Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 003007.SZ Beijing ZZNode Technologies Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing ZZNode Technologies Co., Ltd. Class A003007.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum neutral 50
Mkt cap
$617M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$12.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+6.3 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥34.43
1D-3.8%
1W+1.1%
1M-11.2%
3M-2.7%
6M-23.0%
YTD-7.7%
1Y+0.4%
ATR %6.0%
52w lowhigh42.4% off high

What Beijing ZZNode Technologies does

Employees: 730

Beijing ZZNode Technologies at a glance

Size Beijing ZZNode Technologies (003007.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $617M, the 3355th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥34.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.0%, against -12.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 63.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.4%); the operating margin is 19.6% (peer median -4.9%).

Valuation It trades at 6.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.3× (7th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.3 points above its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 85003007.SZ 70
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing ZZNode Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing ZZNode Technologies financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥677MCN¥424MCN¥416MCN¥433MCN¥489M
Revenue growth—+2%-4%-11%—
Gross profitCN¥492MCN¥235MCN¥253MCN¥260MCN¥255M
EBITDAn/aCN¥133MCN¥60.2MCN¥58.3MCN¥41.2M
Net incomeCN¥69.0MCN¥17.7MCN¥33.0MCN¥77.9MCN¥38.6M
Free cash flow-CN¥535M-CN¥1.06B-CN¥12.2MCN¥7.69M-CN¥14.9M
Capital expenditureCN¥428MCN¥1.05BCN¥33.6MCN¥14.5MCN¥22.1M
Total debtCN¥1.35BCN¥1.22BCN¥23.4MCN¥5.70MCN¥6.36M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing ZZNode Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+200%+400%+600%-25%0%+25%+50%HQ278ARCATRAY-B301556300299688039SOPH3993301213600212003007.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing ZZNode Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%+600%0×10×20×278ARCATRAY-B301556300299TXT688039SOPH300380668739933012131511688023003007.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing ZZNode Technologies is the large dot.

Beijing ZZNode Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing ZZNode Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing ZZNode Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure003007.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.2%-6.2%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-23.0%-12.9%9th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-42.4%-39.7%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+63.7%+18.4%3rd highest of 20
Operating margin19.6%-4.9%highest of 20
EV / Sales6.8×4.3×7th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.3 pp-10.2 pp2nd highest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing ZZNode Technologies 003007.SZChina$617M-23%+64%20%6.8×n/an/a
Horizon Quantum HQUnited States$617M+14%n/an/an/an/an/a
Terra Drone 278A.TJapan$618M+564%+14%-26%17.8×n/an/a
Red Cat RCATUnited States$617M-61%+693%-150%4.3×n/an/a
RaySearch Laboratories RAY-B.STSweden$618M+1%+3%19%4.7×7.3%+15.6%
Zhejiang TOP Cloud-agri Technology 301556.SZChina$620M-34%-14%13%7.7×30.7%+14.0%
Fuchun Technology 300299.SZChina$623M-2%+3%2%10.8×54.9%-4.8%
TXT e-solutions TXT.MIItaly$610M+29%+22%6%1.5×10.3%+41.8%
Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology 688039.SSChina$609M-13%+1%-48%12.5×n/an/a
Sophia Genetics SOPHUnited States$608M+39%+24%-80%6.3×n/an/a
Shanghai Amarsoft Information & Technology 300380.SZChina$628M-30%-2%4%3.8×n/an/a
JST 6687.HKHong Kong$603M-28%+26%11%1.1×-11.9%+30.3%
PKSHA Technology 3993.TJapan$602M-8%+74%16%2.5×16.6%+24.1%
Sichuan Discovery Dream Science & Technology 301213.SZChina$633M-26%+34%2%19.9×n/an/a
Cognyte Software CGNTUnited States$597M-27%+28%5%1.3×22.2%-2.0%
Mingchen Health 002919.SZChina$640M-33%+19%-5%2.4×27.2%+17.5%
Gresgying Digital Energy Technology 600212.SSChina$594M-34%-8%-6%3.3×23.5%+38.2%
UISEE Technologies (Beijing) 1511.HKHong Kong$593Mn/a+24%-71%11.2×n/an/a
Shenzhen Sinovatio Technology 002912.SZChina$592M-2%+7%-10%4.1×n/an/a
DBAPPSecurity 688023.SSChina$646M-6%+2%-5%1.8×5.6%+10.3%
Sansec Technology 688489.SSChina$590M-13%+18%-7%5.5×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Beijing ZZNode Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Horizon Quantum (HQ), Terra Drone (278A.T), Red Cat (RCAT), RaySearch Laboratories (RAY-B.ST), Zhejiang TOP Cloud-agri Technology (301556.SZ), Fuchun Technology (300299.SZ), TXT e-solutions (TXT.MI), Hangzhou Arcvideo Technology (688039.SS).
Is Beijing ZZNode Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 6.8× against a peer median of 4.3×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Beijing ZZNode Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.0% against -12.9% for the median peer; over one year +0.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.