Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688781.SS SeeYA Technology Corp. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

SeeYA Technology Corp. Class A688781.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Computer Processing Hardware

Chinese maker of OLED microdisplays (OLED-on-silicon) used in VR/AR headsets, camera viewfinders and other near-eye displays.

≈ China's answer to Kopin/eMagin in OLED microdisplaysMomentum leader 98
Mkt cap
$7.11B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$29.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 16.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥47.40
1D-5.0%
1W+17.9%
1M+20.9%
3M+32.2%
6M+17.2%
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %7.6%
52w lowhigh27.1% off high

What SeeYA Technology does

Chinese maker of OLED microdisplays (OLED-on-silicon) used in VR/AR headsets, camera viewfinders and other near-eye displays.

In one line: China's answer to Kopin/eMagin in OLED microdisplays.

Products and services

  • OLEDoS microdisplay panels
  • Microdisplay modules
  • Near-eye display solutions

Customers

  • VR/AR headset makers
  • Camera manufacturers (electronic viewfinders)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors & displays
  • Microdisplays
  • OLED-on-silicon (OLEDoS) panels and…

What could go right

  • VR/AR/mixed-reality headset volume growth

What could go wrong

  • Newly public, unproven scale economics
  • Concentrated, still-nascent VR/AR end market

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how, scale). Capital-intensive OLEDoS fab and process know-how create a real but still-scaling manufacturing barrier.

Headquarters: Hefei, China · Founded: 2016

Named competitors

SeeYA Technology at a glance

Size SeeYA Technology (688781.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Computer Processing Hardware) with a market value of $7.11B, the 351st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥47.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 17.2%, against -7.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 19 in its peer set.

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026688781.SS 111Peer median 91
Six months, rebased to 100: SeeYA Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

SeeYA Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenuen/an/aCN¥280MCN¥215MCN¥190M
Revenue growth——+30%+13%—
Gross profitn/an/a-CN¥1.03M-CN¥22.4M-CN¥16.2M
EBITDAn/an/a-CN¥195M-CN¥263M-CN¥197M
Net incomen/an/a-CN¥247M-CN¥304M-CN¥247M
Free cash flown/an/a-CN¥415M-CN¥542M-CN¥339M
Capital expendituren/an/aCN¥367MCN¥261MCN¥129M
Total debtCN¥1.27Bn/aCN¥601MCN¥385MCN¥404M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SeeYA Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%493823560000663008570028410009772324QBTSRGTI002241NATL2395ZBRAV0332316030193706688781.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SeeYA Technology is the large dot.

SeeYA Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688781.SS vs KOPN vs 6758.T vs 000725.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
SeeYA Technology 688781.SS$7.11B+17%n/an/an/an/a
Kopin KOPN$564M-44%-7%-35%11.8×n/a
Sony 6758.T$156B+33%+1%13%1.9×3.4%
BOE Technology 000725.SZ$25.3B+9%-4%2%1.5×-3.9%

How SeeYA Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SeeYA Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688781.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+20.9%-13.5%highest of 21
6-month return+17.2%-7.9%3rd highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-27.1%-35.8%8th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
SeeYA Technology 688781.SSChina$7.11B+17%n/an/an/an/an/a
Pegatron 4938.TWTaiwan$7.52B+14%-6%1%0.2×n/an/a
Lingyi iTech (Guangdong) 1688.HKHong Kong$5.75Bn/a+14%6%0.9×n/an/a
Inventec 2356.TWTaiwan$5.71B+12%+16%2%0.3×n/an/a
China Greatwall Technology 000066.SZChina$5.40B-42%+28%-1%2.4×n/an/a
Quantinuum QNTUnited States$9.89Bn/a+35%-644%336.4×n/an/a
Sharetronic Data Technology 300857.SZChina$11.4B-40%+127%21%4.8×n/an/a
Guangzhou Shiyuan Electronic Technology 002841.SZChina$4.37B+13%+35%8%0.8×-2.7%+7.3%
IEIT SYSTEMS Co., Ltd.Class A 000977.SZChina$12.1B-21%+14%3%0.5×7.7%+21.2%
Compal Electronics 2324.TWTaiwan$4.15B+8%-4%1%0.2×n/an/a
QBTS QBTSUnited States$4.05B-25%-44%-1,373%286.2×n/an/a
RGTI RGTIUnited States$3.92B-38%+68%-728%264.8×n/an/a
GoerTek 002241.SZChina$13.1B0%-3%2%1.0×n/an/a
IonQ IONQUnited States$14.0B-34%+371%-392%48.5×n/an/a
NCR Atleos NATLUnited States$3.49B+7%+2%14%1.3×-9.2%+1.8%
Advantech 2395.TWTaiwan$14.5B+39%+40%19%4.8×9.5%+6.8%
Zebra Technologies ZBRAUnited States$15.2B+42%+17%17%2.9×14.8%+4.1%
Venture V03.SISingapore$3.22B-21%+1%10%1.1×-1.3%-3.4%
Wistron 3231.TWTaiwan$16.3B+13%+107%4%0.4×n/an/a
Dawning Information Industry 603019.SSChina$16.8B-17%+32%13%6.0×31.2%+8.0%
MiTAC 3706.TWTaiwan$2.98B-16%+44%4%0.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are SeeYA Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kopin (KOPN), Sony (microdisplay unit) (6758.T), BOE Technology (000725.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Pegatron (4938.TW), Lingyi iTech (Guangdong) (1688.HK), Inventec (2356.TW), China Greatwall Technology (000066.SZ), Quantinuum (QNT), Sharetronic Data Technology (300857.SZ).
How has SeeYA Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +17.2% against -7.9% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.