Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6981.T Murata Manufacturing CoOpen in the cockpit ↗

Murata Manufacturing Co6981.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

World's largest maker of MLCC ceramic capacitors, plus batteries, RF modules and sensors for electronics.

≈ Japan's dominant capacitor maker — a much bigger AVX/KemetMomentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$57.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.05B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.4 pp
WACC 15.9%
Hurdle
+27 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
88 days
2 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥4,882
1D-3.0%
1W-29.1%
1M-44.7%
3M-31.8%
6M-5.3%
YTD+51.8%
1Y+67.0%
ATR %10.8%
52w lowhigh62.1% off high

What Murata Manufacturing does

World's largest maker of MLCC ceramic capacitors, plus batteries, RF modules and sensors for electronics.

Sells tiny components in huge numbers into phones, cars and computers, so earnings follow device production and the supply-demand balance for capacitors. It makes its own ceramic materials and much of its own production equipment, which protects its process. Apple is a major customer, and most sales go to Asia.

In one line: Japan's dominant capacitor maker — a much bigger AVX/Kemet.

Products and services

  • MLCC capacitors
  • RF/communication modules
  • Batteries
  • Sensors

Customers

  • Smartphone makers (Apple, Samsung)
  • Automakers (electrification)
  • Electronics OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information technology
  • Electronic components
  • Passive components + RF modules +…

What could go right

  • AI server/EV MLCC content growth
  • 5G smartphone module demand

What could go wrong

  • MLCC oversupply/price cycles
  • Smartphone unit demand cyclicality

Moat: wide (scale, process know-how, customer qualification). Global #1 MLCC share built on decades of ceramic materials process know-how and deep customer qualification.

Headquarters: Kyoto, Japan · Founded: 1944 · Employees: 74,302

Named competitors

Murata Manufacturing at a glance

Size Murata Manufacturing (6981.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $57.1B, the 29th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,882 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.3%, against -27.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +38.2%); the operating margin is 19.8% (peer median 16.8%).

Valuation It trades at 23.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.7× (most expensive of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +27 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.4 points below its cost of capital (15.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020025011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266981.T 95Peer median 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Murata Manufacturing against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Murata Manufacturing financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥2.02T¥1.83T¥1.74T¥1.64T¥1.69T
Revenue growth—+5%+6%-3%—
Gross profit¥893B¥733B¥683B¥604B¥642B
EBITDA¥586B¥496B¥462B¥435B¥462B
Net income¥288B¥234B¥234B¥181B¥244B
Free cash flow¥231B¥194B¥284B¥273B¥93.5B
Capital expenditure¥262B¥252B¥193B¥236B¥198B
Total debt¥54.9B¥55.8B¥60.0B¥106B¥155B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Murata Manufacturing competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%23082382TER3017FLEX23276981.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Murata Manufacturing is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%10×15×20×23082382TER3017FLEX23276981.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Murata Manufacturing is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%2308TER3017FLEX23270013996981.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Murata Manufacturing is the large dot.

Murata Manufacturing competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6981.T vs 6762.T vs 6976.T vs 009150.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Murata Manufacturing 6981.T$57.1B-5%+15%20%23.0×29.8%
Tdk 6762.T$25.4B-27%+25%10%15.0×18.2%
Taiyo Yuden 6976.T$5.63B+4%+6%6%28.8×47.0%
SamsungElecMech 009150.KS$47.2B+5%+22%12%38.7×42.8%
Yageo 2327.TW$23.3B+8%+32%27%13.9×17.7%

How Murata Manufacturing compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Murata Manufacturing against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6981.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-44.7%-39.2%3rd lowest of 8
6-month return-5.3%-27.0%2nd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-62.1%-58.2%3rd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.5%+38.2%2nd lowest of 8
Operating margin19.8%16.8%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E23.0×15.7×most expensive of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)29.8%18.1%2nd most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.3%+14.5%2nd lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+27.4 pp+8.5 ppmost demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.4 pp+16.0 pp2nd lowest of 8
EV / EBITDA14.4×18.0×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×0.4×least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Murata Manufacturing 6981.TJapan$57.1B-5%+15%20%23.0×29.8%+2.3%
Delta Electronic 2308.TWTaiwan$82.9B-51%+38%17%19.0×18.5%+14.4%
Quanta Computer 2382.TWTaiwan$36.0B-10%+63%3%10.1×n/an/a
Teradyne TERUnited States$34.1B-39%+75%33%20.2×20.9%+0.4%
Asia Vital Components 3017.TWTaiwan$27.4B-15%+99%24%17.5×9.0%+28.6%
Flex FLEXUnited States$25.8B-51%+18%6%11.2×15.9%+3.0%
Yageo 2327.TWTaiwan$23.3B+8%+32%27%13.9×17.7%+14.5%
HKC 001399.SZChina$18.2Bn/a+2%10%n/a30.7%+17.5%

Questions

Who are Murata Manufacturing's main competitors?
Named competitors: TDK Corp (6762.T), Taiyo Yuden (6976.T), Samsung Electro-Mechanics (009150.KS), Yageo Corporation (2327.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Delta Electronic (2308.TW), Quanta Computer (2382.TW), Teradyne (TER), Asia Vital Components (3017.TW), Flex (FLEX), Yageo (2327.TW).
Is Murata Manufacturing expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.0× against a peer median of 15.7×, most expensive of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +27 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Murata Manufacturing stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.3% against -27.0% for the median peer; over one year +67.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.