Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DOV.MI doValue S.p.A.Open in the cockpit ↗

doValue S.p.A.DOV.MICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Italy · EUR·Financials›Finance/Rental/Leasing
Momentum weak 30
Mkt cap
$381M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.74M
20-day average traded
P/B
2.23×
price to book
ROE
-14.8%
delivered
Implied ROE
27.8%
what the price asks
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · EUR€1.79
1D+0.5%
1W+7.0%
1M-2.2%
3M-0.6%
6M-16.1%
YTD-40.4%
1Y-31.4%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh43.0% off high

What doValue does

Employees: 3,387

doValue at a glance

Size doValue (DOV.MI) is an Italy Financials company (Finance/Rental/Leasing) with a market value of $381M, the 115th largest of 123 Italy companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €1.79 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.1%, against +4.9% for the median peer and +3.1% for the Italy market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.9%); the operating margin is 9.6% (peer median 24.4%).

Valuation It trades at 2.23× book value against a peer median of 1.28× (6th most expensive of 20).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 27.8%; doValue delivers -14.8%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 104DOV.MI 81
Six months, rebased to 100: doValue against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

doValue financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€599M€583M€485M€487M€564M
Revenue growth—+20%0%-14%—
Gross profit€437M€465M€401M€396M€448M
EBITDA€170M€210M€134M€156M€166M
Net income-€25.8M-€8.21M€1.90M-€18.3M€16.5M
Free cash flow€50.6M€129M€67.0M€63.1M€57.9M
Capital expenditure€39.4M€38.9M€23.8M€21.4M€31.1M
Total debt€1.06B€982M€777M€630M€618M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

doValue competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%0%+20%9619823923939991AYEAIZDCBETRENITYWSBFBFFCCAPSANGHVIMOV0412ASAIDOV.MI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. doValue is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-200%-100%0%00×500×1000×961982392393BETRASAIDOV.MIReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. doValue is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%500%1,000%0%500%1,000%961982392393BETRDOV.MIROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. doValue is the large dot.

doValue competitors and peer comparison

How doValue compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

doValue against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDOV.MIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.2%+0.5%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-16.1%+4.9%6th lowest of 19
Return on equity-14.8%8.9%3rd lowest of 17
Price / book2.23×1.28×6th most expensive of 20
ROE the price implies27.8%8.0%6th most demanding of 20
ROE delivered-14.8%8.8%3rd lowest of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
doValue DOV.MIItaly$381M-16%+9%-15%2.23×27.8%-14.8%
Ichinen 9619.TJapan$381M+19%+6%18%0.77×4.8%17.6%
Capital Finance 8239.HKHong Kong$380M+111%+31%-76%133.31×990.3%-75.7%
Nippon Care Supply 2393.TJapan$385M+76%+10%14%3.28×9.9%13.5%
GECOSS 9991.TJapan$376M+9%+5%9%0.83×6.1%8.8%
Aye Finance AYE.NSIndia$385M+4%+22%13%1.33×30.9%13.1%
Atrium Mortgage Investment AI.TOCanada$390M-7%-11%9%1.03×8.0%9.1%
Zedcor ZDC.VCanada$390M-19%+71%-1%5.69×27.7%-1.2%
Better Home & Finance BETRUnited States$366M-34%+41%-224%6.31×68.0%-224.0%
Enity ENITY.STSweden$401M+13%n/a9%0.67×3.8%9.2%
Waterstone Financial WSBFUnited States$357M+6%+5%9%1.02×8.8%8.7%
BFF Bank BFF.MIItaly$417M-21%-18%2%0.47×8.2%2.3%
Crescent Capital BDC CCAPUnited States$346M-31%-29%0%0.53×5.6%-0.5%
Sanghvi Movers SANGHVIMOV.NSIndia$343M+11%+30%15%2.47×34.6%n/a
Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. VI IPFXUnited States$343Mn/an/an/a1.41×7.7%n/a
China Aircraft Leasing 1848.HKHong Kong$340M-11%+19%8%0.57×6.3%8.4%
KRAKacquisition KRAQUnited States$432M+1%n/an/a1.31×7.4%n/a
Shandong Hi-Speed 0412.HKHong Kong$334M-65%-15%n/an/an/an/a
ASA International ASAI.LUnited Kingdom$332M+28%+25%45%1.69×30.5%44.9%
Idea Acquisition IACOUnited States$438Mn/an/an/a1.28×7.3%n/a
Sankyo Frontier 9639.TJapan$331M+6%+4%11%0.97×5.8%11.5%

Questions

Which companies are doValue's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Ichinen (9619.T), Capital Finance (8239.HK), Nippon Care Supply (2393.T), GECOSS (9991.T), Aye Finance (AYE.NS), Atrium Mortgage Investment (AI.TO), Zedcor (ZDC.V), Better Home & Finance (BETR).
Is doValue expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 2.23× against a peer median of 1.28×, 6th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 27.8%; doValue delivers -14.8%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has doValue stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.1% against +4.9% for the median peer; over one year -31.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.