Loading…

Ambarella, Inc.AMBACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Designs low-power video and AI chips that power cameras in cars, security systems and robots.

≈ A tiny, camera-focused edge-AI chip makerMomentum weak 20
Mkt cap
$2.58B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$96.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
66.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-30.0 pp
WACC 16.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
25 days
1 Dec 2026
Close · USD$58.55
1D+6.1%
1W-7.2%
1M-6.9%
3M-28.6%
6M-23.3%
YTD-17.4%
1Y-32.3%
ATR %6.8%
Beta2.55
52w lowhigh39.5% off high

What Ambarella does

Designs low-power video and AI chips that power cameras in cars, security systems and robots.

Wins a place in a product years before it ships, such as a car's driver-assistance system, then earns chip revenue as that product ramps, so today's sales reflect design wins from the past. Security cameras, still the larger market, are steadier but earn less per chip. It is fabless.

In one line: A tiny, camera-focused edge-AI chip maker.

Products and services

  • Automotive vision/AI SoCs (ADAS)
  • Security/IoT camera SoCs
  • Robotics edge-AI chips

Customers

  • Automotive OEMs/Tier-1s (ADAS)
  • Security camera makers
  • Robotics/drone makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Edge AI/vision chip design (fabless)
  • Camera/vision system-on-chips

What could go right

  • ADAS/autonomous-driving content growth
  • Security camera AI upgrade cycle

What could go wrong

  • Design-win concentration risk
  • Competition from larger chip vendors entering edge-AI

Moat: narrow (process know-how, IP / patents, customer qualification). Deep computer-vision/video-compression IP and automotive design-in cycles, in a competitive edge-AI chip market.

Headquarters: Santa Clara, California, US · Founded: 2004 · Employees: 959

Named competitors

Ambarella at a glance

Size Ambarella (AMBA) is a United States Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $2.58B, the 1631st largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $58.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.3%, against -17.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +26.9%); the operating margin is -14.6% (peer median 7.8%).

Valuation It trades at 66.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.0× (4th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 30.0 points below its cost of capital (16.6% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $91.4M at 31 Jul 2026, up 133% on a year earlier — 0.2 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 10.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 81AMBA 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Ambarella against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ambarella financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-01-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$418M$391M$285M$226M$338M
Revenue growth—+37%+26%-33%—
Gross profit$240M$226M$168M$132M$205M
EBITDA-$36.0M-$56.9M-$101M-$126M-$51.2M
Net income-$56.3M-$75.9M-$117M-$169M-$65.4M
Free cash flow$9.72M$58.0M$23.5M$7.05M$29.0M
Capital expenditure$17.6M$15.5M$10.4M$12.0M$15.1M
Total debt$12.6M$13.4M$5.26M$5.34M$8.64M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ambarella competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%5269058470OUSTPENG60329054342228006884496882703277605111688352000990IPGPRUN553630265483002745AMBA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ambarella is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%25×50×75×5269058470PENG60329054342228006884496882703277688368605111688352000990IPGPRUN5483AMBARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ambarella is the large dot.

Ambarella competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AMBA vs QCOM vs NXPI vs 3034.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ambarella AMBA$2.58B-23%+20%-15%66.0×n/a
Qualcomm QCOM$177B-24%+2%24%17.0×15.9%
NXP Semiconductors NXPI$62.6B-15%+15%30%14.1×16.3%
Novatek Microelectronics 3034.TW$9.16B+18%+2%20%14.1×-4.2%

How Ambarella compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ambarella against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAMBAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.9%-23.5%4th highest of 21
6-month return-23.3%-17.1%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-39.5%-55.4%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.0%+26.9%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin-14.6%7.8%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E66.0×24.0×4th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-30.0 pp-1.7 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ambarella AMBAUnited States$2.58B-23%+20%-15%66.0×n/an/a
Asmedia Technology 5269.TWTaiwan$2.60B-14%+38%25%12.5×12.3%+14.0%
Leeno Industrial 058470.KSSouth Korea$2.60B-61%+24%49%19.4×6.3%+13.1%
OUST OUSTUnited States$2.54B+38%+64%-29%n/an/an/a
PENG PENGUnited States$2.52B-5%+26%10%9.2×n/an/a
StarPower Semiconductor 603290.SSChina$2.50B-33%+4%1%76.8×26.3%+33.0%
Topco Scientific 5434.TWTaiwan$2.68B+11%+21%7%14.3×3.8%+13.3%
Simmtech 222800.KSSouth Korea$2.69B+7%+42%9%18.7×n/an/a
Maxio Technology (Hangzhou) 688449.SSChina$2.71B-29%+40%5%37.7×n/an/a
Great Microwave Technology 688270.SSChina$2.46B-41%+8%32%69.6×48.7%+23.2%
Gpixel Changchun Microelectronics 3277.HKHong Kong$2.45B-48%+27%33%28.0×6.9%+9.7%
Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor 688368.SSChina$2.72B-20%+90%6%85.4×54.1%+7.3%
Wuxi NCE Power 605111.SSChina$2.45B-3%+28%19%30.4×27.2%+14.5%
Hefei Chipmore Technology 688352.SSChina$2.45B+7%-1%7%53.1×n/an/a
DB HiTek 000990.KSSouth Korea$2.41B-48%+29%21%8.9×2.3%+8.3%
IPG Photonics IPGPUnited States$2.78B-38%+15%5%32.8×24.8%-3.5%
Sunrun RUNUnited States$2.40B-32%+63%2%38.7×n/an/a
Acter 5536.TWOTaiwan$2.39B-26%+28%16%10.0×-6.0%+24.3%
Holy Stone Enterprise 3026.TWTaiwan$2.39B+91%+17%2%21.0×n/an/a
Sino-American Silicon Products 5483.TWOTaiwan$2.80B0%-1%12%15.8×n/an/a
MLS 002745.SZChina$2.36B+11%+19%-4%24.0×2.4%+0.1%

Ambarella backlog

Ambarella reported $91.4M of remaining performance obligations at 31 Jul 2026, up 133% from a year earlier and up 31% from the previous quarter. That is 0.2 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.20.

Questions

Who are Ambarella's main competitors?
Named competitors: Qualcomm (QCOM), NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), Novatek Microelectronics (3034.TW), Hailo (private) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Asmedia Technology (5269.TW), Leeno Industrial (058470.KS), OUST (OUST), PENG (PENG), StarPower Semiconductor (603290.SS), Topco Scientific (5434.TW).
Is Ambarella expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 66.0× against a peer median of 24.0×, 4th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Ambarella stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.3% against -17.1% for the median peer; over one year -32.3%.
What is Ambarella's backlog?
Ambarella's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $91.4M at 31 Jul 2026, +133% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.