Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688449.SS Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Class A688449.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Hangzhou-based designer of NAND flash storage controller chips used in SSDs and memory modules.

≈ A smaller Chinese Silicon Motion (SSD controller chipmaker)Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$2.71B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$48.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
37.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-12.2 pp
WACC 18.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
154 days
9 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥39.22
1D-3.8%
1W+1.2%
1M-25.4%
3M-19.9%
6M-28.8%
YTD-13.2%
1Y-27.4%
ATR %8.1%
52w lowhigh58.2% off high

What Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) does

Hangzhou-based designer of NAND flash storage controller chips used in SSDs and memory modules.

Designs controller chips, the processors that manage reading, writing and error correction on flash memory, and has outside foundries make them. Customers build SSDs and memory modules around the controller and its firmware, so a design win tends to last through a product generation. Demand ties to the market for flash storage in China.

In one line: A smaller Chinese Silicon Motion (SSD controller chipmaker).

Products and services

  • SSD controller chips
  • eMMC/UFS controller chips
  • Firmware/software

Customers

  • SSD manufacturers
  • Memory module makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Semiconductors
  • Storage controller ICs

What could go right

  • SSD/NVMe adoption growth
  • China's domestic memory-ecosystem build-out

What could go wrong

  • Customer/product concentration
  • Pricing pressure from Taiwanese incumbents

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Controller-firmware qualification with flash and module makers, in a competitive niche.

Headquarters: Hangzhou, China · Employees: 787

Named competitors

Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) at a glance

Size Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) (688449.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $2.71B, the 949th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥39.22 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.8%, against -21.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 39.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +26.9%); the operating margin is 5.4% (peer median 7.8%).

Valuation It trades at 37.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 29.2× (8th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.2 points below its cost of capital (18.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 74688449.SS 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.78BCN¥1.32BCN¥1.17BCN¥1.03BCN¥573M
Revenue growth—+13%+13%+80%—
Gross profitCN¥907MCN¥624MCN¥499MCN¥428MCN¥211M
EBITDAn/aCN¥142MCN¥83.1MCN¥70.6M-CN¥69.2M
Net incomeCN¥378MCN¥142MCN¥118MCN¥52.2M-CN¥79.2M
Free cash flow-CN¥483MCN¥101M-CN¥98.9MCN¥94.7M-CN¥31.3M
Capital expenditureCN¥495MCN¥59.6MCN¥76.4MCN¥78.8MCN¥34.0M
Total debtCN¥341MCN¥126MCN¥116MCN¥107MCN¥56.8M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%+20%6883682228005434IPGP54830584705269AMBAOUSTPENG603290688270327760511165316883522577688798000990RUN688449.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%25×50×75×6883682228005434IPGP54830584705269AMBAPENG60329068827032776051116531688352688798000990RUN688449.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) is the large dot.

Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688449.SS vs 2451.TW vs 8299.TWO vs MRVL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) 688449.SS$2.71B-29%+40%5%37.7×n/a
Transcend Information 2451.TW$3.22B-13%+286%67%3.2×n/a
Phison Electronics 8299.TWO$10.0B-29%+157%31%3.7×n/a
Marvell Technology MRVL$124B-17%+31%17%25.0×54.4%

How Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688449.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-25.4%-21.5%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-28.8%-21.7%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-58.2%-54.0%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+39.9%+26.9%7th highest of 21
Operating margin5.4%7.8%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E37.7×29.2×8th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-12.2 pp-2.8 pp4th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) 688449.SSChina$2.71B-29%+40%5%37.7×n/an/a
Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor 688368.SSChina$2.72B-20%+90%6%85.4×54.1%+7.3%
Simmtech 222800.KSSouth Korea$2.69B+7%+42%9%18.7×n/an/a
Topco Scientific 5434.TWTaiwan$2.68B+11%+21%7%14.3×3.8%+13.3%
IPG Photonics IPGPUnited States$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%-3.5%
Sino-American Silicon Products 5483.TWOTaiwan$2.80B0%-1%12%15.8×n/an/a
Leeno Industrial 058470.KSSouth Korea$2.60B-61%+24%49%19.4×6.3%+13.1%
Asmedia Technology 5269.TWTaiwan$2.60B-14%+38%25%12.5×12.3%+14.0%
Ambarella AMBAUnited States$2.58B-23%+20%-15%66.0×n/an/a
OUST OUSTUnited States$2.54B+38%+64%-29%n/an/an/a
PENG PENGUnited States$2.52B-5%+26%10%9.2×n/an/a
StarPower Semiconductor 603290.SSChina$2.50B-33%+4%1%76.8×26.3%+33.0%
Great Microwave Technology 688270.SSChina$2.46B-41%+8%32%69.6×48.7%+23.2%
Gpixel Changchun Microelectronics 3277.HKHong Kong$2.45B-48%+27%33%28.0×6.9%+9.7%
Wuxi NCE Power 605111.SSChina$2.45B-3%+28%19%30.4×27.2%+14.5%
AP Memory Technology 6531.TWTaiwan$2.99B-35%+63%29%27.0×34.1%+9.8%
Hefei Chipmore Technology 688352.SSChina$2.45B+7%-1%7%53.1×n/an/a
InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology 2577.HKHong Kong$3.03B-63%+56%-49%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Awinic Technology 688798.SSChina$3.04B-9%+2%1%39.5×n/an/a
DB HiTek 000990.KSSouth Korea$2.41B-48%+29%21%8.9×2.3%+8.3%
Sunrun RUNUnited States$2.40B-32%+63%2%38.7×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Maxio Technology (Hangzhou)'s main competitors?
Named competitors: Silicon Motion Technology (2451.TW), Phison Electronics (8299.TWO), Innogrit Technology (private or unlisted), Marvell Technology (MRVL). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor (688368.SS), Simmtech (222800.KS), Topco Scientific (5434.TW), IPG Photonics (IPGP), Sino-American Silicon Products (5483.TWO), Leeno Industrial (058470.KS).
Is Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 37.7× against a peer median of 29.2×, 8th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.8% against -21.7% for the median peer; over one year -27.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.