Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6147.TWO Chipbond Technology CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Chipbond Technology Corporation6147.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Taiwanese OSAT specializing in gold-bumping and chip-on-film packaging for display driver ICs.

≈ A niche display-driver AmkorMomentum weak 37
Mkt cap
$3.20B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
91%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$186M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.2 pp
WACC 12.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
105 days
19 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$142.00
1D-9.8%
1W-27.6%
1M-34.3%
3M-1.7%
6M-20.0%
YTD+163.4%
1Y+141.9%
ATR %10.3%
52w lowhigh54.7% off high

What Chipbond Technology does

Taiwanese OSAT specializing in gold-bumping and chip-on-film packaging for display driver ICs.

Customers send finished wafers and pay a processing fee for the bumping, packaging and testing, so it carries no chip-design or inventory risk of its own. Display driver chips for phones, TVs and monitors fill most of its capacity, so orders follow panel makers' production schedules.

In one line: A niche display-driver Amkor.

Products and services

  • Gold bumping
  • Chip-on-film (COF) packaging
  • IC testing
  • Panel-level packaging

Customers

  • Display driver IC design houses (e.g., Novatek, Hi
  • Panel makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Semiconductor packaging & test
  • Display driver IC packaging

What could go right

  • OLED/high-resolution display adoption
  • Automotive display demand

What could go wrong

  • Display panel industry cyclicality
  • Customer concentration in driver-IC makers

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification, process know-how). Leading bumping/COF capacity and qualified processes for major driver-IC customers.

Headquarters: Hsinchu, Taiwan · Founded: 1988

Named competitors

Chipbond Technology at a glance

Size Chipbond Technology (6147.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $3.20B, the 116th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$142.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.0%, against -25.1% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 18.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.7%); the operating margin is 16.7% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 17.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 36.2× (4th cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.2 points below its cost of capital (12.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266147.TWO 81Peer median 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Chipbond Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Chipbond Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$25.4BNT$21.5BNT$20.3BNT$20.1BNT$24.0B
Revenue growth—+5%+1%-16%—
Gross profitNT$8.92BNT$4.59BNT$4.57BNT$5.13BNT$7.83B
EBITDAn/aNT$5.40BNT$5.93BNT$7.20BNT$9.60B
Net incomeNT$4.05BNT$2.78BNT$4.13BNT$3.99BNT$6.21B
Free cash flown/a-NT$834MNT$5.25BNT$5.01BNT$7.34B
Capital expendituren/aNT$5.11BNT$935MNT$2.23BNT$3.72B
Total debtn/aNT$1.61BNT$388MNT$1.31BNT$3.44B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Chipbond Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%65263007246884096323300623337468879825776531688048002459605358DIOD2676688052301205NOD5483IPGP6147.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Chipbond Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×200×400×600×6526300724688409632330062368879865316880486053582676688052301205NOD6147.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Chipbond Technology is the large dot.

Chipbond Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6147.TWO vs 3034.TW vs HIMX vs 8150.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Chipbond Technology 6147.TWO$3.20B-20%+18%17%17.2×n/a
Novatek Microelectronics 3034.TW$9.16B+18%+2%20%14.1×-4.2%
Himax Technologies HIMX$1.45B-51%-8%5%19.1×30.3%
ChipMOS Technologies 8150.TW$1.49B-17%+19%8%12.2×n/a
Powertech Technology 6239.TW$4.61B-11%+24%13%13.2×n/a

How Chipbond Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Chipbond Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6147.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-34.3%-22.9%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-20.0%-25.1%9th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-54.7%-53.9%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+18.5%+20.7%11th highest of 21
Operating margin16.7%5.1%6th highest of 20
Forward P/E17.2×36.2×4th cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.2 pp-5.2 pp9th lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Chipbond Technology 6147.TWOTaiwan$3.20B-20%+18%17%17.2×n/an/a
Airoha Technology 6526.TWTaiwan$3.16B+5%+10%6%25.4×23.8%+16.5%
Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology 300724.SZChina$3.12B-36%-67%8%24.2×7.6%+30.8%
Shenyang Fortune Precision Equipment 688409.SSChina$3.28B-2%+34%4%122.8×n/an/a
Rorze 6323.TJapan$3.11B-24%+10%27%12.6×14.3%+20.4%
Jiangsu JieJie Microelectronics 300623.SZChina$3.31B-9%+34%17%24.6×17.9%+28.2%
Xintec 3374.TWOTaiwan$3.08B+88%+17%23%36.2×n/an/a
Shanghai Awinic Technology 688798.SSChina$3.04B-9%+2%1%39.5×n/an/a
InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology 2577.HKHong Kong$3.03B-63%+56%-49%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu X-chip Semiconductor Tech 301707.SZChina$3.40Bn/a+55%41%n/an/an/a
AP Memory Technology 6531.TWTaiwan$2.99B-35%+63%29%27.0×34.1%+9.8%
Suzhou Everbright Photonics 688048.SSChina$3.48B-63%+88%-1%626.2×n/an/a
JA Solar Technology 002459.SZChina$3.50B-35%-23%n/an/a-20.3%+13.7%
Hangzhou Lion Electronics 605358.SSChina$3.55B-25%+24%-1%81.0×n/an/a
Diodes DIODUnited States$3.56B-31%+18%5%14.6×34.0%+3.8%
Suzhou Novosense Microlectronics 2676.HKHong Kong$3.57B-28%+86%-2%121.4×n/an/a
Suzhou Novosense Microelectronics 688052.SSChina$3.60B-15%+77%-2%209.7×n/an/a
Linktel Technologies 301205.SZChina$3.60B-39%+54%3%281.1×n/an/a
Nordic Semiconductor NOD.OLNorway$3.62B-12%+15%8%54.6×n/an/a
Sino-American Silicon Products 5483.TWOTaiwan$2.80B0%-1%12%15.8×n/an/a
IPG Photonics IPGPUnited States$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%-3.5%

Questions

Who are Chipbond Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Novatek Microelectronics (3034.TW), Himax Technologies (HIMX), Chipmos Technologies (8150.TW), Powertech Technology (6239.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Airoha Technology (6526.TW), Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology (300724.SZ), Shenyang Fortune Precision Equipment (688409.SS), Rorze (6323.T), Jiangsu JieJie Microelectronics (300623.SZ), Xintec (3374.TWO).
Is Chipbond Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.2× against a peer median of 36.2×, 4th cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has Chipbond Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.0% against -25.1% for the median peer; over one year +141.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.