Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 641A.T NOK Group CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

NOK Group Corporation641A.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Auto Parts: OEM
Mkt cap
$3.11B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$10.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-1.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥2,604
1D-5.5%
1W-6.5%
1M-8.8%
3Mn/a
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh16.5% off high

What NOK does

Employees: 36,655

NOK at a glance

Size NOK (641A.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $3.11B, the 356th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,604 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue fell 0.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.9%); the operating margin is 4.5% (peer median 10.3%).

Valuation It trades at 0.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.4× (4th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.4 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

NOK financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥748B¥738B¥767B¥751B¥710B
Revenue growth—-4%+2%+6%—
Gross profit¥134B¥131B¥136B¥116B¥106B
EBITDA¥83.9B¥82.7B¥84.8B¥71.0B¥61.4B
Net income¥49.7B¥46.3B¥30.3B¥31.6B¥13.3B
Free cash flown/a¥19.6B¥43.8B¥43.4B¥1.25B
Capital expendituren/a¥49.8B¥48.8B¥46.3B¥45.4B
Total debt¥66.2B¥65.0B¥64.4B¥78.4B¥74.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

NOK competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%1×2×3×4×53441969195977295947626931329072801219634626613465921951970690086370626890656481641A.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. NOK is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%19691959772959476269907246261951970662686481641A.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. NOK is the large dot.

NOK competitors and peer comparison

How NOK compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

NOK against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure641A.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.8%-13.4%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.5%-36.5%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.4%+7.9%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin4.5%10.3%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales0.6×1.4×4th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.3%3.8%6th least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.4%+8.1%6th lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.7 pp-4.5 pp8th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.4 pp+2.0 pp2nd lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA5.5×8.5×3rd cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×0.2×8th least indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
NOK 641A.TJapan$3.11Bn/a0%4%0.6×-0.3%+4.4%
Maruwa 5344.TJapan$3.12B-46%+26%36%4.8×n/an/a
Takasago Thermal Engineering 1969.TJapan$3.13B-21%+2%11%1.2×3.8%+9.0%
Kraftia 1959.TJapan$3.10B-29%+5%12%1.0×2.8%+4.0%
Tokyo Seimitsu 7729.TJapan$3.16B-29%+17%22%2.4×16.0%+11.4%
Rinnai 5947.TJapan$3.07B-3%+4%10%0.8×-9.5%+6.4%
Modec 6269.TJapan$3.03B-46%+17%9%0.3×-21.3%+18.6%
Macnica 3132.TJapan$3.23B+8%+35%4%0.4×n/an/a
NIKKON 9072.TJapan$3.25B-19%+7%9%2.2×12.0%+8.1%
Nagase & 8012.TJapan$2.96B-9%+8%5%0.6×3.5%+3.2%
Jgc 1963.TJapan$2.94B-18%-15%6%0.1×n/an/a
Taiyo 4626.TJapan$3.36B-5%+18%25%3.7×5.0%+11.2%
Fuji 6134.TJapan$2.85B-23%+45%20%1.9×n/an/a
Mabuchi Motor 6592.TJapan$2.84B+18%+12%12%1.6×5.8%+11.5%
EXEO 1951.TJapan$2.84B-22%+18%7%0.6×-5.0%+6.6%
Japan Airport Terminal 9706.TJapan$3.46B+16%+8%17%2.3×-2.3%+40.7%
Keio 9008.TJapan$2.80B+3%+10%10%1.8×n/an/a
Kurita Water Industries 6370.TJapan$3.47B-39%+1%14%1.5×5.6%+8.5%
Nabtesco 6268.TJapan$2.77B-28%-8%9%1.3×7.8%+2.0%
Sankyu 9065.TJapan$2.76B-9%0%7%0.8×-1.1%+3.4%
THK 6481.TJapan$3.52B-16%+8%7%2.4×24.8%+1.9%

Questions

Which companies are NOK's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Maruwa (5344.T), Takasago Thermal Engineering (1969.T), Kraftia (1959.T), Tokyo Seimitsu (7729.T), Rinnai (5947.T), Modec (6269.T), Macnica (3132.T), NIKKON (9072.T).
Is NOK expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.6× against a peer median of 1.4×, 4th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.