Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688798.SS Shanghai Awinic Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Awinic Technology Co., Ltd. Class A688798.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Fabless designer of analog chips (power management, LED/haptic drivers, audio amps) for smartphones and consumer electronics.

≈ A small, China-focused Texas Instruments/Monolithic Power for consumer analog chipsMomentum leader 92
Mkt cap
$3.04B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
62%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$30.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
39.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.8 pp
WACC 10.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
154 days
9 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥61.25
1D+0.7%
1W+20.8%
1M+19.4%
3M+13.6%
6M-9.4%
YTD-19.5%
1Y-22.9%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh28.7% off high

What Shanghai Awinic Technology does

Fabless designer of analog chips (power management, LED/haptic drivers, audio amps) for smartphones and consumer electronics.

Designs chips and relies on outside foundries, selling to Chinese phone and consumer-electronics makers, so revenue follows these brands' phone launches and the chips they add per phone. Each new phone model is a new set of design wins.

In one line: A small, China-focused Texas Instruments/Monolithic Power for consumer analog chips.

Products and services

  • Power management ICs
  • LED driver ICs
  • Haptic driver ICs
  • Audio amplifier ICs

Customers

  • Smartphone / consumer electronics OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Fabless IC design
  • Analog / power management ICs

What could go right

  • Smartphone/consumer electronics content growth
  • China domestic analog IC substitution

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration in smartphone OEMs
  • Intense analog IC price competition

Moat: narrow (process know-how, IP / patents). Established analog IC design house serving major Chinese smartphone brands, but a crowded, price-sensitive market.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 2008 · Employees: 968

Named competitors

Shanghai Awinic Technology at a glance

Size Shanghai Awinic Technology (688798.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $3.04B, the 847th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥61.25 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.4%, against -20.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +28.8%); the operating margin is 0.8% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 39.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.6× (4th most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.8 points below its cost of capital (10.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026688798.SS 89Peer median 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Awinic Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Awinic Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.79BCN¥2.85BCN¥2.93BCN¥2.53BCN¥2.09B
Revenue growth—-3%+16%+21%—
Gross profitCN¥923MCN¥946MCN¥826MCN¥563MCN¥749M
EBITDAn/aCN¥328MCN¥271M-CN¥4.25M-CN¥52.6M
Net incomeCN¥149MCN¥317MCN¥255MCN¥51.0M-CN¥53.4M
Free cash flow-CN¥146MCN¥284M-CN¥40.5MCN¥324M-CN¥743M
Capital expenditureCN¥317MCN¥175MCN¥529MCN¥236MCN¥409M
Total debtCN¥2.37BCN¥353MCN¥586MCN¥690MCN¥697M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Awinic Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%2577337465316323300724652661476884095483300623IPGP688368688449222800688048002459058470688798.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Awinic Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×200×400×600×33746531632330072468840954833006236883686884496880485269688798.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Awinic Technology is the large dot.

Shanghai Awinic Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688798.SS vs TXN vs MPWR vs 6415.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Shanghai Awinic Technology 688798.SS$3.04B-9%+2%1%39.5×n/a
Texas Instruments TXN$253B-4%+20%41%24.6×23.3%
Monolithic Power Systems MPWR$58.1B-26%+40%30%28.3×39.6%
Silergy 6415.TW$4.58B-11%+13%12%30.5×n/a
SG Micro 300661.SZ$8.33B-12%+46%17%55.7×35.9%

How Shanghai Awinic Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Awinic Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688798.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+19.4%-25.6%highest of 21
6-month return-9.4%-20.2%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-28.7%-54.6%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.9%+28.8%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin0.8%8.6%3rd lowest of 20
Forward P/E39.5×24.6×4th most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.8 pp-2.1 pp6th lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Awinic Technology 688798.SSChina$3.04B-9%+2%1%39.5×n/an/a
InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology 2577.HKHong Kong$3.03B-63%+56%-49%n/an/an/a
Xintec 3374.TWOTaiwan$3.08B+88%+17%23%36.2×n/an/a
AP Memory Technology 6531.TWTaiwan$2.99B-35%+63%29%27.0×34.1%+9.8%
Rorze 6323.TJapan$3.11B-24%+10%27%12.6×14.3%+20.4%
Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology 300724.SZChina$3.12B-36%-67%8%24.2×7.6%+30.8%
Airoha Technology 6526.TWTaiwan$3.16B+5%+10%6%25.4×23.8%+16.5%
Chipbond Technology 6147.TWOTaiwan$3.20B-20%+18%17%17.2×n/an/a
Shenyang Fortune Precision Equipment 688409.SSChina$3.28B-2%+34%4%122.8×n/an/a
Sino-American Silicon Products 5483.TWOTaiwan$2.80B0%-1%12%15.8×n/an/a
Jiangsu JieJie Microelectronics 300623.SZChina$3.31B-9%+34%17%24.6×17.9%+28.2%
IPG Photonics IPGPUnited States$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%-3.5%
Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor 688368.SSChina$2.72B-20%+90%6%85.4×54.1%+7.3%
Jiangsu X-chip Semiconductor Tech 301707.SZChina$3.40Bn/a+55%41%n/an/an/a
Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) 688449.SSChina$2.71B-29%+40%5%37.7×n/an/a
Simmtech 222800.KSSouth Korea$2.69B+7%+42%9%18.7×n/an/a
Topco Scientific 5434.TWTaiwan$2.68B+11%+21%7%14.3×3.8%+13.3%
Suzhou Everbright Photonics 688048.SSChina$3.48B-63%+88%-1%626.2×n/an/a
JA Solar Technology 002459.SZChina$3.50B-35%-23%n/an/a-20.3%+13.7%
Leeno Industrial 058470.KSSouth Korea$2.60B-61%+24%49%19.4×6.3%+13.1%
Asmedia Technology 5269.TWTaiwan$2.60B-14%+38%25%12.5×12.3%+14.0%

Questions

Who are Shanghai Awinic Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Texas Instruments (TXN), Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), Silergy Corp (6415.TW), SG Micro (300661.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology (2577.HK), Xintec (3374.TWO), AP Memory Technology (6531.TW), Rorze (6323.T), Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology (300724.SZ), Airoha Technology (6526.TW).
Is Shanghai Awinic Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 39.5× against a peer median of 24.6×, 4th most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Awinic Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.4% against -20.2% for the median peer; over one year -22.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.