.7×-7.0%+7.2%
Zkteco 301330.SZChina$876M-19%+24%11%1.9×7.2%+3.4%
Lakala Payment 300773.SZChina$2.32B-25%+17%4%1.1×14.2%0.0%
JBCC 9889.TJapan$852M+61%+9%10%1.5×-4.7%+4.8%
Jess-Link Products 6197.TWTaiwan$814M-10%+21%22%3.0×6.1%+16.2%
Emdoor Information 001314.SZChina$791M-26%+74%3%1.0×n/an/a
Toukei Computer 4746.TJapan$790M+74%+5%29%5.6×2.6%+5.6%

Questions

Who are IQM Quantum Computers's main competitors?
Named competitors: IBM Quantum (IBM), IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SDIC Intelligence Information Technology (300188.SZ), IQM Quantum Computers Oyj Sponsored ADR (IQMX), XGD (300130.SZ), Kontron (KTN.DE), Sichuan Furong Technology (603327.SS), Raspberry PI (RPI.L).
Is IQM Quantum Computers expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 174.7× against a peer median of 1.9×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.