Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3042.TW TXC CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

TXC Corporation3042.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Taiwanese maker of crystal oscillators and quartz timing components used across consumer, telecom and automotive electronics.

≈ A Taiwanese timing-component maker akin to a smaller AbraconMomentum laggard 11
Mkt cap
$1.28B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$42.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.2 pp
WACC 9.4%
Hurdle
+7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
131 days
17 Mar 2027
Close · TWDNT$123.00
1D-6.8%
1W-24.8%
1M-44.6%
3M-27.4%
6M-25.7%
YTD+53.0%
1Y+32.8%
ATR %9.8%
52w lowhigh50.8% off high

What TXC does

Taiwanese maker of crystal oscillators and quartz timing components used across consumer, telecom and automotive electronics.

Sells small components that almost every connected device needs for timing, so unit prices are low and volume and product mix drive earnings; automotive and telecom parts fetch more than consumer ones. Demand follows the cycle in phones, PCs and network equipment, with price pressure from rivals.

In one line: A Taiwanese timing-component maker akin to a smaller Abracon.

Products and services

  • Crystal oscillators
  • Quartz timing devices

Customers

  • Consumer electronics OEMs
  • Telecom/automotive electronics makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology hardware
  • Timing components
  • Crystal oscillators, quartz components

What could go right

  • Electronics/automotive content growth (timing devices)

What could go wrong

  • Component price cyclicality

Moat: narrow (process know-how, scale). Precision quartz-component manufacturing at scale, embedded in diverse electronics supply chains.

Headquarters: Taoyuan, Taiwan · Founded: 1972

Named competitors

TXC at a glance

Size TXC (3042.TW) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $1.28B, the 229th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$123.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 25.7%, against -23.4% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +19.7%); the operating margin is 16.6% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 14.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.0× (cheapest of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points above its cost of capital (9.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263042.TW 82Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: TXC against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

TXC financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$14.6BNT$13.3BNT$12.7BNT$10.9BNT$13.2B
Revenue growth—+5%+17%-18%—
Gross profitNT$5.57BNT$4.10BNT$4.19BNT$3.55BNT$4.73B
EBITDAn/aNT$3.25BNT$3.29BNT$3.07BNT$4.04B
Net incomeNT$2.16BNT$1.80BNT$2.14BNT$1.71BNT$2.81B
Free cash flown/aNT$2.29BNT$211MNT$2.20BNT$2.16B
Capital expendituren/aNT$1.23BNT$2.49BNT$976MNT$1.27B
Total debtn/aNT$2.07BNT$2.14BNT$4.01BNT$4.12B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

TXC competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%+25%31313009090029903362606886633009760022896006663006710026810007276037383014896880113009393006933042.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. TXC is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×3131688663300976603738NOLA-B30148924863006933042.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. TXC is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%3131688663300976002289600666002681005290603738NOLA-B3006933042.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. TXC is the large dot.

TXC competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3042.TW vs 6981.T vs 6971.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
TXC 3042.TW$1.28B-26%+9%17%14.4×10.7%
Murata Manufacturing 6981.T$57.1B-5%+15%20%23.0×29.8%
Kyocera 6971.T$23.4B+3%+7%6%22.5×21.3%

How TXC compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

TXC against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3042.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-44.6%-19.8%lowest of 21
6-month return-25.7%-23.4%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-50.8%-52.1%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.0%+19.7%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin16.6%5.9%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E14.4×21.0×cheapest of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)10.7%20.9%3rd least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.9%+13.6%4th lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.8 pp+4.6 pp5th most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.2 pp-4.4 pp5th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
TXC 3042.TWTaiwan$1.28B-26%+9%17%14.4×10.7%+3.9%
Grand Process Technology 3131.TWOTaiwan$1.27B-51%+38%22%18.3×13.0%+21.2%
Shenzhen Hui Chuang Da Technology 300909.SZChina$1.26B+4%+3%2%n/an/an/a
Maxvision Technology 002990.SZChina$1.26B-39%+36%14%n/an/an/a
Doosan Fuel Cell 336260.KSSouth Korea$1.33B-56%-19%-31%n/an/an/a
WindSun Science & Technology 688663.SSChina$1.23B-14%-9%3%36.5×48.5%+18.9%
Dongguan Tarry Electronics 300976.SZChina$1.33B+4%+19%9%15.3×17.5%+27.2%
Shenzhen Success Electronics 002289.SZChina$1.33B-9%+237%27%n/a24.4%+18.8%
Aurora Optoelectronics 600666.SSChina$1.22B-44%+44%-15%n/a35.2%-1.9%
Fuman Microelectronics 300671.SZChina$1.21B-22%+71%3%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Fenda Technology 002681.SZChina$1.19B-15%+7%-1%n/a27.1%-5.2%
Dongjin Semichem 005290.KSSouth Korea$1.18B-44%-4%16%n/a-4.4%+5.0%
TPV Technology 000727.SZChina$1.38B-23%+7%-1%n/an/an/a
TKD Science and Technology 603738.SSChina$1.39B-37%+20%9%42.5×44.4%+8.4%
Nolato NOLA-B.STSweden$1.40B+5%0%10%18.8×3.9%+0.2%
Guangdong Suqun New Material 301489.SZChina$1.16B-54%+24%8%53.2×n/an/a
Suzhou Betely Polymer Materials 301697.SZChina$1.44Bn/a+45%5%n/an/an/a
Harbin Xinguang Optic-Electronics Technology 688011.SSChina$1.11B+17%+14%-42%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen AV-Display 300939.SZChina$1.07B+54%+5%3%n/an/an/a
I-Chiun Precision Industry 2486.TWTaiwan$1.05B-53%+25%7%23.3×n/an/a
Shenzhen Sinexcel Electric 300693.SZChina$1.57B-28%+27%15%17.2×13.1%+35.0%

Questions

Who are TXC's main competitors?
Named competitors: TXC's peers: Nihon Dempa Kogyo (6981.T), Kyocera (Kyocera Crystal Device) (6971.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Grand Process Technology (3131.TWO), Shenzhen Hui Chuang Da Technology (300909.SZ), Maxvision Technology (002990.SZ), Doosan Fuel Cell (336260.KS), WindSun Science & Technology (688663.SS), Dongguan Tarry Electronics (300976.SZ).
Is TXC expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.4× against a peer median of 21.0×, cheapest of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has TXC stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -25.7% against -23.4% for the median peer; over one year +32.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.