Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DYNAMATECH.NS Dynamatic Technologies LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Dynamatic Technologies LimitedDYNAMATECH.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Capital Goods›Industrial Machinery
Momentum strong 70
Mkt cap
$922M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
62%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.82M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
88.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.8 pp
WACC 14.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · INR₹12,822
1D-0.8%
1W+10.5%
1M-6.6%
3M+12.4%
6M+3.4%
YTD+36.8%
1Y+67.0%
ATR %4.7%
Beta1.08
52w lowhigh11.6% off high

What Dynamatic Technologies does

Employees: 1,744

Dynamatic Technologies at a glance

Size Dynamatic Technologies (DYNAMATECH.NS) is an India Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $922M, the 617th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹12,822 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 3.4%, against -17.7% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.3%); the operating margin is 7.3% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 88.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.3× (most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.8 points below its cost of capital (14.3% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026DYNAMATECH.NS 102Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Dynamatic Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dynamatic Technologies financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹16.8B₹16.2B₹14.0B₹14.3B₹13.2B
Revenue growth—+16%-2%+9%—
Gross profit₹4.29B₹2.27B₹1.91B₹2.06B₹1.86B
EBITDA₹2.00B₹1.85B₹1.58B₹1.66B₹1.73B
Net income₹424M₹324M₹430M₹1.22B₹428M
Free cash flown/a-₹198M₹309M-₹353M-₹59.2M
Capital expendituren/a₹660M₹666M₹749M₹849M
Total debtn/a₹6.38B₹5.71B₹5.85B₹7.54B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dynamatic Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%6885560020736420002510GHM6498688155UNIMECH2432BANCOINDIA603985300470002006TCWSMHN003036600579600604300091DYNAMATECH.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dynamatic Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×0020736420GHM6498688155UNIMECH300470002006TCWSMHNDYNAMATECH.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Dynamatic Technologies is the large dot.

Dynamatic Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How Dynamatic Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dynamatic Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDYNAMATECH.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.6%-4.9%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+3.4%-17.7%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-11.6%-39.3%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.3%+6.3%8th highest of 21
Operating margin7.3%5.8%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E88.0×16.3×most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.8 pp-3.1 pp10th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA43.6×12.0×2nd most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA2.9×-0.4×most indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Dynamatic Technologies DYNAMATECH.NSIndia$922M+3%+17%7%88.0×n/an/a
Qingdao Gaoce Technology 688556.SSChina$922M-45%+5%-17%n/a8.8%+37.4%
Mesnac 002073.SZChina$923M-11%+18%4%14.7×-3.2%+21.6%
Galilei 6420.TJapan$925M-3%+4%13%10.7×n/an/a
Tianjin Motor Dies 002510.SZChina$918M-10%+5%-1%n/a33.8%+12.2%
Graham GHMUnited States$916M-21%+21%7%44.8×n/an/a
Kitz 6498.TJapan$915M-21%+8%8%10.1×4.3%+9.5%
Shanghai SK Automation Technology 688155.SSChina$936M-53%+56%15%17.6×5.3%+43.3%
Unimech Aerospace & Manufacturing UNIMECH.NSIndia$937M+63%+40%27%61.6×n/an/a
Shenzhen Dobot 2432.HKHong Kong$937M-50%+67%-33%n/an/an/a
Banco Products (India) BANCOINDIA.NSIndia$905M-7%+22%14%n/a24.8%+20.6%
Shanghai Seer Intelligent Technology 6106.HKHong Kong$940Mn/a+30%-12%n/an/an/a
Jiangyin Hengrun Heavy Industries 603985.SSChina$942M-45%-20%9%n/an/an/a
Sinoseal 300470.SZChina$903M-18%+1%20%14.9×-0.7%+13.9%
Zhejiang Jinggong Integration Technology 002006.SZChina$946M-31%-12%5%21.6×28.8%+9.6%
Trican Well Service TCW.TOCanada$899M-10%+15%14%9.3×-11.5%+22.5%
SUSS MicroTec SMHN.DEGermany$948M-53%-15%9%35.8×24.2%+14.8%
Zhejiang Taitan 003036.SZChina$953M-10%+14%2%n/an/an/a
KraussMaffei 600579.SSChina$888M-15%-22%0%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Shibei Hi-Tech 600604.SSChina$960M-13%-26%4%n/a15.1%-1.7%
Jin Tong Ling Technology 300091.SZChina$882M-36%-40%-72%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Dynamatic Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Qingdao Gaoce Technology (688556.SS), Mesnac (002073.SZ), Galilei (6420.T), Tianjin Motor Dies (002510.SZ), Graham (GHM), Kitz (6498.T), Shanghai SK Automation Technology (688155.SS), Unimech Aerospace & Manufacturing (UNIMECH.NS).
Is Dynamatic Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 88.0× against a peer median of 16.3×, most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has Dynamatic Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +3.4% against -17.7% for the median peer; over one year +67.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.