Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TKO.TO Trekor Metals LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Trekor Metals LimitedTKO.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

North American copper producer operating the Gibraltar mine in British Columbia and developing the Florence Copper in-situ recovery project in Arizona (formerly Taseko Mines).

≈ A mid-cap North American copper minerMomentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$2.57B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.57M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.1 pp
WACC 11.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · CADC$9.85
1D+0.6%
1W-4.4%
1M-18.9%
3M-15.4%
6M-0.5%
YTD+26.8%
1Y+60.7%
ATR %6.3%
52w lowhigh27.6% off high

What Trekor Metals does

North American copper producer operating the Gibraltar mine in British Columbia and developing the Florence Copper in-situ recovery project in Arizona (formerly Taseko Mines).

Gibraltar sells copper concentrate, with molybdenum as a by-product, to smelters mostly in Asia at prices linked to the copper benchmark less smelter charges; the company owns three-quarters of it, with Japanese partners holding the rest. Florence recovers copper in liquid form from underground and makes finished cathode that needs no smelter.

In one line: A mid-cap North American copper miner.

Products and services

  • Gibraltar copper-molybdenum mine
  • Florence Copper in-situ recovery project
  • Yellowhead/Aley exploration projects

Customers

  • Global copper smelters/traders (via concentrate sa
  • US copper cathode buyers (Florence)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Base metals mining
  • Open-pit copper mining (Gibraltar)
  • In-situ recovery copper production…

What could go right

  • Copper price strength (electrification/AI power demand)
  • Florence Copper low-cost production growth

What could go wrong

  • Copper price volatility
  • Florence in-situ recovery technology/regulatory execution risk

Moat: narrow (installed base, IP / patents). Long-life Gibraltar mine and proprietary low-cost in-situ recovery technology at Florence differentiate it from conventional open-pit peers.

Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada · Founded: 1966 · Employees: 963

Named competitors

Trekor Metals at a glance

Size Trekor Metals (TKO.TO) is a Canada Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $2.57B, the 169th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$9.85 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.5%, against -27.3% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 68.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +31.0%); the operating margin is 28.3% (peer median 12.3%).

Valuation It trades at 9.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.8× (5th cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.1 points above its cost of capital (11.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026TKO.TO 96Peer median 70
Six months, rebased to 100: Trekor Metals against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Trekor Metals financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$975MC$673MC$605MC$525MC$393M
Revenue growth—+11%+15%+34%—
Gross profitC$319MC$141MC$108MC$147MC$54.6M
EBITDAC$403MC$210MC$163MC$186MC$91.1M
Net incomeC$15.7M-C$30.1M-C$13.4MC$82.7M-C$26.0M
Free cash flow-C$7.69M-C$282M-C$156M-C$69.7M-C$140M
Capital expenditureC$354MC$428MC$318MC$173MC$182M
Total debtC$1.01BC$861MC$797MC$638MC$587M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Trekor Metals competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%IGO6031326036630006030021495714002240601609ALMPDN6009616011378358000737EROALSVNP000962LEUTKO.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Trekor Metals is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×50×100×150×IGO6036630006030021495714002240ALMPDN600961EROALSVNP000962LEUTKO.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Trekor Metals is the large dot.

Trekor Metals competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TKO.TO vs LUN.TO vs HBM.TO vs ERO.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Trekor Metals TKO.TO$2.57B-1%+68%28%9.8×n/a
Lundin Mining LUN.TO$18.1B-18%+29%36%14.1×15.2%
Hudbay Minerals HBM.TO$9.35B-10%+13%32%12.0×18.1%
Ero Copper ERO.TO$3.03B+10%+106%40%5.9×0.4%

How Trekor Metals compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Trekor Metals against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTKO.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-18.9%-20.1%10th highest of 21
6-month return-0.5%-27.3%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-27.6%-51.9%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+68.3%+31.0%4th highest of 21
Operating margin28.3%12.3%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E9.8×19.8×5th cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.1 pp-1.5 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.0×27.0×4th cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×-1.8×most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Trekor Metals TKO.TOCanada$2.57B-1%+68%28%9.8×n/an/a
Changyu 603407.SSChina$2.59Bn/a+9%16%n/a51.8%+2.2%
IGO IGO.AXAustralia$2.60B-45%-12%-31%8.9×17.2%-6.5%
Jinhui Mining 603132.SSChina$2.53B-11%+38%51%n/an/an/a
Sanxiang Advanced Materials 603663.SSChina$2.65B-10%+5%18%44.4×48.1%+9.7%
Shengda Resources 000603.SZChina$2.75B-27%+25%47%15.8×12.8%+8.5%
Western Metal Materials 002149.SZChina$2.76B-41%+3%0%139.8×54.3%+9.7%
Dowa 5714.TJapan$2.78B-22%+29%6%6.9×n/an/a
Chengxin Lithium 002240.SZChina$2.79B-66%+226%20%11.3×n/an/a
Ningbo Jintian Copper (Group) 601609.SSChina$2.36B-11%+25%1%15.3×n/an/a
Almonty Industries ALMUnited States$2.34B-59%+208%5%12.3×n/an/a
Paladin Energy PDN.AXAustralia$2.32B-33%+64%4%50.9×n/an/a
Zhuzhou Smelter 600961.SSChina$2.85B-33%+23%12%6.7×-1.6%+8.5%
Ningbo Boway Alloy Material 601137.SSChina$2.26B-6%+31%0%19.8×n/an/a
Co-tech Development 8358.TWOTaiwan$2.24B-30%+31%23%19.9×n/an/a
North Copper 000737.SZChina$2.97B-28%+54%9%n/a-3.9%+26.8%
Ero Copper ERO.TOCanada$3.03B+10%+106%40%5.9×0.4%+20.4%
Altius Minerals ALS.TOCanada$2.16B-2%+68%17%47.6×57.7%-4.5%
5N Plus VNP.TOCanada$2.15B-10%+32%18%28.8×n/an/a
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry 000962.SZChina$3.08B-11%+43%12%54.0×n/an/a
Centrus Energy LEUUnited States$2.14B-50%+8%2%34.5×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Trekor Metals's main competitors?
Named competitors: Lundin Mining (LUN.TO), Hudbay Minerals (HBM.TO), Ero Copper (ERO.TO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Changyu (603407.SS), IGO (IGO.AX), Jinhui Mining (603132.SS), Sanxiang Advanced Materials (603663.SS), Shengda Resources (000603.SZ), Western Metal Materials (002149.SZ).
Is Trekor Metals expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.8× against a peer median of 19.8×, 5th cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has Trekor Metals stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.5% against -27.3% for the median peer; over one year +60.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.