Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688168.SS Beijing ABT Networks Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing ABT Networks Co., Ltd. Class A688168.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$485M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$18.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
110.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-15.4 pp
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥29.93
1D-3.3%
1W+2.4%
1M-24.1%
3M-3.5%
6M-51.7%
YTD-44.2%
1Y-45.5%
ATR %9.6%
52w lowhigh61.9% off high

What Beijing ABT Networks does

Employees: 241

Beijing ABT Networks at a glance

Size Beijing ABT Networks (688168.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $485M, the 3924th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥29.93 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 51.7%, against -26.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 73.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.0%); the operating margin is -32.6% (peer median 7.8%).

Valuation It trades at 110.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.1× (most expensive of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.4 points below its cost of capital (9.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 72688168.SS 48
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing ABT Networks against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing ABT Networks financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥258MCN¥554MCN¥731MCN¥545MCN¥453M
Revenue growth—-24%+34%+20%—
Gross profitCN¥107MCN¥391MCN¥445MCN¥312MCN¥232M
EBITDA-CN¥35.0M-CN¥139M-CN¥96.1MCN¥52.4MCN¥6.89M
Net income-CN¥67.6M-CN¥154M-CN¥119MCN¥11.8M-CN¥8.46M
Free cash flow-CN¥18.0M-CN¥245MCN¥61.8M-CN¥189M-CN¥400M
Capital expenditureCN¥12.2MCN¥21.3MCN¥95.4MCN¥66.9MCN¥240M
Total debtCN¥296MCN¥248MCN¥292MCN¥213MCN¥176M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing ABT Networks competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%BOKU603232503636321INN688648CSHRGBG30014830066344759678300830IIIVEQSHKDNEXNGRVY688168.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing ABT Networks is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×50×100×BOKU603232503636321INNGBG44759678IIIVEQS688168.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing ABT Networks is the large dot.

Beijing ABT Networks competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing ABT Networks compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing ABT Networks against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688168.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-24.1%-2.3%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-51.7%-26.1%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-61.9%-45.6%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-73.3%+3.0%lowest of 20
Operating margin-32.6%7.8%3rd lowest of 20
Forward P/E110.8×16.1×most expensive of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-15.4 pp-7.1 pp5th lowest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Beijing ABT Networks 688168.SSChina$485M-52%-73%-33%110.8×n/an/a
BOKU BOKU.LUnited Kingdom$490M-29%+10%9%19.3×9.1%+17.3%
Koal Software 603232.SSChina$479M-26%-18%-33%68.7×n/an/a
Japan Business Systems 5036.TJapan$477M+16%+25%4%10.6×n/an/a
GREE Holdings.Inc 3632.TJapan$475M+20%-10%8%24.5×n/an/a
innoscripta 1INN.DEGermany$495M-37%+42%61%8.0×-13.3%+55.9%
China Post Technology 688648.SSChina$474M-33%+52%-7%n/an/an/a
CoinShares CSHRUnited States$498M-36%n/an/a7.1×n/an/a
GB Group PLC GBG.LUnited Kingdom$472M-29%+1%11%8.7×4.6%+5.5%
Shanghai Wisdom Information Technology 301315.SZChina$499M-26%-15%4%n/an/an/a
Tangel Culture 300148.SZChina$472M-8%+9%9%n/a25.6%-7.4%
Client Service International 300663.SZChina$499M-45%-29%-85%n/a30.0%-10.7%
Hennge K.k 4475.TJapan$471M+132%+19%17%40.3×21.7%+21.3%
Unisound AI Technology 9678.HKHong Kong$470M-84%+40%-18%24.0×n/an/a
JinXianDai Information Industry 300830.SZChina$502M-29%-20%-42%n/a17.7%-8.8%
i3 Verticals IIIVUnited States$502M-10%-8%3%16.1×31.2%+7.3%
Equasens EQS.PAFrance$468M-25%+9%21%9.4×-6.4%+6.6%
AMTD Digital, Inc. Sponsored ADR HKDUnited States$468M-15%+22%27%n/a48.8%+18.5%
Craneware CRW.LUnited Kingdom$467M-32%-3%14%17.2×2.9%+22.2%
Nexxen International NEXNUnited States$503M+15%+3%5%7.6×6.3%+11.5%
Gravity Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR GRVYUnited States$467M+3%-2%16%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Beijing ABT Networks's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: BOKU (BOKU.L), Koal Software (603232.SS), Japan Business Systems (5036.T), GREE Holdings.Inc (3632.T), innoscripta (1INN.DE), China Post Technology (688648.SS), CoinShares (CSHR), GB Group PLC (GBG.L).
Is Beijing ABT Networks expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 110.8× against a peer median of 16.1×, most expensive of 14 in its peer set.
How has Beijing ABT Networks stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -51.7% against -26.1% for the median peer; over one year -45.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.