Loading…

IonQ, Inc.IONQCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Computer Processing Hardware

US quantum-computing company building trapped-ion quantum computers, accessed via the cloud.

Momentum laggard 16
Mkt cap
$14.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$782M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-79.2 pp
WACC 19.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · USD$32.62
1D+23.4%
1W+8.6%
1M-17.3%
3M-23.3%
6M-33.8%
YTD-27.3%
1Y-41.1%
ATR %8.5%
Beta3.38
52w lowhigh55.7% off high

What IonQ does

US quantum-computing company building trapped-ion quantum computers, accessed via the cloud.

Earns today mainly from a small number of large contracts, such as government research agreements and system sales, rather than steady subscriptions, plus computing time sold through the big cloud platforms. In 2025 it bought several companies, including Oxford Ionics, ID Quantique and Capella Space, to cover networking, sensing and chips as well as computers.

Products and services

  • Quantum computers (Forte, Tempo series)
  • Cloud quantum-computing access (via AWS/Azure/Google)
  • Quantum networking (early stage)

Customers

  • Research institutions, government, enterprises exp

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Computing hardware
  • Quantum computing
  • Trapped-ion quantum hardware plus cloud…

What could go right

  • Government and enterprise quantum R&D funding
  • Cloud quantum-computing partnerships

What could go wrong

  • Pre-commercial revenue, heavy cash burn
  • Technology risk versus superconducting and other approaches

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). Trapped-ion approach offers high qubit fidelity, but commercial quantum advantage is still unproven industry-wide.

Headquarters: College Park, Maryland, US · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 1,132

Named competitors

IonQ at a glance

Size IonQ (IONQ) is a United States Information Technology company (Computer Processing Hardware) with a market value of $14.0B, the 630th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $32.62 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.8%, against +7.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 370.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +28.4%); the operating margin is -392.5% (peer median 3.8%).

Valuation It trades at 48.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.0× (4th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 79.2 points below its cost of capital (19.8% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $1.17B at 30 Sep 2026, up 728% on a year earlier — 3.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 11.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 107IONQ 57
Six months, rebased to 100: IonQ against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

IonQ financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$246M$130M$43.1M$22.0M$11.1M
Revenue growth—+202%+95%+98%—
Gross profit-$81.8M-$29.5M$3.82M$3.56M$2.58M
EBITDA-$813M-$508M-$212M-$147M-$80.1M
Net income-$1.38B-$510M-$332M-$158M-$48.5M
Free cash flow-$572M-$388M-$124M-$92.5M-$54.0M
Capital expenditure$118M$105M$23.6M$19.5M$12.6M
Total debt$54.5M$30.0M$17.7M$8.11M$4.05M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

IonQ competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%0026002395002241ZBRA0009773231603019300857SMCI2357493868878109922356000066002841QBTSRGTIIONQ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. IonQ is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%+400%0×100×200×300×00260023950022413231300857SMCIQNTQBTSRGTIIONQRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. IonQ is the large dot.

IonQ competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (IONQ vs RGTI vs QBTS vs IBM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
IonQ IONQ$14.0B-34%+371%-392%48.5×n/a
RGTI RGTI$3.92B-38%+68%-728%264.8×n/a
QBTS QBTS$4.05B-25%-44%-1,373%286.2×n/a
IBM IBM$232B+6%+7%21%4.1×7.6%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) GOOGL$3.47T-29%+22%33%7.2×18.5%

How IonQ compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

IonQ against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIONQPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.3%-14.1%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-33.8%+7.5%4th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-55.7%-36.1%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+370.6%+28.4%highest of 20
Operating margin-392.5%3.8%4th lowest of 20
EV / Sales48.5×1.0×4th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-79.2 pp+1.1 pplowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
IonQ IONQUnited States$14.0B-34%+371%-392%48.5×n/an/a
Lingyi iTech (Guangdong) 002600.SZChina$14.2B-17%+9%6%1.9×n/an/a
Advantech 2395.TWTaiwan$14.5B+39%+40%19%4.8×9.5%+6.8%
GoerTek 002241.SZChina$13.1B0%-3%2%1.0×n/an/a
Zebra Technologies ZBRAUnited States$15.2B+42%+17%17%2.9×14.8%+4.1%
IEIT SYSTEMS Co., Ltd.Class A 000977.SZChina$12.1B-21%+14%3%0.5×7.7%+21.2%
Wistron 3231.TWTaiwan$16.3B+13%+107%4%0.4×n/an/a
Dawning Information Industry 603019.SSChina$16.8B-17%+32%13%6.0×31.2%+8.0%
Sharetronic Data Technology 300857.SZChina$11.4B-40%+127%21%4.8×n/an/a
Supermicro SMCIUnited States$18.9B-19%+156%9%0.5×n/an/a
Asustek Computer 2357.TWTaiwan$19.3B+55%+32%6%0.8×n/an/a
Quantinuum QNTUnited States$9.89Bn/a+35%-644%336.4×n/an/a
Pegatron 4938.TWTaiwan$7.52B+14%-6%1%0.2×n/an/a
SeeYA Technology 688781.SSChina$7.11B+17%n/an/an/an/an/a
Lenovo 0992.HKHong Kong$30.8B+50%+26%5%0.4×-15.0%+6.6%
Inventec 2356.TWTaiwan$5.71B+12%+16%2%0.3×n/an/a
China Greatwall Technology 000066.SZChina$5.40B-42%+28%-1%2.4×n/an/a
Guangzhou Shiyuan Electronic Technology 002841.SZChina$4.37B+13%+35%8%0.8×-2.7%+7.3%
Compal Electronics 2324.TWTaiwan$4.15B+8%-4%1%0.2×n/an/a
QBTS QBTSUnited States$4.05B-25%-44%-1,373%286.2×n/an/a
RGTI RGTIUnited States$3.92B-38%+68%-728%264.8×n/an/a

IonQ backlog

IonQ reported $1.17B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 728% from a year earlier and up 141% from the previous quarter. That is 3.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 4.93.

Questions

Who are IonQ's main competitors?
Named competitors: Rigetti Computing (RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), IBM (IBM), Alphabet (Google quantum) (GOOGL). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Lingyi iTech (Guangdong) (002600.SZ), Advantech (2395.TW), GoerTek (002241.SZ), Zebra Technologies (ZBRA), IEIT SYSTEMS Co., Ltd.Class A (000977.SZ), Wistron (3231.TW).
Is IonQ expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 48.5× against a peer median of 1.0×, 4th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has IonQ stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.8% against +7.5% for the median peer; over one year -41.1%.
What is IonQ's backlog?
IonQ's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $1.17B at 30 Sep 2026, +728% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.