Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002990.SZ Maxvision Technology Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Maxvision Technology Corp.002990.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Shenzhen maker of smart inspection systems for border, customs and airport checkpoints: self-service clearance, face recognition and port robots.

Momentum laggard 3
Mkt cap
$1.26B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$103M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-7.1 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥32.63
1D-5.7%
1W-0.8%
1M-37.7%
3M-19.9%
6M-39.4%
YTD+15.3%
1Y+15.8%
ATR %10.9%
52w lowhigh60.0% off high

What Maxvision Technology does

Shenzhen maker of smart inspection systems for border, customs and airport checkpoints: self-service clearance, face recognition and port robots.

Sells inspection systems and software projects to border-control and customs authorities, so revenue arrives in project and contract batches tied to port and airport upgrades. Land, sea and air checkpoints are the traditional base. The same face-recognition and automatic-check technology is being carried into smart airports and transport, into overseas ports, and into a new computing-power line.

Products and services

  • Self-service inspection and seamless-clearance systems
  • Customs passenger-inspection face recognition systems
  • Smart quarantine and inspection systems
  • Port service robots
  • Smart airport, traffic and computing-power projects

Customers

  • Border-inspection (immigration) authorities
  • Customs authorities
  • Airport and port operators
  • Transport and city-management agencies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Security technology
  • Smart-port and border inspection
  • Inspection systems and AI software

What could go right

  • Port and airport inspection upgrades
  • Overseas smart-port projects (Middle East, Africa)

What could go wrong

  • Dependence on government project budgets
  • Lumpy project timing

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, switching costs). Long track record with border and customs agencies; systems embedded in port workflows are costly to replace.

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Employees: 1,268

Named competitors

Maxvision Technology at a glance

Size Maxvision Technology (002990.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $1.26B, the 1897th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥32.63 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.4%, against -23.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 35.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.6%); the operating margin is 14.4% (peer median 4.0%).

Valuation It trades at 6.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.8× (7th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.1 points below its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77002990.SZ 56
Six months, rebased to 100: Maxvision Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Maxvision Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.71BCN¥1.44BCN¥1.22BCN¥1.57BCN¥986M
Revenue growth—+18%-22%+59%—
Gross profitCN¥754MCN¥521MCN¥503MCN¥597MCN¥385M
EBITDAn/aCN¥65.6MCN¥158MCN¥203MCN¥68.4M
Net incomeCN¥221MCN¥85.3MCN¥175MCN¥198MCN¥96.7M
Free cash flow-CN¥3.87BCN¥120MCN¥77.6M-CN¥86.9M-CN¥191M
Capital expenditureCN¥995MCN¥50.4MCN¥24.2MCN¥213MCN¥42.9M
Total debtCN¥3.55BCN¥300MCN¥156MCN¥285MCN¥293M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Maxvision Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%+25%30090931313042688663600666300671336260300976002289002681005290301489000727603738688011300939603052002990.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Maxvision Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%5×10×300909313130426886636006663006713362603009760022890026810052903014890007276037386880113016973009392486603052002990.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Maxvision Technology is the large dot.

Maxvision Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002990.SZ vs HO.PA vs 6701.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Maxvision Technology 002990.SZ$1.26B-39%+36%14%6.6×n/a
Thales HO.PA$51.1B-1%+7%11%2.0×-2.8%
Nec 6701.T$36.3B+5%+7%12%1.6×5.5%

How Maxvision Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Maxvision Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002990.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-37.7%-23.2%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-39.4%-23.4%8th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-60.0%-51.0%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+35.5%+11.6%6th highest of 21
Operating margin14.4%4.0%5th highest of 21
EV / Sales6.6×4.8×7th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.1 pp-4.4 pp7th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Maxvision Technology 002990.SZChina$1.26B-39%+36%14%6.6×n/an/a
Shenzhen Hui Chuang Da Technology 300909.SZChina$1.26B+4%+3%2%5.6×n/an/a
Grand Process Technology 3131.TWOTaiwan$1.27B-51%+38%22%5.5×13.0%+21.2%
TXC 3042.TWTaiwan$1.28B-26%+9%17%2.9×10.7%+3.9%
WindSun Science & Technology 688663.SSChina$1.23B-14%-9%3%4.2×48.5%+18.9%
Aurora Optoelectronics 600666.SSChina$1.22B-44%+44%-15%13.6×35.2%-1.9%
Fuman Microelectronics 300671.SZChina$1.21B-22%+71%3%6.4×n/an/a
Doosan Fuel Cell 336260.KSSouth Korea$1.33B-56%-19%-31%3.8×n/an/a
Dongguan Tarry Electronics 300976.SZChina$1.33B+4%+19%9%2.2×17.5%+27.2%
Shenzhen Success Electronics 002289.SZChina$1.33B-9%+237%27%11.9×24.4%+18.8%
Shenzhen Fenda Technology 002681.SZChina$1.19B-15%+7%-1%3.0×27.1%-5.2%
Dongjin Semichem 005290.KSSouth Korea$1.18B-44%-4%16%1.2×-4.4%+5.0%
Guangdong Suqun New Material 301489.SZChina$1.16B-54%+24%8%6.7×n/an/a
TPV Technology 000727.SZChina$1.38B-23%+7%-1%0.5×n/an/a
TKD Science and Technology 603738.SSChina$1.39B-37%+20%9%8.3×44.4%+8.4%
Nolato NOLA-B.STSweden$1.40B+5%0%10%1.4×3.9%+0.2%
Harbin Xinguang Optic-Electronics Technology 688011.SSChina$1.11B+17%+14%-42%42.7×n/an/a
Suzhou Betely Polymer Materials 301697.SZChina$1.44Bn/a+45%5%2.6×n/an/a
Shenzhen AV-Display 300939.SZChina$1.07B+54%+5%3%5.0×n/an/a
I-Chiun Precision Industry 2486.TWTaiwan$1.05B-53%+25%7%4.6×n/an/a
Suzhou K-Hiragawa Electronic Technology 603052.SSChina$1.03B-55%+7%-10%7.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Maxvision Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Thales (HO.PA), NEC (6701.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shenzhen Hui Chuang Da Technology (300909.SZ), Grand Process Technology (3131.TWO), TXC (3042.TW), WindSun Science & Technology (688663.SS), Aurora Optoelectronics (600666.SS), Fuman Microelectronics (300671.SZ).
Is Maxvision Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 6.6× against a peer median of 4.8×, 7th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Maxvision Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.4% against -23.4% for the median peer; over one year +15.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.