Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MRTN Marten Transport, Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Marten Transport, Ltd.MRTNCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Trucking

Refrigerated and dry-van truckload carrier moving temperature-sensitive freight, with dedicated and brokerage units too.

Momentum weak 23
Mkt cap
$959M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.86M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-9.2 pp
WACC 10.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
81 days
26 Jan 2027
Close · USD$11.74
1D-2.0%
1W+0.2%
1M-8.2%
3M-20.0%
6M-24.6%
YTD+3.2%
1Y+17.3%
ATR %3.5%
Beta0.80
52w lowhigh36.5% off high

What Marten Transport does

Refrigerated and dry-van truckload carrier moving temperature-sensitive freight, with dedicated and brokerage units too.

Is paid per mile or per load, with a fuel surcharge added when diesel rises, and handles some freight under contracts while the rest moves at spot rates, so results depend on the balance between truck capacity and freight demand. It has stayed mostly asset-based, owning its tractors and trailers.

Products and services

  • Refrigerated (temperature-controlled) truckload
  • Dry van truckload
  • Dedicated fleet services
  • Marten Transport Logistics (brokerage)

Customers

  • Food & beverage shippers
  • Grocery/retail distributors
  • CPG manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Freight transportation
  • Refrigerated truckload trucking
  • Dedicated fleets / brokerage

What could go right

  • Food/grocery freight demand growth
  • Dedicated contract wins

What could go wrong

  • Freight rate cyclicality
  • Driver shortage/wage inflation

Moat: none (scale). Refrigerated trucking is a competitive, cyclical commodity service despite Marten's newer, efficient fleet.

Headquarters: Mondovi, Wisconsin · Founded: 1946 · Employees: 3,502

Named competitors

Marten Transport at a glance

Size Marten Transport (MRTN) is a United States Industrials company (Trucking) with a market value of $959M, the 2276th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $11.74 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.6%, against -1.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.5%); the operating margin is 0.8% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 27.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.2× (4th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.2 points below its cost of capital (10.0% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 100MRTN 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Marten Transport against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Marten Transport financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$860M$884M$964M$1.13B$1.26B
Revenue growth—-8%-15%-10%—
Gross profit$43.1M$50.5M$67.3M$122M$177M
EBITDA$106M$116M$140M$193M$241M
Net income$13.3M$17.4M$26.9M$70.4M$110M
Free cash flown/a-$51.1M-$98.4M-$76.2M$42.9M
Capital expendituren/a$145M$233M$241M$177M
Total debt$82,000$453,000$578,000$517,000$710,000

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Marten Transport competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%-20%0%+20%TGHN9068NTG600676CVLG9039HTLD6036869304ULH600650TCI300867VRLLOG001317WERNFWRDSTF001228MTLMRTN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Marten Transport is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%0×50×100×150×TGHN9068NTGCVLG9039HTLD603686ULHTCIFWRDSTFMTLMRTNRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Marten Transport is the large dot.

Marten Transport competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MRTN vs KNX vs WERN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Marten Transport MRTN$959M-25%-5%1%27.1×n/a
Knight-Swift Transportation KNX$9.51B-9%+7%4%15.6×21.3%
Werner Enterprises WERN$1.62B-26%+15%2%18.8×n/a

How Marten Transport compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Marten Transport against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMRTNPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.2%-1.3%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-24.6%-1.5%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-36.5%-26.6%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.8%+3.5%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin0.8%5.1%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E27.1×15.2×4th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.2 pp-0.9 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.1×9.0×7th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA-0.9×2.2×3rd least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Marten Transport MRTNUnited States$959M-25%-5%1%27.1×n/an/a
Logwin TGHN.DEGermany$942M+5%-6%5%15.2×-16.0%+3.9%
Maruzen Showa Unyu 9068.TJapan$922M-15%+3%10%10.5×-7.4%+4.2%
NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S NTG.CODenmark$1.09B+71%+16%5%20.6×-0.4%+16.4%
Shanghai Juss Sports and Entertainment 600676.SSChina$802M-36%-14%-15%n/a5.1%-11.0%
Covenant Logistics CVLGUnited States$801M-5%+12%1%12.3×n/an/a
Sakai Moving Service 9039.TJapan$785M+2%+4%10%13.7×-11.2%+4.5%
Heartland Express HTLDUnited States$780M-24%-17%-6%28.2×n/an/a
Fulongma 603686.SSChina$743M-37%+6%6%27.8×2.4%-2.0%
Shibusawa Logistics 9304.TJapan$723M+48%+2%5%n/a16.9%+4.1%
Universal Logistics ULHUnited States$715M+108%-7%4%13.9×n/an/a
Shanghai Jin Jiang Online Network Service 600650.SSChina$705M-14%-19%-2%n/a5.6%-10.8%
Transport Corporation of India TCI.NSIndia$700M-12%+12%8%14.2×14.9%+11.9%
Shengyuan Environmental Protection 300867.SZChina$638M-24%+3%28%11.8×-4.1%+8.5%
VRL Logistics VRLLOG.NSIndia$624M+27%+11%14%16.1×6.2%+12.8%
San Yang Ma (Chongqing) Logistics 001317.SZChina$606M-11%-51%4%n/a35.8%+7.1%
Werner Enterprises WERNUnited States$1.62B-26%+15%2%18.8×n/an/a
Forward Air FWRDUnited States$562M+69%0%3%153.6×17.1%+14.5%
STEF STF.PAFrance$1.79B+12%+8%4%11.0×7.1%+10.2%
Yongtaiyun Chemical Logistics 001228.SZChina$481M+7%+31%5%n/an/an/a
Mullen MTL.TOCanada$1.98B+36%+12%9%18.2×6.5%+12.9%

Questions

Who are Marten Transport's main competitors?
Named competitors: Prime Inc. (private or unlisted), KLLM Transport Services (private or unlisted), C.R. England (private or unlisted), Knight-Swift Transportation (KNX), Werner Enterprises (WERN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Logwin (TGHN.DE), Maruzen Showa Unyu (9068.T), NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S (NTG.CO), Shanghai Juss Sports and Entertainment (600676.SS), Covenant Logistics (CVLG), Sakai Moving Service (9039.T).
Is Marten Transport expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.1× against a peer median of 15.2×, 4th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Marten Transport stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.6% against -1.5% for the median peer; over one year +17.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.