Loading…

Graham CorporationGHMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Makes vacuum and heat-transfer equipment for defense (naval nuclear propulsion), refining, chemical and space customers.

Momentum weak 22
Mkt cap
$916M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
44.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.7 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
94 days
8 Feb 2027
Close · USD$78.02
1D+8.2%
1W+11.5%
1M-4.3%
3M-28.3%
6M-20.5%
YTD+21.5%
1Y+22.0%
ATR %5.7%
Beta1.69
52w lowhigh38.0% off high

What Graham does

Makes vacuum and heat-transfer equipment for defense (naval nuclear propulsion), refining, chemical and space customers.

Builds to order under long fixed-price contracts, recognizing revenue as work progresses, with the US Navy's submarine and carrier programs as the key buyer through shipbuilders. The 2021 acquisition of Barber-Nichols added turbomachinery for space and defense and shifted the mix toward defense.

Products and services

  • Naval nuclear propulsion components
  • Vacuum/heat transfer equipment for refining
  • Space/defense components

Customers

  • US Navy/defense shipbuilders
  • Refining and chemical plants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial machinery
  • Heat transfer/vacuum equipment
  • Defense and process industry customers

What could go right

  • US Navy shipbuilding/submarine program growth
  • Defense budget increases

What could go wrong

  • Defense program timing/budget risk
  • Refining capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, customer qualification, process know-how). Qualified defense supplier status for naval nuclear programs is a high barrier for new entrants.

Headquarters: Batavia, New York, United States · Founded: 1936 · Employees: 732

Named competitors

Graham at a glance

Size Graham (GHM) is a United States Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $916M, the 2303rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $78.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.5%, against -17.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 21.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.2%); the operating margin is 6.6% (peer median 6.7%).

Valuation It trades at 44.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (3rd most expensive of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.7 points below its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $561M at 30 Sep 2026, up 12% on a year earlier — 2.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 8.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 82GHM 79
Six months, rebased to 100: Graham against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Graham financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$261M$245M$210M$186M$157M
Revenue growth—+17%+13%+18%—
Gross profit$59.0M$56.0M$55.2M$43.2M$24.3M
EBITDA$26.2M$24.1M$20.0M$12.8M$7.24M
Net income$11.8M$12.5M$12.2M$4.56M$367,000
Free cash flow-$6.12M-$121,000$5.36M$18.9M$10.2M
Capital expenditure$11.7M$16.1M$19.0M$9.23M$3.75M
Total debt$6.79M$20.2M$6.85M$7.77M$20.4M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Graham competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%6498002510688556DYNAMATECH0020736420BANCOINDIA300470TCW688155UNIMECH2432603985600579002006SMHN300091MTU603890GHM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Graham is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×6498DYNAMATECH0020736420300470TCW688155UNIMECH002006SMHNGHMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Graham is the large dot.

Graham competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GHM vs CW vs BWXT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Graham GHM$916M-21%+21%7%44.8×n/a
Curtiss-Wright CW$17.1B-36%+11%19%27.4×16.2%
BWX Technologies BWXT$11.0B-42%+18%10%23.8×19.6%

How Graham compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Graham against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGHMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.3%-4.9%10th highest of 21
6-month return-20.5%-17.7%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-38.0%-37.3%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+21.2%+7.2%6th highest of 21
Operating margin6.6%6.7%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E44.8×14.8×3rd most expensive of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.7 pp-2.6 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA34.1×9.6×3rd most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-0.8×0.5×3rd least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Graham GHMUnited States$916M-21%+21%7%44.8×n/an/a
Kitz 6498.TJapan$915M-21%+8%8%10.1×4.3%+9.5%
Tianjin Motor Dies 002510.SZChina$918M-10%+5%-1%n/a33.8%+12.2%
Qingdao Gaoce Technology 688556.SSChina$922M-45%+5%-17%n/a8.8%+37.4%
Dynamatic Technologies DYNAMATECH.NSIndia$922M+3%+17%7%88.0×n/an/a
Mesnac 002073.SZChina$923M-11%+18%4%14.7×-3.2%+21.6%
Galilei 6420.TJapan$925M-3%+4%13%10.7×n/an/a
Banco Products (India) BANCOINDIA.NSIndia$905M-7%+22%14%n/a24.8%+20.6%
Sinoseal 300470.SZChina$903M-18%+1%20%14.9×-0.7%+13.9%
Trican Well Service TCW.TOCanada$899M-10%+15%14%9.3×-11.5%+22.5%
Shanghai SK Automation Technology 688155.SSChina$936M-53%+56%15%17.6×5.3%+43.3%
Unimech Aerospace & Manufacturing UNIMECH.NSIndia$937M+63%+40%27%61.6×n/an/a
Shenzhen Dobot 2432.HKHong Kong$937M-50%+67%-33%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Seer Intelligent Technology 6106.HKHong Kong$940Mn/a+30%-12%n/an/an/a
Jiangyin Hengrun Heavy Industries 603985.SSChina$942M-45%-20%9%n/an/an/a
KraussMaffei 600579.SSChina$888M-15%-22%0%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Jinggong Integration Technology 002006.SZChina$946M-31%-12%5%21.6×28.8%+9.6%
SUSS MicroTec SMHN.DEGermany$948M-53%-15%9%35.8×24.2%+14.8%
Jin Tong Ling Technology 300091.SZChina$882M-36%-40%-72%n/an/an/a
Manitou BF MTU.PAFrance$882M-6%+8%6%8.6×-3.6%+10.1%
Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology 603890.SSChina$880M-38%+7%6%13.0×5.2%+4.2%

Graham backlog

Graham reported $561M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 12% from a year earlier and up 1% from the previous quarter. That is 2.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.06.

Questions

Who are Graham's main competitors?
Named competitors: Curtiss-Wright (CW), BWX Technologies (BWXT), Chart Industries (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kitz (6498.T), Tianjin Motor Dies (002510.SZ), Qingdao Gaoce Technology (688556.SS), Dynamatic Technologies (DYNAMATECH.NS), Mesnac (002073.SZ), Galilei (6420.T).
Is Graham expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 44.8× against a peer median of 14.8×, 3rd most expensive of 13 in its peer set.
How has Graham stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.5% against -17.7% for the median peer; over one year +22.0%.
What is Graham's backlog?
Graham's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $561M at 30 Sep 2026, +12% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.