Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688332.SS Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology Co., Ltd. Class A688332.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Chinese fabless designer of Bluetooth audio chips used in true-wireless earbuds and wearable speakers.

≈ A China-based Qualcomm/Airoha (MediaTek) in Bluetooth audio SoCsMomentum weak 22
Mkt cap
$1.71B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$46.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
37.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.4 pp
WACC 10.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
159 days
14 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥63.74
1D-6.3%
1W+3.0%
1M-20.2%
3M-19.1%
6M-16.9%
YTD-28.2%
1Y-37.2%
ATR %8.8%
52w lowhigh60.8% off high

What Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology does

Chinese fabless designer of Bluetooth audio chips used in true-wireless earbuds and wearable speakers.

Designs the chips and leaves manufacturing to outside foundries, so it needs little factory investment but sells at low unit prices in large volumes. The earbud chip carries the business, and its buyers are brands that compete mainly on cost, which keeps pricing tight.

In one line: A China-based Qualcomm/Airoha (MediaTek) in Bluetooth audio SoCs.

Products and services

  • TWS earbuds Bluetooth SoCs
  • Wearable/speaker audio chips
  • Smart audio/voice chips

Customers

  • Chinese TWS earbuds and wearable device brands

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Fabless chip design
  • Bluetooth audio SoCs

What could go right

  • TWS earbuds/wearables volume growth

What could go wrong

  • Intense pricing competition in commodity audio SoCs

Moat: none (IP / patents). Fabless chip designer in a crowded, price-competitive Bluetooth audio SoC market.

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Founded: 2011 · Employees: 344

Named competitors

Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology at a glance

Size Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology (688332.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $1.71B, the 1464th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥63.74 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.9%, against -23.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.4%); the operating margin is 7.4% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 37.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.0× (4th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.4 points below its cost of capital (10.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 14 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026688332.SS 82Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.99BCN¥1.84BCN¥1.81BCN¥1.44BCN¥1.08B
Revenue growth—+1%+26%+34%—
Gross profitCN¥430MCN¥384MCN¥395MCN¥306MCN¥208M
EBITDAn/aCN¥177MCN¥176MCN¥111MCN¥90.5M
Net incomeCN¥1.21BCN¥1.42BCN¥300MCN¥252MCN¥141M
Free cash flow-CN¥84.7MCN¥148MCN¥454M-CN¥46.7MCN¥219M
Capital expenditureCN¥65.8MCN¥25.2MCN¥16.3MCN¥11.5MCN¥13.1M
Total debtCN¥524MCN¥143MCN¥358MCN¥855MCN¥6.75M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%300820300593AEHRCTSPLAB2455300735300693300319KITPLUG000032NOLA-B603738000727002925BHE002289688332.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×100×200×300×300820300593CTSPLAB2455300735300693300319KIT000032NOLA-B603738002925BHE688332.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology is the large dot.

Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688332.SS vs QCOM vs 2454.TW vs 300582.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology 688332.SS$1.71B-17%+6%7%37.6×n/a
Qualcomm QCOM$177B-24%+2%24%17.0×15.9%
Mediatek 2454.TW$164B+7%+6%15%24.7×40.7%
Inventronics (Hangzhou) 300582.SZ$424M-35%-4%-20%n/an/a

How Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688332.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.2%-13.4%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-16.9%-23.4%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-60.8%-49.5%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.1%+14.4%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.4%8.8%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E37.6×26.0×4th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.4 pp-2.3 pp5th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology 688332.SSChina$1.71B-17%+6%7%37.6×n/an/a
Sichuan Injet Electric 300820.SZChina$1.71B+4%-12%13%35.8×29.9%+29.0%
Beijing Relpow Technology 300593.SZChina$1.68B-27%+16%-14%286.9×n/an/a
Aehr Test Systems AEHRUnited States$1.75B-45%-15%-28%n/an/an/a
CTS CTSUnited States$1.65B-6%+7%16%20.3×8.5%+5.0%
Photronics PLABUnited States$1.61B-49%+1%22%13.3×1.9%+6.9%
Visual Photonics Epitaxy 2455.TWTaiwan$1.80B-17%+34%26%34.1×38.7%+5.0%
DBG Technology 300735.SZChina$1.81B-28%+17%2%26.0×3.5%+31.6%
Shenzhen Sinexcel Electric 300693.SZChina$1.57B-28%+27%15%17.2×13.1%+35.0%
Shenzhen Microgate Technology 300319.SZChina$1.86B+12%+11%8%30.5×22.5%+10.3%
Suzhou Betely Polymer Materials 301697.SZChina$1.44Bn/a+45%5%n/an/an/a
Kitron KIT.OLNorway$2.02B-20%+54%10%22.0×-0.6%+16.9%
Plug Power PLUGUnited States$2.03B-54%+11%-68%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen SED Industry 000032.SZChina$2.03B-36%+5%1%42.9×7.0%+8.9%
Nolato NOLA-B.STSweden$1.40B+5%0%10%18.8×3.9%+0.2%
TKD Science and Technology 603738.SSChina$1.39B-37%+20%9%42.5×44.4%+8.4%
TPV Technology 000727.SZChina$1.38B-23%+7%-1%n/an/an/a
Xiamen Intretech 002925.SZChina$2.16B-3%+39%9%32.1×n/an/a
Benchmark Electronics BHEUnited States$2.16B-29%+13%4%17.7×13.8%+5.3%
Shenzhen Success Electronics 002289.SZChina$1.33B-9%+237%27%n/a24.4%+18.8%
Dongguan Tarry Electronics 300976.SZChina$1.33B+4%+19%9%15.3×17.5%+27.2%

Questions

Who are Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Qualcomm (QCOM), Airoha Technology (MediaTek) (2454.TW), Zhuhai Jieli Technology (300582.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sichuan Injet Electric (300820.SZ), Beijing Relpow Technology (300593.SZ), Aehr Test Systems (AEHR), CTS (CTS), Photronics (PLAB), Visual Photonics Epitaxy (2455.TW).
Is Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 37.6× against a peer median of 26.0×, 4th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Bluetrum Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.9% against -23.4% for the median peer; over one year -37.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.