Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002745.SZ MLS Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

MLS Co., Ltd. Class A002745.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Makes LED packaging products (SMD, chip-on-board) for general lighting and display-backlight applications.

≈ A Chinese LED-packaging maker, similar niche to Nichia's packaging businessMomentum leader 89
Mkt cap
$2.36B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
70%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$68.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.4 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥10.55
1D-2.5%
1W+4.5%
1M-4.9%
3M+6.8%
6M+11.2%
YTD+10.2%
1Y+19.5%
ATR %5.0%
52w lowhigh24.5% off high

What MLS does

Makes LED packaging products (SMD, chip-on-board) for general lighting and display-backlight applications.

In one line: A Chinese LED-packaging maker, similar niche to Nichia's packaging business.

Products and services

  • SMD LED packages
  • COB LED modules
  • LED lighting components

Customers

  • Lighting fixture makers
  • Display backlight makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Optoelectronics
  • LED packaging
  • SMD/COB LED packages

What could go right

  • General lighting/backlight demand
  • Mini-LED adoption

What could go wrong

  • LED price deflation/overcapacity
  • Commoditized competition

Moat: none (scale). LED packaging is a commodity, capacity-driven business with thin, cyclical margins.

Headquarters: Zhongshan, China · Employees: 16,032

Named competitors

MLS at a glance

Size MLS (002745.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $2.36B, the 1085th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥10.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 11.2%, against -32.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.8%); the operating margin is -4.5% (peer median 11.3%).

Valuation It trades at 24.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 30.4× (7th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is 0%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.4 points below its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026002745.SZ 110Peer median 67
Six months, rebased to 100: MLS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

MLS financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥20.1BCN¥17.4BCN¥16.9BCN¥17.5BCN¥16.5B
Revenue growth—+3%-4%+6%—
Gross profitCN¥6.07BCN¥4.28BCN¥4.48BCN¥4.86BCN¥4.15B
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.26BCN¥1.77BCN¥1.97BCN¥1.63B
Net income-CN¥792M-CN¥1.48BCN¥374MCN¥430MCN¥194M
Free cash flowCN¥1.04BCN¥386MCN¥776MCN¥1.39B-CN¥322M
Capital expenditureCN¥893MCN¥525MCN¥1.08BCN¥562MCN¥519M
Total debtCN¥5.43BCN¥3.93BCN¥3.57BCN¥3.25BCN¥5.76B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MLS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%30061330265536NVTSRUN000990651078566883526051116881233277300102688270002506POWI3714603290688807PENG002745.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MLS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×50×100×150×30061330265536RUN00099065107856688352688123300102688270POWI603290688807002745.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MLS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%5536000990651078566051116881233277300102688270002506POWI603290002745.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MLS is the large dot.

MLS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002745.SZ vs 600703.SS vs 002609.SZ vs 002449.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MLS 002745.SZ$2.36B+11%+19%-4%24.0×2.4%
Sanan Optoelectronics 600703.SS$6.87B-33%-22%-7%n/an/a
Shenzhen Jieshun Science & Technology Industry 002609.SZ$683M-14%+5%3%26.4×1.9%
Foshan Nationstar Optoelectronics 002449.SZ$557M-24%-17%-6%n/an/a
Shenzhen Refond Optoelectronics 300241.SZ$668M-22%+24%4%n/a16.7%
Everlight Electronics 2393.TW$807M-17%-3%10%13.3×-11.7%
Seoul Semiconductor 046890.KS$358M-48%0%0%77.0×28.9%

How MLS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MLS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002745.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.9%-21.4%5th highest of 21
6-month return+11.2%-32.5%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-24.5%-57.6%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.2%+20.8%11th highest of 21
Operating margin-4.5%11.3%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E24.0×30.4×7th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.4%29.5%3rd least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.1%+20.3%2nd lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.4 pp+11.8 pp6th least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.4 pp-2.3 pp6th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MLS 002745.SZChina$2.36B+11%+19%-4%24.0×2.4%+0.1%
Shanghai Fullhan Microelectronics 300613.SZChina$2.35B+14%+91%26%43.1×n/an/a
Holy Stone Enterprise 3026.TWTaiwan$2.39B+91%+17%2%21.0×n/an/a
Acter 5536.TWOTaiwan$2.39B-26%+28%16%10.0×-6.0%+24.3%
NVTS NVTSUnited States$2.32B-53%-29%-273%n/an/an/a
Sunrun RUNUnited States$2.40B-32%+63%2%38.7×n/an/a
DB HiTek 000990.KSSouth Korea$2.41B-48%+29%21%8.9×2.3%+8.3%
Chunghwa Precision Test Tech 6510.TWOTaiwan$2.30B-37%+24%32%28.3×24.4%+2.7%
Hermes Testing Solutions 7856.TWOTaiwan$2.29B-32%+52%12%46.2×52.1%+51.8%
Hefei Chipmore Technology 688352.SSChina$2.45B+7%-1%7%53.1×n/an/a
Wuxi NCE Power 605111.SSChina$2.45B-3%+28%19%30.4×27.2%+14.5%
Giantec Semiconductor 688123.SSChina$2.27B-23%+13%22%23.3×39.2%+19.8%
Gpixel Changchun Microelectronics 3277.HKHong Kong$2.45B-48%+27%33%28.0×6.9%+9.7%
Xiamen Changelight 300102.SZChina$2.26B-50%-38%-2%71.3×34.6%+21.1%
Great Microwave Technology 688270.SSChina$2.46B-41%+8%32%69.6×48.7%+23.2%
GCL System Integration Technology 002506.SZChina$2.26B-39%-32%-10%n/a31.8%+20.8%
POWI POWIUnited States$2.25B-45%+2%8%22.9×35.9%-1.9%
Ennostar 3714.TWTaiwan$2.23B-23%-5%-13%n/an/an/a
StarPower Semiconductor 603290.SSChina$2.50B-33%+4%1%76.8×26.3%+33.0%
Xiamen UX IC 688807.SSChina$2.22B-48%+26%13%144.5×n/an/a
PENG PENGUnited States$2.52B-5%+26%10%9.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are MLS's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sanan Optoelectronics (600703.SS), Elec-Tech International (002609.SZ), Nichia (private or unlisted), Cree LED (SGH) (private or unlisted), Foshan NationStar Optoelectronics (002449.SZ), Refond Optoelectronics (300241.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Fullhan Microelectronics (300613.SZ), Holy Stone Enterprise (3026.TW), Acter (5536.TWO), NVTS (NVTS), Sunrun (RUN), DB HiTek (000990.KS).
Is MLS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.0× against a peer median of 30.4×, 7th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is 0%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has MLS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +11.2% against -32.5% for the median peer; over one year +19.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.