Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688648.SS China Post Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Post Technology Co., Ltd. Class A688648.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum leader 82
Mkt cap
$474M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$27.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-15.2 pp
WACC 10.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥33.16
1D-4.7%
1W+16.8%
1M+20.3%
3M+7.8%
6M-33.2%
YTD-46.0%
1Y-41.2%
ATR %9.0%
52w lowhigh54.6% off high

What China Post Technology does

Employees: 1,223

China Post Technology at a glance

Size China Post Technology (688648.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $474M, the 3986th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥33.16 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.2%, against -21.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 51.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.0%); the operating margin is -7.2% (peer median 9.0%).

Valuation It trades at 1.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.8× (3rd cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.2 points below its cost of capital (10.8% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 79688648.SS 66
Six months, rebased to 100: China Post Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China Post Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.71BCN¥1.38BCN¥910MCN¥1.95BCN¥2.22B
Revenue growth—+52%-53%-12%—
Gross profitCN¥206MCN¥97.4MCN¥53.3MCN¥277MCN¥311M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥90.8M-CN¥143MCN¥89.2MCN¥106M
Net income-CN¥93.8MCN¥627M-CN¥148MCN¥71.6MCN¥79.1M
Free cash flow-CN¥358M-CN¥404M-CN¥220M-CN¥14.5MCN¥85.1M
Capital expenditureCN¥47.1MCN¥181MCN¥43.8MCN¥48.9MCN¥113M
Total debtCN¥171MCN¥200MCN¥104MCN¥135MCN¥233M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Post Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%+20%3632GBG300148447596785036EQSHKD603232CRWGRVY688168002425BOKU225570DATAMATICS1INNNXLCSHR688648.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Post Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×10×20×GBG300148447596785036EQSHKD603232GRVY6881680024252255701INNNXL688579688648.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Post Technology is the large dot.

China Post Technology competitors and peer comparison

How China Post Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Post Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688648.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+20.3%-2.9%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-33.2%-21.2%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-54.6%-38.1%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+51.6%+9.0%highest of 20
Operating margin-7.2%9.0%6th lowest of 20
EV / Sales1.4×2.8×3rd cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-15.2 pp-6.4 pp5th lowest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
China Post Technology 688648.SSChina$474M-33%+52%-7%1.4×n/an/a
GREE Holdings.Inc 3632.TJapan$475M+20%-10%8%n/an/an/a
GB Group PLC GBG.LUnited Kingdom$472M-29%+1%11%1.5×4.6%+5.5%
Tangel Culture 300148.SZChina$472M-8%+9%9%4.7×25.6%-7.4%
Hennge K.k 4475.TJapan$471M+132%+19%17%5.4×21.7%+21.3%
Unisound AI Technology 9678.HKHong Kong$470M-84%+40%-18%2.0×n/an/a
Japan Business Systems 5036.TJapan$477M+16%+25%4%0.5×n/an/a
Equasens EQS.PAFrance$468M-25%+9%21%1.7×-6.4%+6.6%
AMTD Digital, Inc. Sponsored ADR HKDUnited States$468M-15%+22%27%23.9×48.8%+18.5%
Koal Software 603232.SSChina$479M-26%-18%-33%7.7×n/an/a
Craneware CRW.LUnited Kingdom$467M-32%-3%14%2.2×2.9%+22.2%
Gravity Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR GRVYUnited States$467M+3%-2%16%0.1×n/an/a
Beijing ABT Networks 688168.SSChina$485M-52%-73%-33%13.0×n/an/a
Kaiser (China) Culture 002425.SZChina$461M-10%-3%-53%5.8×n/an/a
BOKU BOKU.LUnited Kingdom$490M-29%+10%9%2.3×9.1%+17.3%
NEXON Games 225570.KSSouth Korea$457M-18%-31%-26%3.3×n/an/a
Datamatics Global Services DATAMATICS.NSIndia$453M-12%+11%16%1.9×10.8%+11.6%
innoscripta 1INN.DEGermany$495M-37%+42%61%3.5×-13.3%+55.9%
Nuix NXL.AXAustralia$452M+37%+19%12%2.4×23.0%+8.4%
CoinShares CSHRUnited States$498M-36%n/an/an/an/an/a
Dareway Intelligent Technology 688579.SSChina$450M-26%-21%-2%6.1×18.9%+0.9%

Questions

Which companies are China Post Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: GREE Holdings.Inc (3632.T), GB Group PLC (GBG.L), Tangel Culture (300148.SZ), Hennge K.k (4475.T), Unisound AI Technology (9678.HK), Japan Business Systems (5036.T), Equasens (EQS.PA), AMTD Digital, Inc. Sponsored ADR (HKD).
Is China Post Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.4× against a peer median of 2.8×, 3rd cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has China Post Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.2% against -21.2% for the median peer; over one year -41.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.