Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9072.T NIKKON Holdings Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

NIKKON Holdings Co., Ltd.9072.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Trucking

Japanese third-party logistics provider offering trucking, warehousing and supply-chain management for manufacturers and retailers.

≈ A Japanese contract-logistics/3PL operator, akin to a regional XPO LogisticsMomentum laggard 15
Mkt cap
$3.25B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
73%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.54M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
26.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.9 pp
WACC 5.7%
Hurdle
+4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥4,134
1D-3.6%
1W-0.3%
1M-12.9%
3M-17.9%
6M-18.7%
YTD+21.4%
1Y+17.9%
ATR %3.7%
52w lowhigh38.2% off high

What NIKKON does

Japanese third-party logistics provider offering trucking, warehousing and supply-chain management for manufacturers and retailers.

Paid for moving and storing goods on contracts that bundle trucking, warehousing and handling for a manufacturer or retailer, so volumes follow its clients' output and shipments. Margins are set largely by how full its trucks and warehouses are and by driver and fuel costs.

In one line: A Japanese contract-logistics/3PL operator, akin to a regional XPO Logistics.

Products and services

  • General freight trucking
  • Warehousing/distribution centers
  • Supply-chain management services

Customers

  • Manufacturers and retailers outsourcing logistics

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Logistics/trucking
  • Third-party logistics (3PL)

What could go right

  • E-commerce driven logistics demand

What could go wrong

  • Driver shortage/wage inflation
  • Thin trucking margins

Moat: none (scale, distribution). Nationwide trucking/warehouse network provides scale, but logistics is a competitive, low-differentiation business.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Employees: 13,746

Named competitors

NIKKON at a glance

Size NIKKON (9072.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Trucking) with a market value of $3.25B, the 338th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,134 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.7%, against -8.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.7%); the operating margin is 8.7% (peer median 5.0%).

Valuation It trades at 26.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.6× (2nd most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points below its cost of capital (5.7% WACC).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 949072.T 84
Six months, rebased to 100: NIKKON against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

NIKKON financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥273B¥270B¥248B¥222B¥212B
Revenue growth—+9%+11%+5%—
Gross profit¥42.1B¥40.5B¥37.4B¥32.2B¥30.0B
EBITDA¥42.5B¥42.5B¥38.6B¥33.7B¥31.9B
Net income¥16.1B¥17.5B¥16.6B¥16.6B¥15.9B
Free cash flown/a¥11.3B¥954M¥7.59B¥10.3B
Capital expendituren/a¥28.2B¥27.5B¥24.0B¥22.7B
Total debt¥131B¥136B¥119B¥79.2B¥73.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

NIKKON competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%-20%-10%0%+10%603162ARCB9076LSTRSNDRMTLSTFWERNSAIAKNXNTGMRTNTGHN90689072.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. NIKKON is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%10×15×20×25×603162ARCB9076LSTRSNDRMTLSTFWERNTFIISAIAKNXNTGMRTNTGHN90689072.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. NIKKON is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%603162ARCB9076LSTRSNDRMTLSTFTFIISAIANTGTGHN90689072.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. NIKKON is the large dot.

NIKKON competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9072.T vs 9076.T vs 9064.T vs 9147.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
NIKKON 9072.T$3.25B-19%+7%9%26.9×12.0%
Seino 9076.T$2.48B+9%+7%5%14.5×-3.2%
Yamato 9064.T$4.83B+26%+2%2%34.5×8.9%
Nippon Express Hldgs 9147.T$8.22B+35%+2%3%17.6×7.9%

How NIKKON compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

NIKKON against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9072.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.9%-2.7%5th lowest of 16
6-month return-18.7%-8.8%6th lowest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-38.2%-29.2%4th lowest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.6%+7.7%6th lowest of 16
Operating margin8.7%5.0%5th highest of 16
Forward P/E26.9×15.6×2nd most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)12.0%7.1%5th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.1%+9.8%7th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.9 pp-5.2 pp6th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.9 pp-1.2 pp8th highest of 16
EV / EBITDA14.2×8.1×most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.1×0.4×6th most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
NIKKON 9072.TJapan$3.25B-19%+7%9%26.9×12.0%+8.1%
Fujian Highton Development 603162.SSChina$3.60B+3%+72%17%11.4×3.8%+45.6%
ArcBest ARCBUnited States$2.86B+6%+8%3%13.6×16.5%+6.4%
Seino 9076.TJapan$2.48B+9%+7%5%14.5×-3.2%+6.5%
Landstar System LSTRUnited States$4.83B-22%+11%4%19.8×12.0%+2.8%
Schneider National SNDRUnited States$4.88B-10%+6%3%18.7×19.5%+4.5%
Mullen MTL.TOCanada$1.98B+36%+12%9%18.2×6.5%+12.9%
STEF STF.PAFrance$1.79B+12%+8%4%11.0×7.1%+10.2%
Werner Enterprises WERNUnited States$1.62B-26%+15%2%18.8×n/an/a
TFI International TFII.TOCanada$7.86B-29%+3%7%14.2×11.6%+16.8%
Saia SAIAUnited States$8.86B-26%+9%11%24.0×27.4%+12.2%
Knight-Swift Transportation KNXUnited States$9.51B-9%+7%4%15.6×21.3%+9.8%
NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S NTG.CODenmark$1.09B+71%+16%5%20.6×-0.4%+16.4%
Marten Transport MRTNUnited States$959M-25%-5%1%27.1×n/an/a
Logwin TGHN.DEGermany$942M+5%-6%5%15.2×-16.0%+3.9%
Maruzen Showa Unyu 9068.TJapan$922M-15%+3%10%10.5×-7.4%+4.2%

Questions

Who are NIKKON's main competitors?
Named competitors: Seino Holdings (9076.T), Yamato Holdings (9064.T), Nippon Express Holdings (9147.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Fujian Highton Development (603162.SS), ArcBest (ARCB), Seino (9076.T), Landstar System (LSTR), Schneider National (SNDR), Mullen (MTL.TO).
Is NIKKON expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 26.9× against a peer median of 15.6×, 2nd most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has NIKKON stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.7% against -8.8% for the median peer; over one year +17.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.