Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › IPGP IPG Photonics CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

IPG Photonics CorporationIPGPCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Makes fiber lasers used to cut, weld and mark metal and other materials in industrial manufacturing.

≈ An industrial-laser peer of Coherent CorpMomentum laggard 15
Mkt cap
$2.78B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
32.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.3 pp
WACC 9.9%
Hurdle
+28 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
102 days
16 Feb 2027
Close · USD$65.31
1D+5.3%
1W-10.0%
1M-16.0%
3M-23.1%
6M-37.5%
YTD-8.8%
1Y-26.6%
ATR %5.9%
Beta1.99
52w lowhigh58.1% off high

What IPG Photonics does

Makes fiber lasers used to cut, weld and mark metal and other materials in industrial manufacturing.

Makes the laser source, the costly core of cutting and welding machines, in its own factories from diodes upward, and sells it mainly to machine builders who fit it into their products. China is a large market, where local rivals have cut prices hard. A Russian-born physicist, Valentin Gapontsev, founded it in 1990.

In one line: An industrial-laser peer of Coherent Corp.

Products and services

  • Fiber lasers (cutting/welding)
  • Laser systems
  • Medical/other laser applications

Customers

  • Industrial equipment makers/integrators
  • Metal fabrication/manufacturing customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Photonics
  • Fiber laser manufacturing
  • Industrial materials processing

What could go right

  • Industrial automation/EV manufacturing demand
  • Higher-power laser adoption

What could go wrong

  • Chinese fiber-laser price competition
  • Cyclical industrial capex

Moat: narrow (process know-how, IP / patents, installed base). Vertically integrated fiber-laser manufacturing and patents gave early leadership, though Chinese rivals compete hard on price.

Headquarters: Marlborough, Massachusetts, US · Founded: 1990 · Employees: 4,840

Named competitors

IPG Photonics at a glance

Size IPG Photonics (IPGP) is a United States Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $2.78B, the 1592nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $65.31 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 37.5%, against -21.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +25.1%); the operating margin is 5.1% (peer median 9.4%).

Valuation It trades at 32.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.5× (8th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is +28 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.3 points below its cost of capital (9.9% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $13.1M at 30 Sep 2025, down 40% on a year earlier — 0.0 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 9.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 75IPGP 63
Six months, rebased to 100: IPG Photonics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

IPG Photonics financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.11B$1.00B$977M$1.29B$1.43B
Revenue growth—+3%-24%-10%—
Gross profit$445M$412M$338M$538M$553M
EBITDA$124M$89.9M$75.9M$301M$320M
Net income$40.4M$31.1M-$182M$219M$110M
Free cash flow$35.0M-$3.45M$149M$186M$103M
Capital expenditure$72.3M$78.8M$98.5M$110M$110M
Total debt$16.2M$17.2M$18.0M$18.3M$38.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

IPG Photonics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%+20%548368836868844922280054340584705269AMBA65312577OUST688798PENG337460329063233007246882703277605111IPGP6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. IPG Photonics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%25×50×75×548368836868844922280054340584705269AMBA6531688798PENG337460329063233007246882703277605111IPGPRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. IPG Photonics is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%6883685434058470526965316032906323300724688270605111IPGPGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. IPG Photonics is the large dot.

IPG Photonics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (IPGP vs COHR vs 002008.SZ vs LASR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
IPG Photonics IPGP$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
Han's Laser Technology Industry 002008.SZ$7.97B-48%+59%12%19.1×19.6%
nLIGHT LASR$2.19B+72%+43%-5%61.8×39.2%
Shenzhen Jpt Opto-Electronics 688025.SS$3.97B-22%+69%18%43.3×44.7%
Novanta NOVT$5.11B-2%+8%12%33.9×33.5%

How IPG Photonics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

IPG Photonics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIPGPPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.0%-25.1%7th highest of 21
6-month return-37.5%-21.7%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-58.1%-52.9%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.8%+25.1%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin5.1%9.4%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E32.8×27.5×8th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)24.8%14.3%6th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)-3.5%+14.0%lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+28.4 pp-2.8 pp2nd most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.3 pp-0.5 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA15.0×13.9×5th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-7.3×-1.2×2nd least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
IPG Photonics IPGPUnited States$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%-3.5%
Sino-American Silicon Products 5483.TWOTaiwan$2.80B0%-1%12%15.8×n/an/a
Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor 688368.SSChina$2.72B-20%+90%6%85.4×54.1%+7.3%
Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) 688449.SSChina$2.71B-29%+40%5%37.7×n/an/a
Simmtech 222800.KSSouth Korea$2.69B+7%+42%9%18.7×n/an/a
Topco Scientific 5434.TWTaiwan$2.68B+11%+21%7%14.3×3.8%+13.3%
Leeno Industrial 058470.KSSouth Korea$2.60B-61%+24%49%19.4×6.3%+13.1%
Asmedia Technology 5269.TWTaiwan$2.60B-14%+38%25%12.5×12.3%+14.0%
Ambarella AMBAUnited States$2.58B-23%+20%-15%66.0×n/an/a
AP Memory Technology 6531.TWTaiwan$2.99B-35%+63%29%27.0×34.1%+9.8%
InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology 2577.HKHong Kong$3.03B-63%+56%-49%n/an/an/a
OUST OUSTUnited States$2.54B+38%+64%-29%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Awinic Technology 688798.SSChina$3.04B-9%+2%1%39.5×n/an/a
PENG PENGUnited States$2.52B-5%+26%10%9.2×n/an/a
Xintec 3374.TWOTaiwan$3.08B+88%+17%23%36.2×n/an/a
StarPower Semiconductor 603290.SSChina$2.50B-33%+4%1%76.8×26.3%+33.0%
Rorze 6323.TJapan$3.11B-24%+10%27%12.6×14.3%+20.4%
Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology 300724.SZChina$3.12B-36%-67%8%24.2×7.6%+30.8%
Great Microwave Technology 688270.SSChina$2.46B-41%+8%32%69.6×48.7%+23.2%
Gpixel Changchun Microelectronics 3277.HKHong Kong$2.45B-48%+27%33%28.0×6.9%+9.7%
Wuxi NCE Power 605111.SSChina$2.45B-3%+28%19%30.4×27.2%+14.5%

IPG Photonics backlog

IPG Photonics reported $13.1M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2025, down 40% from a year earlier and down 10% from the previous quarter. That is 0.0 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.99.

Questions

Who are IPG Photonics's main competitors?
Named competitors: Coherent Corp (COHR), Han's Laser (002008.SZ), Raycus Fiber Laser (private or unlisted), nLight (LASR), Shenzhen JPT Opto-Electronics (688025.SS), Novanta (NOVT). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sino-American Silicon Products (5483.TWO), Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor (688368.SS), Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) (688449.SS), Simmtech (222800.KS), Topco Scientific (5434.TW), Leeno Industrial (058470.KS).
Is IPG Photonics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 32.8× against a peer median of 27.5×, 8th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is +28 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has IPG Photonics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -37.5% against -21.7% for the median peer; over one year -26.6%.
What is IPG Photonics's backlog?
IPG Photonics's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $13.1M at 30 Sep 2025, -40% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.