Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688489.SS Sansec Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sansec Technology Co. Ltd. Class A688489.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum strong 73
Mkt cap
$590M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
24%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
112.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-11.6 pp
WACC 12.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
151 days
6 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥23.51
1D-4.3%
1W+4.4%
1M-10.9%
3M+6.1%
6M-13.0%
YTD-23.9%
1Y-34.5%
ATR %7.7%
52w lowhigh36.4% off high

What Sansec Technology does

Employees: 817

Sansec Technology at a glance

Size Sansec Technology (688489.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $590M, the 3462nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥23.51 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.0%, against -16.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 18.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.9%); the operating margin is -6.9% (peer median -5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 112.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.5× (most expensive of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.6 points below its cost of capital (12.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 6 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026688489.SS 85Peer median 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Sansec Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sansec Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥606MCN¥549MCN¥469MCN¥356MCN¥338M
Revenue growth—+17%+32%+5%—
Gross profitCN¥451MCN¥338MCN¥301MCN¥246MCN¥246M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥16.0MCN¥25.0MCN¥41.8MCN¥104M
Net incomeCN¥1.04M-CN¥43.6MCN¥42.1MCN¥67.3MCN¥107M
Free cash flowCN¥60.3MCN¥45.3M-CN¥78.3MCN¥192,850-CN¥25.9M
Capital expenditureCN¥26.7MCN¥67.1MCN¥108MCN¥88.4MCN¥19.9M
Total debtCN¥54.0MCN¥6.34MCN¥23.6MCN¥40.8MCN¥1.90M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sansec Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+200%+400%+600%-50%0%+50%0029126002124456800021483005186880390068RCATHQ278A603258688489.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sansec Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%50×100×002912600212CGNT39936687278A603258RAY-B688489.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sansec Technology is the large dot.

Sansec Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Sansec Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sansec Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688489.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.9%-8.7%9th lowest of 20
6-month return-13.0%-16.5%10th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-36.4%-42.4%9th highest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+18.4%+13.9%10th highest of 20
Operating margin-6.9%-5.9%10th lowest of 20
Forward P/E112.0×16.5×most expensive of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.6 pp-18.2 pp8th highest of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sansec Technology 688489.SSChina$590M-13%+18%-7%112.0×n/an/a
Shenzhen Sinovatio Technology 002912.SZChina$592M-2%+7%-10%24.7×n/an/a
UISEE Technologies (Beijing) 1511.HKHong Kong$593Mn/a+24%-71%n/an/an/a
Gresgying Digital Energy Technology 600212.SSChina$594M-34%-8%-6%12.5×23.5%+38.2%
Cognyte Software CGNTUnited States$597M-27%+28%5%12.7×22.2%-2.0%
Curiox Biosystems 445680.KSSouth Korea$577M-55%+37%-245%n/an/an/a
PKSHA Technology 3993.TJapan$602M-8%+74%16%28.2×16.6%+24.1%
JST 6687.HKHong Kong$603M-28%+26%11%14.5×-11.9%+30.3%
Beijing Bewinner Communications 002148.SZChina$573M-25%+5%-3%n/an/an/a
Elice 0158S0.KSSouth Korea$572Mn/a+14%14%n/an/an/a
Sophia Genetics SOPHUnited States$608M+39%+24%-80%n/an/an/a
Guangxi Xinxunda Technology 300518.SZChina$571M-20%-35%-105%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology 688039.SSChina$609M-13%+1%-48%n/an/an/a
TXT e-solutions TXT.MIItaly$610M+29%+22%6%16.5×10.3%+41.8%
Manycore Tech 0068.HKHong Kong$567M-90%+9%0%n/an/an/a
Red Cat RCATUnited States$617M-61%+693%-150%n/an/an/a
Horizon Quantum HQUnited States$617M+14%n/an/an/an/an/a
Beijing ZZNode Technologies 003007.SZChina$617M-23%+64%20%n/an/an/a
Terra Drone 278A.TJapan$618M+564%+14%-26%69.9×n/an/a
Hangzhou Electronic Soul Network Technology 603258.SSChina$562M-7%-9%-79%10.2×n/an/a
RaySearch Laboratories RAY-B.STSweden$618M+1%+3%19%27.7×7.3%+15.6%

Questions

Which companies are Sansec Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shenzhen Sinovatio Technology (002912.SZ), UISEE Technologies (Beijing) (1511.HK), Gresgying Digital Energy Technology (600212.SS), Cognyte Software (CGNT), Curiox Biosystems (445680.KS), PKSHA Technology (3993.T), JST (6687.HK), Beijing Bewinner Communications (002148.SZ).
Is Sansec Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 112.0× against a peer median of 16.5×, most expensive of 10 in its peer set.
How has Sansec Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.0% against -16.5% for the median peer; over one year -34.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.