Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002148.SZ Beijing Bewinner Communications Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing Bewinner Communications Co., Ltd. Class A002148.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$573M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-9.2 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥5.88
1D-2.3%
1W+6.3%
1M-3.8%
3M-7.4%
6M-25.5%
YTD-33.9%
1Y-38.6%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh40.2% off high

What Beijing Bewinner Communications does

Employees: 211

Beijing Bewinner Communications at a glance

Size Beijing Bewinner Communications (002148.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $573M, the 3532nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥5.88 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 25.5%, against -21.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.3%); the operating margin is -2.7% (peer median -6.4%).

Valuation It trades at 9.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.6× (5th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.2 points below its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Relative performance

70809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77002148.SZ 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing Bewinner Communications against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing Bewinner Communications financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥384MCN¥381MCN¥281MCN¥265MCN¥233M
Revenue growth—+36%+6%+13%—
Gross profitCN¥154MCN¥151MCN¥106MCN¥107MCN¥98.3M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥6.57MCN¥20.8MCN¥31.2MCN¥29.6M
Net incomeCN¥575,477-CN¥5.61MCN¥26.2MCN¥22.9MCN¥17.0M
Free cash flowCN¥234,750-CN¥9.60MCN¥328,750CN¥50.1MCN¥64.6M
Capital expenditureCN¥624,653CN¥1.12MCN¥9.75MCN¥484,725CN¥1.03M
Total debtCN¥696,037CN¥10.6MCN¥15.7MCN¥4.64MCN¥9.37M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing Bewinner Communications competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-100%-50%0%-50%-25%0%3005184456800068603258QDT603869688489002912ATOSTYL600212RZLVCGNT688588SOPH002148.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing Bewinner Communications is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+1,000%+2,000%0×50×100×3005184456800068603258QDTGNS1511RZLV002148.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing Bewinner Communications is the large dot.

Beijing Bewinner Communications competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing Bewinner Communications compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing Bewinner Communications against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002148.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.8%-10.2%6th highest of 20
6-month return-25.5%-21.4%9th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-40.2%-36.4%10th lowest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.2%+11.3%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin-2.7%-6.4%10th highest of 21
EV / Sales9.1×3.6×5th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.2 pp-11.6 pp8th highest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing Bewinner Communications 002148.SZChina$573M-25%+5%-3%9.1×n/an/a
Elice 0158S0.KSSouth Korea$572Mn/a+14%14%n/an/an/a
Guangxi Xinxunda Technology 300518.SZChina$571M-20%-35%-105%31.5×n/an/a
Curiox Biosystems 445680.KSSouth Korea$577M-55%+37%-245%134.2×n/an/a
Manycore Tech 0068.HKHong Kong$567M-90%+9%0%3.0×n/an/a
Hangzhou Electronic Soul Network Technology 603258.SSChina$562M-7%-9%-79%6.9×n/an/a
Quadient QDT.PAFrance$560M+24%-10%12%1.2×-2.4%+0.1%
ENC Digital Technology 603869.SSChina$559M-26%-10%-8%4.1×n/an/a
Sansec Technology 688489.SSChina$590M-13%+18%-7%5.5×n/an/a
Niewiadow Polish Military Group Joint Stock GNS.WAPoland$557M-22%+490%-73%23.7×n/an/a
Shenzhen Sinovatio Technology 002912.SZChina$592M-2%+7%-10%4.1×n/an/a
Atos ATO.PAFrance$555M-35%-14%6%0.3×n/an/a
UISEE Technologies (Beijing) 1511.HKHong Kong$593Mn/a+24%-71%11.2×n/an/a
Seshaasai Technologies STYL.NSIndia$554M+20%-2%23%3.2×12.2%+7.9%
Gresgying Digital Energy Technology 600212.SSChina$594M-34%-8%-6%3.3×23.5%+38.2%
Rezolve AI RZLVUnited States$550M-45%+2,224%-94%3.6×n/an/a
Cognyte Software CGNTUnited States$597M-27%+28%5%1.3×22.2%-2.0%
PKSHA Technology 3993.TJapan$602M-8%+74%16%2.5×16.6%+24.1%
JST 6687.HKHong Kong$603M-28%+26%11%1.1×-11.9%+30.3%
Linkage Software 688588.SSChina$541M-21%-10%12%3.2×17.6%+10.8%
Sophia Genetics SOPHUnited States$608M+39%+24%-80%6.3×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Beijing Bewinner Communications's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Elice (0158S0.KS), Guangxi Xinxunda Technology (300518.SZ), Curiox Biosystems (445680.KS), Manycore Tech (0068.HK), Hangzhou Electronic Soul Network Technology (603258.SS), Quadient (QDT.PA), ENC Digital Technology (603869.SS), Sansec Technology (688489.SS).
Is Beijing Bewinner Communications expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 9.1× against a peer median of 3.6×, 5th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Beijing Bewinner Communications stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -25.5% against -21.4% for the median peer; over one year -38.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.