Loading…

QBTSQBTSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Computer Processing Hardware

US-Canadian quantum-computing company selling quantum annealing systems and cloud access for optimization problems.

Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$4.05B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$174M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-39.5 pp
WACC 16.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · USD$10.68
1D+18.0%
1W+0.3%
1M-26.9%
3M-43.9%
6M-25.1%
YTD-59.2%
1Y-68.8%
ATR %8.8%
Beta3.98
52w lowhigh77.2% off high

What QBTS does

US-Canadian quantum-computing company selling quantum annealing systems and cloud access for optimization problems.

Earns mostly from subscriptions to its cloud service, with occasional larger sales of machines installed on a customer's own site. Revenue is still small against its research spending, so the business is funded by share sales. Went public through a 2022 merger with a blank-cheque company.

Products and services

  • Advantage quantum annealing systems
  • Leap cloud quantum service
  • Professional/consulting services

Customers

  • Enterprises and government solving optimization an

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Computing hardware
  • Quantum computing
  • Quantum annealing hardware plus cloud…

What could go right

  • Enterprise optimization use-case adoption
  • Government quantum funding

What could go wrong

  • Pre-commercial-scale revenue
  • Annealing approach not proven for all quantum workloads

Moat: narrow (IP / patents). Longest commercial track record in quantum annealing, a narrower niche than gate-model quantum computing rivals.

Headquarters: Palo Alto, California, US and Burnaby, Canada · Founded: 1999 · Employees: 388

Named competitors

QBTS at a glance

Size QBTS (QBTS) is a United States Information Technology company (Computer Processing Hardware) with a market value of $4.05B, the 1337th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $10.68 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 25.1%, against -11.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 44.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.5%); the operating margin is -1,372.9% (peer median 4.4%).

Valuation It trades at 286.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 39.5 points below its cost of capital (16.4% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $40.7M at 30 Jun 2026, up 668% on a year earlier — 3.3 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 21.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87QBTS 73
Six months, rebased to 100: QBTS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

QBTS financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$12.4M$24.6M$8.83M$8.76M$7.17M
Revenue growth—+179%+1%+22%—
Gross profit-$908,000$20.3M$5.56M$4.62M$4.25M
EBITDA-$160M-$98.1M-$75.3M-$78.7M-$57.1M
Net income-$249M-$355M-$144M-$82.7M-$53.7M
Free cash flow-$119M-$75.8M-$44.7M-$61.2M-$45.6M
Capital expenditure$8.88M$4.31M$2.40M$630,000$498,000
Total debt$48.1M$43.5M$38.4M$72.7M$42.3M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

QBTS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%2324RGTI002841NATLV0300006637062356235330077368878130054938000682INFQ688100600728300130QBTS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. QBTS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×100×200×300×2324RGTI002841NATL000066370623561688QNTQBTSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. QBTS is the large dot.

QBTS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (QBTS vs IONQ vs RGTI vs IBM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
QBTS QBTS$4.05B-25%-44%-1,373%286.2×n/a
IonQ IONQ$14.0B-34%+371%-392%48.5×n/a
RGTI RGTI$3.92B-38%+68%-728%264.8×n/a
IBM IBM$232B+6%+7%21%4.1×7.6%

How QBTS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

QBTS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureQBTSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.9%-5.8%lowest of 21
6-month return-25.1%-11.5%6th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-77.2%-35.6%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-44.2%+14.5%lowest of 19
Operating margin-1,372.9%4.4%lowest of 20
EV / Sales286.2×1.1×2nd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-39.5 pp+1.3 pp3rd lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
QBTS QBTSUnited States$4.05B-25%-44%-1,373%286.2×n/an/a
Compal Electronics 2324.TWTaiwan$4.15B+8%-4%1%0.2×n/an/a
RGTI RGTIUnited States$3.92B-38%+68%-728%264.8×n/an/a
Guangzhou Shiyuan Electronic Technology 002841.SZChina$4.37B+13%+35%8%0.8×-2.7%+7.3%
NCR Atleos NATLUnited States$3.49B+7%+2%14%1.3×-9.2%+1.8%
Venture V03.SISingapore$3.22B-21%+1%10%1.1×-1.3%-3.4%
China Greatwall Technology 000066.SZChina$5.40B-42%+28%-1%2.4×n/an/a
MiTAC 3706.TWTaiwan$2.98B-16%+44%4%0.9×n/an/a
Inventec 2356.TWTaiwan$5.71B+12%+16%2%0.3×n/an/a
Lingyi iTech (Guangdong) 1688.HKHong Kong$5.75Bn/a+14%6%0.9×n/an/a
Acer 2353.TWTaiwan$2.63B+4%+15%2%0.4×n/an/a
Lakala Payment 300773.SZChina$2.32B-25%+17%4%1.1×14.2%0.0%
SeeYA Technology 688781.SSChina$7.11B+17%n/an/an/an/an/a
Getac 3005.TWTaiwan$2.20B+19%+9%15%1.7×-7.0%+7.2%
Pegatron 4938.TWTaiwan$7.52B+14%-6%1%0.2×n/an/a
Dongfang Electronics 000682.SZChina$2.06B-21%+14%7%1.2×8.9%+17.4%
Infleqtion INFQUnited States$2.00B-27%n/a-315%67.0×n/an/a
Willfar Information Technology 688100.SSChina$1.98B-28%-9%20%4.8×17.0%+15.5%
Quantinuum QNTUnited States$9.89Bn/a+35%-644%336.4×n/an/a
PCI Technology 600728.SSChina$1.58B-7%+11%0%1.1×23.0%+18.8%
XGD 300130.SZChina$1.49B-20%+21%12%1.7×3.8%+3.8%

QBTS backlog

QBTS reported $40.7M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2026, up 668% from a year earlier and down 4% from the previous quarter. That is 3.3 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.45.

Questions

Who are QBTS's main competitors?
Named competitors: IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), IBM (IBM). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Compal Electronics (2324.TW), RGTI (RGTI), Guangzhou Shiyuan Electronic Technology (002841.SZ), NCR Atleos (NATL), Venture (V03.SI), China Greatwall Technology (000066.SZ).
Is QBTS expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 286.2× against a peer median of 1.1×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has QBTS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -25.1% against -11.5% for the median peer; over one year -68.8%.
What is QBTS's backlog?
QBTS's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $40.7M at 30 Jun 2026, +668% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.