Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PLS.AX PLS Group LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

PLS Group LimitedPLS.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

One of the world's largest hard-rock lithium miners, producing spodumene concentrate from its Pilgangoora mine in Western Australia.

≈ Australia's Albemarle (mining-only)Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$6.33B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$80.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.3 pp
WACC 11.0%
Hurdle
-59 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB- / B+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$2.83
1D0.0%
1W+7.2%
1M-23.5%
3M-39.5%
6M-56.1%
YTD-32.9%
1Y-11.6%
ATR %6.6%
52w lowhigh58.4% off high

What PLS does

One of the world's largest hard-rock lithium miners, producing spodumene concentrate from its Pilgangoora mine in Western Australia.

Sells spodumene, the lithium-bearing ore concentrate, to converters under supply agreements, with prices tied to the lithium market, so price swings reach profit directly. It has a joint venture with POSCO to convert concentrate to lithium hydroxide in Korea.

In one line: Australia's Albemarle (mining-only).

Products and services

  • Spodumene concentrate (Pilgangoora)
  • Lithium chemicals JV downstream

Customers

  • Battery/cathode makers in China and Korea
  • EV battery supply chains

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Lithium mining
  • Spodumene concentrate production

What could go right

  • EV battery demand growth
  • Lithium-price cycle recovery

What could go wrong

  • Lithium price volatility/oversupply
  • China demand dependency

Moat: none (scale). Large low-cost resource but lithium concentrate is a commodity with no pricing power.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 2005 · Employees: 1,175

Named competitors

PLS at a glance

Size PLS (PLS.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $6.33B, the 56th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$2.83 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 56.1%, against -19.8% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 152.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +30.5%); the operating margin is 43.0% (peer median 17.3%).

Valuation It trades at 10.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.3× (5th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +62%, so the hurdle is -59 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.3 points above its cost of capital (11.0% WACC).

Credit PLS has 1 bond outstanding ($700M), rated BB- by the agencies and trading like B+ at a weighted spread of 343 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80PLS.AX 44
Six months, rebased to 100: PLS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

PLS financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$1.94BA$1.94BA$769MA$1.25BA$4.06B
Revenue growth—+152%-39%-69%—
Gross profitA$933MA$912M-A$71.3MA$478MA$3.27B
EBITDAA$1.11BA$1.11BA$77.5MA$548MA$3.32B
Net incomeA$526MA$526M-A$196MA$257MA$2.39B
Free cash flowA$991MA$991M-A$524M-A$1.29BA$3.04B
Capital expenditureA$344MA$344MA$654MA$810MA$386M
Total debtn/aA$1.23BA$682MA$556MA$472M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

PLS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%MP000426DSVSFRAUGONMDCCSNDA6885196004971258688303000960002428NXE6012123939000831000893000878PLS.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. PLS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%+600%0×100×200×MP000426DSVSFR688519002428000831PLS.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. PLS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%75%000426SFRAUGONMDCCS60049712580009603939000831000893PLS.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. PLS is the large dot.

PLS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PLS.AX vs ALB vs MIN.AX vs IGO.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
PLS PLS.AX$6.33B-56%+152%43%10.6×2.5%
Albemarle ALB$11.7B-51%+18%14%11.3×10.9%
Mineral Resources MIN.AX$6.36B-34%+44%25%13.8×4.2%
IGO IGO.AX$2.60B-45%-12%-31%8.9×17.2%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A. Sponsored ADR Pfd Series B SQM$16.0B-37%+59%39%7.3×-4.8%

How PLS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

PLS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePLS.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.5%-12.4%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-56.1%-19.8%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-58.4%-41.5%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+152.0%+30.5%2nd highest of 20
Operating margin43.0%17.3%4th highest of 20
Forward P/E10.6×13.3×5th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.5%4.8%6th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+61.6%+17.0%2nd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-59.1 pp-16.6 pp2nd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.3 pp+5.0 pp7th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.3×6.7×4th most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×-0.5×3rd least indebted of 10
Bond spread343 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
PLS PLS.AXAustralia$6.33B-56%+152%43%10.6×2.5%+61.6%
MP Materials MPUnited States$6.31B-47%+72%-17%248.7×n/an/a
Inner Mongolia Xingye Silver and Tin Mining 000426.SZChina$6.23B-42%+38%49%13.1×7.8%+42.6%
Discovery Mining DSV.TOCanada$6.44B+19%+684%38%17.6×19.9%n/a
Sandfire Resources SFR.AXAustralia$6.20B-4%+32%32%13.3×9.2%+25.8%
Aura Minerals AUGOUnited States$6.52B-5%+89%53%10.6×-6.0%+25.2%
NMDC NMDC.NSIndia$6.55B-22%+27%27%7.4×5.2%+15.8%
Capstone Copper CS.TOCanada$6.01B-8%+30%32%9.4×9.8%+40.2%
Aurubis NDA.DEGermany$6.73B-35%+23%6%15.1×n/an/a
Nanya New Material Technology 688519.SSChina$5.90B-5%+104%17%55.2×n/an/a
Yunnan Chihong Zinc & Germanium 600497.SSChina$5.76B-15%+29%10%13.8×4.4%+4.6%
China Nonferrous Mining 1258.HKHong Kong$5.73B-19%+11%28%7.4×-14.6%+5.8%
Xinjiang Daqo New Energy 688303.SSChina$5.69B-20%-23%-62%n/an/an/a
Yunnan Tin 000960.SZChina$5.66B-34%+19%8%10.8×1.9%-0.5%
Yunnan Lincang Xinyuan Germanium Industry 002428.SZChina$7.09B+3%+54%13%230.8×n/an/a
NexGen Energy NXE.TOCanada$5.57B-31%n/an/an/an/an/a
Baiyin Nonferrous 601212.SSChina$5.49B-35%0%5%n/an/an/a
Wanguo Gold 3939.HKHong Kong$7.31B+6%+79%67%20.2×1.7%+17.0%
China Rare Earth Resources And Technology 000831.SZChina$7.57B-7%-2%15%103.1×53.1%+14.0%
Asia-Potash International Investment (Guangzhou) 000893.SZChina$5.08B-32%+40%36%11.6×-3.3%+72.1%
Yunnan Copper 000878.SZChina$5.01B-28%+10%2%11.9×n/an/a

PLS bonds and credit

PLS has 1 bond outstanding with $700M face value. The agencies rate it BB-; its bonds trade like B+. Weighted yield 8.12%, a spread of 343 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are PLS's main competitors?
Named competitors: Albemarle (ALB), Mineral Resources (MIN.AX), IGO Limited (IGO.AX), SQM (SQM). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes MP Materials (MP), Inner Mongolia Xingye Silver and Tin Mining (000426.SZ), Discovery Mining (DSV.TO), Sandfire Resources (SFR.AX), Aura Minerals (AUGO), NMDC (NMDC.NS).
Is PLS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.6× against a peer median of 13.3×, 5th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +62%, so the hurdle is -59 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has PLS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -56.1% against -19.8% for the median peer; over one year -11.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.