Loading…

IGO LimitedIGO.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

Australian miner producing lithium (via Greenbushes/Kwinana joint ventures) and nickel from Western Australian operations.

≈ An Australian lithium/nickel miner akin to a smaller AlbemarleMomentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$2.60B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-16.5 pp
WACC 11.2%
Hurdle
+24 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$4.96
1D-5.9%
1W-0.4%
1M-20.0%
3M-36.4%
6M-45.0%
YTD-39.5%
1Y-7.1%
ATR %5.7%
52w lowhigh50.6% off high

What IGO does

Australian miner producing lithium (via Greenbushes/Kwinana joint ventures) and nickel from Western Australian operations.

Holds its lithium interests through joint ventures, notably with Tianqi, rather than operating them alone, so its lithium earnings are a share of the venture's profit and follow the lithium price; nickel, from the mine it runs itself, is its second commodity.

In one line: An Australian lithium/nickel miner akin to a smaller Albemarle.

Products and services

  • Greenbushes lithium JV stake
  • Kwinana lithium hydroxide JV stake
  • Nova nickel operation

Customers

  • Battery/EV supply chain (via JV partners)
  • Nickel smelters/traders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Battery materials mining
  • Lithium mining/processing
  • Nickel mining

What could go right

  • Lithium price recovery
  • EV battery demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Lithium/nickel price cyclicality
  • JV partner/offtake concentration

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Stake in Greenbushes, the world's largest hard-rock lithium mine, is a scarce, high-grade asset.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 1972

Named competitors

IGO at a glance

Size IGO (IGO.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $2.60B, the 106th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$4.96 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 45.0%, against -22.2% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 11.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +31.6%); the operating margin is -30.6% (peer median 14.3%).

Valuation It trades at 8.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.8× (4th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -7%, so the hurdle is +24 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 16.5 points below its cost of capital (11.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 78IGO.AX 57
Six months, rebased to 100: IGO against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

IGO financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$442MA$442MA$500MA$796MA$1.05B
Revenue growth—-12%-37%-24%—
Gross profit-A$74.9M-A$79.7M-A$176M-A$135MA$203M
EBITDAA$51.4MA$51.7M-A$25.2MA$42.2MA$430M
Net incomeA$145MA$145M-A$955MA$2.80MA$549M
Free cash flowA$131MA$131MA$32.7MA$694MA$1.05B
Capital expenditureA$6.10MA$6.10MA$5.30MA$199MA$338M
Total debtn/aA$16.8MA$31.4MA$48.7MA$432M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

IGO competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%TKO6036636031320006030021495714002240600961601609ALMPDN0007376011378358ERO000962ALSVNPIGO.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. IGO is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×50×100×150×TKO6036630006030021495714002240600961ALMPDNERO000962ALS600259VNPIGO.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. IGO is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%603407603663000603002149600961000737EROALSIGO.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. IGO is the large dot.

IGO competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (IGO.AX vs PLS.AX vs MIN.AX vs LTR.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
IGO IGO.AX$2.60B-45%-12%-31%8.9×17.2%
PLS PLS.AX$6.33B-56%+152%43%10.6×2.5%
Mineral Resources MIN.AX$6.36B-34%+44%25%13.8×4.2%
Liontown LTR.AX$1.43B-75%+115%8%18.9×38.7%
Albemarle ALB$11.7B-51%+18%14%11.3×10.9%

How IGO compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

IGO against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIGO.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.0%-18.8%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-45.0%-22.2%3rd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-50.6%-51.2%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-11.6%+31.6%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin-30.6%14.3%lowest of 21
Forward P/E8.9×19.8×4th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.2%30.5%5th least demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)-6.5%+9.1%lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+23.8 pp+21.4 pp5th least demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-16.5 pp-1.2 pplowest of 21
EV / EBITDA63.8×16.2×most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-9.1×0.1×2nd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
IGO IGO.AXAustralia$2.60B-45%-12%-31%8.9×17.2%-6.5%
Changyu 603407.SSChina$2.59Bn/a+9%16%n/a51.8%+2.2%
Trekor Metals TKO.TOCanada$2.57B-1%+68%28%9.8×n/an/a
Sanxiang Advanced Materials 603663.SSChina$2.65B-10%+5%18%44.4×48.1%+9.7%
Jinhui Mining 603132.SSChina$2.53B-11%+38%51%n/an/an/a
Shengda Resources 000603.SZChina$2.75B-27%+25%47%15.8×12.8%+8.5%
Western Metal Materials 002149.SZChina$2.76B-41%+3%0%139.8×54.3%+9.7%
Dowa 5714.TJapan$2.78B-22%+29%6%6.9×n/an/a
Chengxin Lithium 002240.SZChina$2.79B-66%+226%20%11.3×n/an/a
Zhuzhou Smelter 600961.SSChina$2.85B-33%+23%12%6.7×-1.6%+8.5%
Ningbo Jintian Copper (Group) 601609.SSChina$2.36B-11%+25%1%15.3×n/an/a
Almonty Industries ALMUnited States$2.34B-59%+208%5%12.3×n/an/a
Paladin Energy PDN.AXAustralia$2.32B-33%+64%4%50.9×n/an/a
North Copper 000737.SZChina$2.97B-28%+54%9%n/a-3.9%+26.8%
Ningbo Boway Alloy Material 601137.SSChina$2.26B-6%+31%0%19.8×n/an/a
Co-tech Development 8358.TWOTaiwan$2.24B-30%+31%23%19.9×n/an/a
Ero Copper ERO.TOCanada$3.03B+10%+106%40%5.9×0.4%+20.4%
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry 000962.SZChina$3.08B-11%+43%12%54.0×n/an/a
Altius Minerals ALS.TOCanada$2.16B-2%+68%17%47.6×57.7%-4.5%
China Rare Earth Nonferrous Metals 600259.SSChina$3.13B-33%-43%4%34.1×n/an/a
5N Plus VNP.TOCanada$2.15B-10%+32%18%28.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are IGO's main competitors?
Named competitors: Pilbara Minerals (PLS.AX), Mineral Resources (MIN.AX), Liontown Resources (LTR.AX), Albemarle (ALB). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Changyu (603407.SS), Trekor Metals (TKO.TO), Sanxiang Advanced Materials (603663.SS), Jinhui Mining (603132.SS), Shengda Resources (000603.SZ), Western Metal Materials (002149.SZ).
Is IGO expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.9× against a peer median of 19.8×, 4th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -7%, so the hurdle is +24 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has IGO stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -45.0% against -22.2% for the median peer; over one year -7.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.