Loading…

CTS CorporationCTSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Maker of sensors, actuators and electronic components for aerospace, defense, industrial and transportation customers.

Momentum neutral 42
Mkt cap
$1.65B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.5 pp
WACC 9.4%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · USD$57.87
1D+1.7%
1W-5.5%
1M+1.0%
3M-10.4%
6M-6.3%
YTD+35.0%
1Y+33.8%
ATR %4.0%
Beta1.51
52w lowhigh16.8% off high

What CTS does

Maker of sensors, actuators and electronic components for aerospace, defense, industrial and transportation customers.

Parts are designed in for a specific platform and supplied for its life, with aerospace and defense programs lasting far longer than vehicle models. Its own piezoelectric ceramics, materials that change shape under electricity or generate it under pressure, go into sensors and actuators, giving it control of a key input.

Products and services

  • Sensors
  • Actuators
  • Electronic components (resonators, switches)

Customers

  • Aerospace/defense OEMs
  • Automotive/transportation OEMs
  • Industrial/medical equipment makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information technology
  • Sensor/actuator manufacturing
  • Aerospace, defense and transportation…

What could go right

  • Vehicle electrification content growth
  • Aerospace/defense production increases

What could go wrong

  • Automotive production cyclicality
  • Customer concentration

Moat: narrow (switching costs, process know-how). Components are designed into long-lived aerospace/industrial platforms, making resourcing costly.

Headquarters: Lisle, Illinois, US · Founded: 1896 · Employees: 3,492

Named competitors

CTS at a glance

Size CTS (CTS) is a United States Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $1.65B, the 1922nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $57.87 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 6.3%, against -25.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.0%); the operating margin is 16.3% (peer median 8.5%).

Valuation It trades at 20.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 28.2× (6th cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.5 points above its cost of capital (9.4% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $8.60M at 31 Dec 2025 — 0.0 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 4.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CTS 94Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: CTS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CTS financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$572M$542M$515M$551M$587M
Revenue growth—+5%-7%-6%—
Gross profit$227M$209M$187M$188M$210M
EBITDA$128M$119M$106M$108M$124M
Net income$73.9M$65.3M$55.5M$60.5M$59.6M
Free cash flow$108M$86.4M$79.6M$74.1M$107M
Capital expenditure$15.2M$15.7M$18.6M$14.7M$14.3M
Total debt$88.8M$82.8M$118M$96.9M$109M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CTS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%300593PLAB688332300820300693AEHR2455300735300319NOLA-B603738000727KITPLUG0000320022893362603042CTS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CTS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×100×200×300×300593PLAB6883323008203006932455300735300319NOLA-B603738KIT3009763042CTSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CTS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%PLAB3008203006932455300735300319NOLA-B603738KIT0000320022893009763042CTSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. CTS is the large dot.

CTS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CTS vs ST vs TEL vs APH)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
CTS CTS$1.65B-6%+7%16%20.3×8.5%
Sensata Technologies ST$5.72B-13%+4%16%9.9×5.2%
TE Connectivity TEL$59.5B+1%+15%22%15.1×8.2%
Amphenol APH$184B+21%+58%29%21.6×15.7%

How CTS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CTS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCTSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.0%-16.4%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-6.3%-25.7%5th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-16.8%-51.1%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.5%+11.0%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin16.3%8.5%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E20.3×28.2×6th cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.5%13.1%6th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.0%+10.3%4th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.4 pp+0.9 pp7th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.5 pp-2.8 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.4×13.5×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.4×-0.7×3rd most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
CTS CTSUnited States$1.65B-6%+7%16%20.3×8.5%+5.0%
Beijing Relpow Technology 300593.SZChina$1.68B-27%+16%-14%286.9×n/an/a
Photronics PLABUnited States$1.61B-49%+1%22%13.3×1.9%+6.9%
Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology 688332.SSChina$1.71B-17%+6%7%37.6×n/an/a
Sichuan Injet Electric 300820.SZChina$1.71B+4%-12%13%35.8×29.9%+29.0%
Shenzhen Sinexcel Electric 300693.SZChina$1.57B-28%+27%15%17.2×13.1%+35.0%
Aehr Test Systems AEHRUnited States$1.75B-45%-15%-28%n/an/an/a
Visual Photonics Epitaxy 2455.TWTaiwan$1.80B-17%+34%26%34.1×38.7%+5.0%
DBG Technology 300735.SZChina$1.81B-28%+17%2%26.0×3.5%+31.6%
Shenzhen Microgate Technology 300319.SZChina$1.86B+12%+11%8%30.5×22.5%+10.3%
Suzhou Betely Polymer Materials 301697.SZChina$1.44Bn/a+45%5%n/an/an/a
Nolato NOLA-B.STSweden$1.40B+5%0%10%18.8×3.9%+0.2%
TKD Science and Technology 603738.SSChina$1.39B-37%+20%9%42.5×44.4%+8.4%
TPV Technology 000727.SZChina$1.38B-23%+7%-1%n/an/an/a
Kitron KIT.OLNorway$2.02B-20%+54%10%22.0×-0.6%+16.9%
Plug Power PLUGUnited States$2.03B-54%+11%-68%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen SED Industry 000032.SZChina$2.03B-36%+5%1%42.9×7.0%+8.9%
Shenzhen Success Electronics 002289.SZChina$1.33B-9%+237%27%n/a24.4%+18.8%
Dongguan Tarry Electronics 300976.SZChina$1.33B+4%+19%9%15.3×17.5%+27.2%
Doosan Fuel Cell 336260.KSSouth Korea$1.33B-56%-19%-31%n/an/an/a
TXC 3042.TWTaiwan$1.28B-26%+9%17%14.4×10.7%+3.9%

CTS backlog

CTS reported $8.60M of remaining performance obligations at 31 Dec 2025. That is 0.0 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are CTS's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sensata Technologies (ST), TE Connectivity (TEL), Amphenol (APH). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Beijing Relpow Technology (300593.SZ), Photronics (PLAB), Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology (688332.SS), Sichuan Injet Electric (300820.SZ), Shenzhen Sinexcel Electric (300693.SZ), Aehr Test Systems (AEHR).
Is CTS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.3× against a peer median of 28.2×, 6th cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has CTS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -6.3% against -25.7% for the median peer; over one year +33.8%.
What is CTS's backlog?
CTS's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $8.60M at 31 Dec 2025.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.