Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class ABAHCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services

Management/technology consulting firm serving primarily the US federal government (defense, intelligence, civil agencies) plus some commercial clients.

Momentum leader 81
Mkt cap
$10.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$167M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.6 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
-14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
77 days
22 Jan 2027
Close · USD$85.35
1D-4.4%
1W-3.5%
1M+17.1%
3M+9.6%
6M+10.8%
YTD+1.2%
1Y-1.4%
ATR %3.9%
Beta0.13
52w lowhigh21.8% off high

What Booz Allen Hamilton does

Management/technology consulting firm serving primarily the US federal government (defense, intelligence, civil agencies) plus some commercial clients.

Is paid by federal agencies for the hours of its cleared consultants and engineers under cost-reimbursement, time-and-materials and fixed-price contracts, so revenue tracks headcount, billing rates, and winning and renewing multiyear contracts. Nearly all its work is for the US government, with defense and intelligence the largest. Carlyle bought the business in 2008 and took it public in 2010.

Products and services

  • Defense consulting/technology
  • Intelligence community services
  • Civil government consulting

Customers

  • US Department of Defense
  • US intelligence agencies
  • Federal civilian agencies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials/IT services
  • Government consulting/IT services
  • Federal government technology and…

What could go right

  • Defense/intelligence AI modernization spending
  • Cybersecurity contract growth

What could go wrong

  • Federal budget/continuing-resolution uncertainty
  • Government efficiency-driven contract-cutting risk

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, switching costs, customer qualification). Security-cleared workforce and long-standing federal contract relationships/past-performance records are hard for new entrants to replicate.

Headquarters: McLean, Virginia, USA · Founded: 1914 · Employees: 31,500

Named competitors

Booz Allen Hamilton at a glance

Size Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) is a United States Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $10.1B, the 769th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $85.35 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 10.8%, against +4.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 6.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is 9.5% (peer median 14.2%).

Valuation It trades at 13.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.2× (6th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.6 points above its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $11.8B at 30 Sep 2026, down 2% on a year earlier — 1.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Booz Allen Hamilton has 6 bonds outstanding ($3.70B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 110 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 5.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026BAH 114Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: Booz Allen Hamilton against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Booz Allen Hamilton financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$11.0B$11.2B$12.0B$10.7B$9.26B
Revenue growth—-6%+12%+15%—
Gross profit$2.30B$2.35B$2.62B$2.29B$1.98B
EBITDA$1.22B$1.26B$1.43B$1.19B$713M
Net income$777M$845M$930M$601M$270M
Free cash flow$984M$951M$911M$192M$527M
Capital expenditure$92.0M$90.0M$98.0M$67.0M$76.1M
Total debt$4.71B$4.12B$4.22B$3.64B$3.06B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Booz Allen Hamilton competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%+40%SECU-B6532CAESPIERTO688818ITRKGBVIEDENELISCPUNEXI300803ERFROLBAH6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Booz Allen Hamilton is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%0×100×200×SECU-B6532CAESPIERTO688818ITRKALQGNEXI300803ROLBAHRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Booz Allen Hamilton is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%SECU-B6532CAESPIERTOITRKALQISSGAMCBVIEDENCPUNEXI300803BAHGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Booz Allen Hamilton is the large dot.

Booz Allen Hamilton competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BAH vs LDOS vs SAIC vs CACI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Booz Allen Hamilton BAH$10.1B+11%-6%9%13.3×-7.0%
Leidos LDOS$16.2B+2%+3%12%11.4×-6.4%
Science Applications International SAIC$6.13B+56%-1%8%14.3×-4.6%
CACI International CACI$13.6B+27%+10%10%17.6×7.3%

How Booz Allen Hamilton compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Booz Allen Hamilton against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBAHPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+17.1%+10.2%4th highest of 20
6-month return+10.8%+4.4%10th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-21.8%-14.0%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-6.2%+4.5%lowest of 21
Operating margin9.5%14.2%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E13.3×20.2×6th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.0%8.6%3rd least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.4%+10.5%7th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-14.3 pp-1.3 pp5th least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.6 pp+5.4 pp7th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA11.9×11.4×10th cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA3.6×1.8×most indebted of 19
Bond spread110 bp99 bp5th widest of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Booz Allen Hamilton BAHUnited States$10.1B+11%-6%9%13.3×-7.0%+7.4%
Securitas SECU-B.STSweden$9.22B+4%-5%7%12.3×-4.9%+7.5%
Baycurrent 6532.TJapan$11.2B+132%+32%33%35.6×6.4%+28.2%
CAE CAE.TOCanada$8.67B+3%+5%13%29.5×13.2%+10.5%
Spie SPIE.PAFrance$8.64B-8%+3%6%14.5×8.6%+9.3%
Rentokil Initial RTO.LUnited Kingdom$11.9B-26%0%14%16.9×8.2%+13.4%
CETC Lantian Technology 688818.SSChina$12.1B-33%+5%9%214.2×n/an/a
Intertek ITRK.LUnited Kingdom$12.3B+12%+4%18%22.3×14.8%+4.6%
ALS ALQ.AXAustralia$7.40B-3%+11%17%23.6×23.0%+13.5%
Iss A/s ISS.CODenmark$7.08B+13%+4%5%15.3×-6.1%+3.7%
Genpact GUnited States$7.07B+30%+7%16%9.9×-7.5%+6.5%
Airtel Mobile Commerce AMC.LUnited Kingdom$7.05Bn/a+30%48%n/a11.5%+30.3%
Bureau Veritas BVI.PAFrance$14.9B+13%+2%15%20.2×7.9%+7.0%
Edenred EDEN.PAFrance$6.52B+15%+3%30%12.0×-8.0%+13.9%
UL Solutions ULSUnited States$15.9B-22%+6%19%31.2×9.1%+5.8%
Elis ELIS.PAFrance$6.44B-12%+5%13%12.0×10.1%+11.3%
Computershare CPU.AXAustralia$17.2B+44%0%30%19.1×-2.6%+9.2%
Nexi NEXI.MIItaly$5.93B+18%+1%13%7.0×1.5%+30.5%
Beijing Compass Technology Development 300803.SZChina$5.91B-23%+12%0%174.6×46.9%+25.3%
Eurofins Scientific ERF.PAFrance$17.5B+49%+3%12%23.0×13.3%+6.1%
Rollins ROLUnited States$18.1B-29%+8%19%31.4×11.2%+11.7%

Booz Allen Hamilton bonds and credit

Booz Allen Hamilton has 6 bonds outstanding with $3.70B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.75%, a spread of 110 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Booz Allen Hamilton backlog

Booz Allen Hamilton reported $11.8B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 2% from a year earlier and up 6% from the previous quarter. That is 1.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.25.

Questions

Who are Booz Allen Hamilton's main competitors?
Named competitors: Leidos Holdings (LDOS), SAIC (SAIC), CACI International (CACI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Securitas (SECU-B.ST), Baycurrent (6532.T), CAE (CAE.TO), Spie (SPIE.PA), Rentokil Initial (RTO.L), CETC Lantian Technology (688818.SS).
Is Booz Allen Hamilton expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.3× against a peer median of 20.2×, 6th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Booz Allen Hamilton stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +10.8% against +4.4% for the median peer; over one year -1.4%.
What is Booz Allen Hamilton's backlog?
Booz Allen Hamilton's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $11.8B at 30 Sep 2026, -2% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.