Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6498.T Kitz CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kitz Corporation6498.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Japanese maker of industrial valves used in water, energy, chemical and building-services piping systems.

≈ Japan's Crane Co. for valvesMomentum laggard 9
Mkt cap
$915M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
68%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.05M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.6 pp
WACC 8.0%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,662
1D-5.2%
1W-12.7%
1M-22.2%
3M-25.5%
6M-20.6%
YTD-4.4%
1Y-3.5%
ATR %4.4%
52w lowhigh39.1% off high

What Kitz does

Japanese maker of industrial valves used in water, energy, chemical and building-services piping systems.

Sells valves through trading firms and distributors, with replacement and repair demand from installed pipework steadier than the new-plant orders that drive large steel valves. Bronze and brass valves for building services sell in large numbers, while steel valves for chemical, energy and power plants are higher-value and project-driven.

In one line: Japan's Crane Co. for valves.

Products and services

  • Bronze/brass valves
  • Steel/high-performance valves
  • Actuators

Customers

  • Water utilities
  • Chemical plants
  • Construction/building services firms

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Capital goods
  • Industrial valves
  • Bronze/steel valves for piping systems

What could go right

  • Water infrastructure renewal
  • Chemical/energy capex

What could go wrong

  • Construction cyclicality
  • Raw material (copper/steel) costs

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, installed base). Long-standing brand and distribution in Japan's valve market; less differentiated abroad.

Headquarters: Chiba, Japan · Founded: 1951 · Employees: 5,469

Named competitors

Kitz at a glance

Size Kitz (6498.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $915M, the 771st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,662 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.6%, against -17.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.2%); the operating margin is 8.3% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 10.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.3× (3rd cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.6 points below its cost of capital (8.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 826498.T 79
Six months, rebased to 100: Kitz against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kitz financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥189B¥177B¥172B¥167B¥160B
Revenue growth—+3%+3%+4%—
Gross profit¥48.8B¥45.8B¥43.9B¥42.4B¥37.9B
EBITDA¥23.2B¥22.6B¥21.3B¥21.1B¥18.0B
Net income¥12.0B¥11.5B¥11.8B¥10.6B¥8.55B
Free cash flow¥4.64B¥3.24B¥9.15B¥7.66B¥1.52B
Capital expenditure¥10.0B¥11.3B¥10.1B¥8.89B¥7.41B
Total debt¥52.4B¥37.0B¥36.1B¥37.9B¥38.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kitz competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%GHM002510688556DYNAMATECH002073BANCOINDIA6420300470TCW688155UNIMECH2432603985600579002006SMHN300091MTU6038906498.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kitz is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×GHMDYNAMATECH0020736420300470TCW688155UNIMECH002006SMHNMTU6038906498.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kitz is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%002510688556002073BANCOINDIA300470TCW688155002006SMHNMTU6038906498.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kitz is the large dot.

Kitz competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6498.T vs CR vs FLS vs 6361.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kitz 6498.T$915M-21%+8%8%10.1×4.3%
Crane CR$11.6B+11%+22%18%25.8×17.5%
Flowserve FLS$10.2B+13%0%14%17.8×15.0%
Ebara 6361.T$9.28B-40%+9%11%14.5×n/a

How Kitz compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kitz against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6498.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.2%-4.4%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-20.6%-17.7%9th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-39.1%-36.8%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.0%+7.2%10th highest of 21
Operating margin8.3%6.3%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E10.1×16.3×3rd cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.3%5.3%5th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.5%+14.8%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.2 pp-13.7 pp6th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.6 pp-2.8 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.1×13.3×4th cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×-0.1×3rd most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kitz 6498.TJapan$915M-21%+8%8%10.1×4.3%+9.5%
Graham GHMUnited States$916M-21%+21%7%44.8×n/an/a
Tianjin Motor Dies 002510.SZChina$918M-10%+5%-1%n/a33.8%+12.2%
Qingdao Gaoce Technology 688556.SSChina$922M-45%+5%-17%n/a8.8%+37.4%
Dynamatic Technologies DYNAMATECH.NSIndia$922M+3%+17%7%88.0×n/an/a
Mesnac 002073.SZChina$923M-11%+18%4%14.7×-3.2%+21.6%
Banco Products (India) BANCOINDIA.NSIndia$905M-7%+22%14%n/a24.8%+20.6%
Galilei 6420.TJapan$925M-3%+4%13%10.7×n/an/a
Sinoseal 300470.SZChina$903M-18%+1%20%14.9×-0.7%+13.9%
Trican Well Service TCW.TOCanada$899M-10%+15%14%9.3×-11.5%+22.5%
Shanghai SK Automation Technology 688155.SSChina$936M-53%+56%15%17.6×5.3%+43.3%
Unimech Aerospace & Manufacturing UNIMECH.NSIndia$937M+63%+40%27%61.6×n/an/a
Shenzhen Dobot 2432.HKHong Kong$937M-50%+67%-33%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Seer Intelligent Technology 6106.HKHong Kong$940Mn/a+30%-12%n/an/an/a
Jiangyin Hengrun Heavy Industries 603985.SSChina$942M-45%-20%9%n/an/an/a
KraussMaffei 600579.SSChina$888M-15%-22%0%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Jinggong Integration Technology 002006.SZChina$946M-31%-12%5%21.6×28.8%+9.6%
SUSS MicroTec SMHN.DEGermany$948M-53%-15%9%35.8×24.2%+14.8%
Jin Tong Ling Technology 300091.SZChina$882M-36%-40%-72%n/an/an/a
Manitou BF MTU.PAFrance$882M-6%+8%6%8.6×-3.6%+10.1%
Suzhou Chunqiu Electronic Technology 603890.SSChina$880M-38%+7%6%13.0×5.2%+4.2%

Questions

Who are Kitz's main competitors?
Named competitors: Crane Co. (CR), Flowserve (FLS), Ebara (6361.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Graham (GHM), Tianjin Motor Dies (002510.SZ), Qingdao Gaoce Technology (688556.SS), Dynamatic Technologies (DYNAMATECH.NS), Mesnac (002073.SZ), Banco Products (India) (BANCOINDIA.NS).
Is Kitz expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.1× against a peer median of 16.3×, 3rd cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Kitz stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.6% against -17.7% for the median peer; over one year -3.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.