Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9304.T Shibusawa Logistics CorpOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shibusawa Logistics Corp9304.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Trucking
Momentum leader 85
Mkt cap
$723M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
39%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.95M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-3.4 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
+13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,873
1D-3.6%
1W-6.8%
1M-12.8%
3M+2.0%
6M+47.6%
YTD+46.9%
1Y+63.7%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh17.4% off high

What Shibusawa Logistics does

Employees: 1,320

Shibusawa Logistics at a glance

Size Shibusawa Logistics (9304.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Trucking) with a market value of $723M, the 885th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,873 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 47.6%, against -9.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.4%); the operating margin is 5.3% (peer median 4.2%).

Valuation It trades at 1.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.0× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.4 points below its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269304.T 148Peer median 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Shibusawa Logistics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shibusawa Logistics financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥80.6B¥79.7B¥78.6B¥73.4B¥78.5B
Revenue growth—+1%+7%-6%—
Gross profit¥8.87B¥8.52B¥8.70B¥8.11B¥8.53B
EBITDA¥7.32B¥7.12B¥7.52B¥7.06B¥7.81B
Net income¥7.51B¥6.33B¥4.91B¥3.73B¥3.76B
Free cash flow¥4.24B¥4.00B¥212M-¥680M¥5.51B
Capital expenditure¥2.19B¥2.13B¥6.51B¥6.64B¥1.31B
Total debt¥32.5B¥27.8B¥30.3B¥27.4B¥37.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shibusawa Logistics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%-20%0%+20%ULH600650603686TCIHTLD9039CVLG600676300867VRLLOG0013179068FWRDTGHN001228NTG3010689304.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shibusawa Logistics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%2×4×ULH600650603686TCIHTLD9039CVLG600676300867VRLLOG0013179068FWRDTGHNMRTN001228NTG936930106826089304.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shibusawa Logistics is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%600650603686TCI9039600676300867VRLLOG0013179068FWRDTGHNNTG30106826089304.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shibusawa Logistics is the large dot.

Shibusawa Logistics competitors and peer comparison

How Shibusawa Logistics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shibusawa Logistics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9304.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.8%-3.3%6th lowest of 21
6-month return+47.6%-9.9%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.4%-31.9%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.9%+3.4%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin5.3%4.2%9th highest of 21
EV / Sales1.7×1.0×6th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.9%3.7%3rd most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.1%+5.8%6th lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+12.8 pp-6.2 pp4th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.4 pp-0.3 pp7th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA18.3×8.9×most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.7×1.4×5th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shibusawa Logistics 9304.TJapan$723M+48%+2%5%1.7×16.9%+4.1%
Universal Logistics ULHUnited States$715M+108%-7%4%0.9×n/an/a
Shanghai Jin Jiang Online Network Service 600650.SSChina$705M-14%-19%-2%2.0×5.6%-10.8%
Fulongma 603686.SSChina$743M-37%+6%6%1.1×2.4%-2.0%
Transport Corporation of India TCI.NSIndia$700M-12%+12%8%1.3×14.9%+11.9%
Heartland Express HTLDUnited States$780M-24%-17%-6%1.2×n/an/a
Sakai Moving Service 9039.TJapan$785M+2%+4%10%0.8×-11.2%+4.5%
Covenant Logistics CVLGUnited States$801M-5%+12%1%0.8×n/an/a
Shanghai Juss Sports and Entertainment 600676.SSChina$802M-36%-14%-15%0.8×5.1%-11.0%
Shengyuan Environmental Protection 300867.SZChina$638M-24%+3%28%4.9×-4.1%+8.5%
VRL Logistics VRLLOG.NSIndia$624M+27%+11%14%2.0×6.2%+12.8%
San Yang Ma (Chongqing) Logistics 001317.SZChina$606M-11%-51%4%5.5×35.8%+7.1%
Maruzen Showa Unyu 9068.TJapan$922M-15%+3%10%0.9×-7.4%+4.2%
Forward Air FWRDUnited States$562M+69%0%3%1.0×17.1%+14.5%
Logwin TGHN.DEGermany$942M+5%-6%5%0.4×-16.0%+3.9%
Marten Transport MRTNUnited States$959M-25%-5%1%1.0×n/an/a
Yongtaiyun Chemical Logistics 001228.SZChina$481M+7%+31%5%0.9×n/an/a
NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S NTG.CODenmark$1.09B+71%+16%5%0.8×-0.4%+16.4%
K.R.S.Corporation 9369.TJapan$441M-9%+4%3%0.6×n/an/a
Hangzhou Dadi Haiyang Environmental Protection 301068.SZChina$409M-45%+25%3%2.0×16.2%+23.5%
Kerry TJ Logistics 2608.TWTaiwan$391M-8%-1%12%1.6×-5.0%+0.8%

Questions

Which companies are Shibusawa Logistics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Universal Logistics (ULH), Shanghai Jin Jiang Online Network Service (600650.SS), Fulongma (603686.SS), Transport Corporation of India (TCI.NS), Heartland Express (HTLD), Sakai Moving Service (9039.T), Covenant Logistics (CVLG), Shanghai Juss Sports and Entertainment (600676.SS).
Is Shibusawa Logistics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.7× against a peer median of 1.0×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +13 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Shibusawa Logistics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +47.6% against -9.9% for the median peer; over one year +63.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.