Loading…

ALS Ltd.ALQ.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services

Global testing and inspection company providing laboratory analysis for mining/commodities, environmental and life-science customers.

≈ Australia's SGS/Bureau VeritasMomentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$7.40B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.0 pp
WACC 11.6%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
17 days
23 Nov 2026
Close · AUDA$21.05
1D-2.3%
1W+0.8%
1M+2.8%
3M-10.3%
6M-3.4%
YTD-4.5%
1Y-4.1%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh19.6% off high

What ALS does

Global testing and inspection company providing laboratory analysis for mining/commodities, environmental and life-science customers.

Charges per sample analyzed, so volume is the driver. The geochemistry unit that tests drill samples for explorers is the most cyclical, swinging with miners' exploration budgets, while environmental and life-science testing is steadier, driven by regulation and product testing. Growth has included buying laboratories.

In one line: Australia's SGS/Bureau Veritas.

Products and services

  • Geochemistry/mining sample testing
  • Environmental testing
  • Life sciences/pharma testing
  • Coal & mineral inspection

Customers

  • Mining/exploration companies
  • Environmental consultants
  • Pharma/life sciences companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Testing, inspection & certification
  • Commodities/mining lab testing
  • Life sciences + environmental testing

What could go right

  • Mining exploration spending cycle
  • Life sciences testing growth

What could go wrong

  • Mining exploration spending cyclicality
  • Currency exposure (global revenue)

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). Global accredited lab network and long sample chain-of-custody relationships with miners.

Headquarters: Brisbane, Australia · Employees: 23,342

Named competitors

ALS at a glance

Size ALS (ALQ.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $7.40B, the 47th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$21.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.4%, against +10.8% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.4%); the operating margin is 17.1% (peer median 12.8%).

Valuation It trades at 23.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.5× (5th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.0 points above its cost of capital (11.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 112ALQ.AX 95
Six months, rebased to 100: ALS against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

ALS financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueA$3.32BA$3.32BA$3.00BA$2.46BA$2.28B
Revenue growth—+11%+22%+8%—
Gross profitA$566MA$1.04BA$931MA$838MA$829M
EBITDAA$820MA$836MA$694MA$641MA$602M
Net incomeA$319MA$319MA$256MA$12.9MA$279M
Free cash flowA$232MA$232MA$252MA$208MA$297M
Capital expenditureA$263MA$263MA$165MA$152MA$146M
Total debtn/aA$1.57BA$2.09BA$1.87BA$1.45B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

ALS competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%+40%ISSGEDENELISSPIECAESECU-BNEXI300803REYBAHFCN6532AALBLTTSRTOALQ.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. ALS is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%+600%0×50×100×150×ISSGCAENEXI300803688192ALQ.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. ALS is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%ISSGAMCEDENELISSPIECAESECU-BNEXI300803REYFCN6532AALBLTTS688192RTOTEPBCOALQ.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. ALS is the large dot.

ALS competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ALQ.AX vs SGSN.SW vs BVI.PA vs ITRK.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
ALS ALQ.AX$7.40B-3%+11%17%23.6×23.0%
Sgs SGSN.SW$24.8B+21%+5%15%24.5×3.1%
Bureau Veritas BVI.PA$14.9B+13%+2%15%20.2×7.9%
Intertek ITRK.L$12.3B+12%+4%18%22.3×14.8%
Eurofins Scientific ERF.PA$17.5B+49%+3%12%23.0×13.3%

How ALS compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

ALS against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureALQ.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.8%+8.9%6th lowest of 20
6-month return-3.4%+10.8%5th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-19.6%-12.1%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.7%+4.4%5th highest of 21
Operating margin17.1%12.8%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E23.6×14.5×5th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)23.0%2.2%3rd most demanding of 21
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.5%+11.8%9th highest of 21
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.5 pp-12.0 pp4th most demanding of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.0 pp+6.1 pp7th lowest of 17
EV / EBITDA14.8×9.7×3rd most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×2.2×7th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
ALS ALQ.AXAustralia$7.40B-3%+11%17%23.6×23.0%+13.5%
Iss A/s ISS.CODenmark$7.08B+13%+4%5%15.3×-6.1%+3.7%
Genpact GUnited States$7.07B+30%+7%16%9.9×-7.5%+6.5%
Airtel Mobile Commerce AMC.LUnited Kingdom$7.05Bn/a+30%48%n/a11.5%+30.3%
Edenred EDEN.PAFrance$6.52B+15%+3%30%12.0×-8.0%+13.9%
Elis ELIS.PAFrance$6.44B-12%+5%13%12.0×10.1%+11.3%
Spie SPIE.PAFrance$8.64B-8%+3%6%14.5×8.6%+9.3%
CAE CAE.TOCanada$8.67B+3%+5%13%29.5×13.2%+10.5%
Securitas SECU-B.STSweden$9.22B+4%-5%7%12.3×-4.9%+7.5%
Nexi NEXI.MIItaly$5.93B+18%+1%13%7.0×1.5%+30.5%
Beijing Compass Technology Development 300803.SZChina$5.91B-23%+12%0%174.6×46.9%+25.3%
Reply REY.MIItaly$5.46B+41%+6%13%17.0×2.9%+14.4%
Booz Allen Hamilton BAHUnited States$10.1B+11%-6%9%13.3×-7.0%+7.4%
FTI Consulting FCNUnited States$5.33B+19%+8%10%18.7×-3.6%+9.0%
Baycurrent 6532.TJapan$11.2B+132%+32%33%35.6×6.4%+28.2%
Aalberts AALB.ASNetherlands$4.87B+6%0%10%14.6×12.9%+3.4%
L&T Technology Services LTTS.NSIndia$4.79B+13%+2%15%29.4×31.0%+15.1%
Dizal Pharmaceutical 688192.SSChina$4.68B+18%+720%69%9.5×-8.4%+95.9%
Rentokil Initial RTO.LUnited Kingdom$11.9B-26%0%14%16.9×8.2%+13.4%
Teleperformance TEP.PAFrance$4.60B+3%-3%10%5.0×-10.2%+12.2%
Brink's BCOUnited States$4.54B+3%+7%10%11.8×0.1%+7.3%

Questions

Who are ALS's main competitors?
Named competitors: SGS SA (SGSN.SW), Bureau Veritas (BVI.PA), Intertek Group (ITRK.L), Eurofins Scientific (ERF.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Iss A/s (ISS.CO), Genpact (G), Airtel Mobile Commerce (AMC.L), Edenred (EDEN.PA), Elis (ELIS.PA), Spie (SPIE.PA).
Is ALS expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.6× against a peer median of 14.5×, 5th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has ALS stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.4% against +10.8% for the median peer; over one year -4.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.