Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300518.SZ Guangxi Xinxunda Technology Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guangxi Xinxunda Technology Group Co., Ltd. Class A300518.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$571M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
87%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-22.2 pp
WACC 9.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥19.94
1D-3.1%
1W+1.2%
1M-21.5%
3M+14.9%
6M-20.0%
YTD+13.9%
1Y+47.5%
ATR %8.6%
52w lowhigh50.1% off high

What Guangxi Xinxunda Technology does

Employees: 131

Guangxi Xinxunda Technology at a glance

Size Guangxi Xinxunda Technology (300518.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $571M, the 3540th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥19.94 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 20.0%, against -23.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 35.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.3%); the operating margin is -104.7% (peer median -4.3%).

Valuation It trades at 31.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.6× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 22.2 points below its cost of capital (9.8% WACC).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 76300518.SZ 76
Six months, rebased to 100: Guangxi Xinxunda Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guangxi Xinxunda Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥121MCN¥128MCN¥160MCN¥247MCN¥511M
Revenue growth—-20%-35%-52%—
Gross profitCN¥21.9MCN¥13.8MCN¥11.6MCN¥113MCN¥408M
EBITDA-CN¥120M-CN¥64.4M-CN¥151MCN¥11.3MCN¥257M
Net income-CN¥148M-CN¥105M-CN¥316M-CN¥255MCN¥57.7M
Free cash flow-CN¥89.1M-CN¥94.1M-CN¥206M-CN¥111MCN¥223M
Capital expenditureCN¥19.7MCN¥15.3MCN¥80.9MCN¥59.7MCN¥11.4M
Total debtCN¥13.8MCN¥8.28MCN¥27.1MCN¥86.8MCN¥73.6M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guangxi Xinxunda Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-100%-50%0%-50%-25%0%0021480068445680603258QDT603869GNSATOSTYL002912RZLV600212CGNT688588SOPH300518.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guangxi Xinxunda Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+1,000%+2,000%0×50×100×0021480068445680603258QDTGNSRZLV300518.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guangxi Xinxunda Technology is the large dot.

Guangxi Xinxunda Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Guangxi Xinxunda Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guangxi Xinxunda Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300518.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-21.5%-8.7%5th lowest of 20
6-month return-20.0%-23.5%8th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-50.1%-36.4%8th lowest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)-35.0%+11.3%lowest of 21
Operating margin-104.7%-4.3%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales31.5×3.6×2nd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-22.2 pp-9.8 pp7th lowest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Guangxi Xinxunda Technology 300518.SZChina$571M-20%-35%-105%31.5×n/an/a
Elice 0158S0.KSSouth Korea$572Mn/a+14%14%n/an/an/a
Beijing Bewinner Communications 002148.SZChina$573M-25%+5%-3%9.1×n/an/a
Manycore Tech 0068.HKHong Kong$567M-90%+9%0%3.0×n/an/a
Curiox Biosystems 445680.KSSouth Korea$577M-55%+37%-245%134.2×n/an/a
Hangzhou Electronic Soul Network Technology 603258.SSChina$562M-7%-9%-79%6.9×n/an/a
Quadient QDT.PAFrance$560M+24%-10%12%1.2×-2.4%+0.1%
ENC Digital Technology 603869.SSChina$559M-26%-10%-8%4.1×n/an/a
Niewiadow Polish Military Group Joint Stock GNS.WAPoland$557M-22%+490%-73%23.7×n/an/a
Atos ATO.PAFrance$555M-35%-14%6%0.3×n/an/a
Seshaasai Technologies STYL.NSIndia$554M+20%-2%23%3.2×12.2%+7.9%
Sansec Technology 688489.SSChina$590M-13%+18%-7%5.5×n/an/a
Shenzhen Sinovatio Technology 002912.SZChina$592M-2%+7%-10%4.1×n/an/a
Rezolve AI RZLVUnited States$550M-45%+2,224%-94%3.6×n/an/a
UISEE Technologies (Beijing) 1511.HKHong Kong$593Mn/a+24%-71%11.2×n/an/a
Gresgying Digital Energy Technology 600212.SSChina$594M-34%-8%-6%3.3×23.5%+38.2%
Cognyte Software CGNTUnited States$597M-27%+28%5%1.3×22.2%-2.0%
PKSHA Technology 3993.TJapan$602M-8%+74%16%2.5×16.6%+24.1%
JST 6687.HKHong Kong$603M-28%+26%11%1.1×-11.9%+30.3%
Linkage Software 688588.SSChina$541M-21%-10%12%3.2×17.6%+10.8%
Sophia Genetics SOPHUnited States$608M+39%+24%-80%6.3×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Guangxi Xinxunda Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Elice (0158S0.KS), Beijing Bewinner Communications (002148.SZ), Manycore Tech (0068.HK), Curiox Biosystems (445680.KS), Hangzhou Electronic Soul Network Technology (603258.SS), Quadient (QDT.PA), ENC Digital Technology (603869.SS), Niewiadow Polish Military Group Joint Stock (GNS.WA).
Is Guangxi Xinxunda Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 31.5× against a peer median of 3.6×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Guangxi Xinxunda Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -20.0% against -23.5% for the median peer; over one year +47.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.