Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603162.SS Fujian Highton Development Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Fujian Highton Development Co., Ltd. Class A603162.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Trucking

Fujian-based dry-bulk shipping company operating coastal and international cargo vessels, not a trucking firm.

≈ A Chinese dry-bulk shipper, akin to a small Genco ShippingMomentum strong 67
Mkt cap
$3.60B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
27%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$49.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.2 pp
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
-42 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
133 days
19 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥10.38
1D-3.9%
1W-3.5%
1M-23.1%
3M-2.4%
6M+3.3%
YTD+27.6%
1Y+42.1%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh38.8% off high

What Fujian Highton Development does

Fujian-based dry-bulk shipping company operating coastal and international cargo vessels, not a trucking firm.

Earns freight on shipments of bulk cargo such as coal, ore and grain, either per voyage at spot rates or under longer contracts, with fuel and charter rates driving margin. Profits rise and fall with the shipping cycle.

In one line: A Chinese dry-bulk shipper, akin to a small Genco Shipping.

Products and services

  • Coastal dry-bulk shipping
  • International deep-sea shipping
  • Ship management/leasing

Customers

  • Commodity/cargo shippers (coal, ore, grain)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Marine transportation
  • Dry bulk shipping

What could go right

  • Dry-bulk freight rate upcycles

What could go wrong

  • Freight-rate cyclicality
  • Fuel cost swings

Moat: none (scale). Commodity dry-bulk shipping; earnings track freight-rate cycles, not a durable moat.

Headquarters: Fujian, China · Employees: 368

Named competitors

Fujian Highton Development at a glance

Size Fujian Highton Development (603162.SS) is a China Industrials company (Trucking) with a market value of $3.60B, the 714th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥10.38 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 3.3%, against -9.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 72.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 16.6% (peer median 5.0%).

Valuation It trades at 11.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.2× (3rd cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +46%, so the hurdle is -42 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.2 points above its cost of capital (6.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026603162.SS 94Peer median 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Fujian Highton Development against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

Fujian Highton Development financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥7.03BCN¥4.44BCN¥3.66BCN¥1.70BCN¥2.05B
Revenue growth—+21%+115%-17%—
Gross profitCN¥1.95BCN¥716MCN¥659MCN¥245MCN¥810M
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.26BCN¥1.06BCN¥322MCN¥744M
Net incomeCN¥1.03BCN¥465MCN¥549MCN¥185MCN¥671M
Free cash flowCN¥721MCN¥130M-CN¥951M-CN¥782MCN¥792M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.26BCN¥1.18BCN¥1.98BCN¥986MCN¥7.89M
Total debtCN¥2.53BCN¥1.77BCN¥1.41BCN¥697MCN¥428M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Fujian Highton Development competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%-20%-10%0%+10%9072ARCBLSTRSNDR9076MTLSTFTFIIWERNSAIAKNXNTGMRTNTGHN9068603162.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Fujian Highton Development is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%10×15×20×25×9072ARCBLSTRSNDR9076MTLSTFTFIIWERNSAIAKNXNTGMRTNTGHN9068603162.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Fujian Highton Development is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%9072ARCBLSTRSNDR9076MTLSTFTFIISAIANTGTGHN9068603162.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Fujian Highton Development is the large dot.

Fujian Highton Development competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (603162.SS vs 601919.SS vs SBLK vs GNK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Fujian Highton Development 603162.SS$3.60B+3%+72%17%11.4×3.8%
COSCO SHIPPING 601919.SS$39.0B+24%+6%16%6.9×-17.9%
Star Bulk Carriers SBLK$2.99B0%+6%28%5.7×-0.1%
Genco Shipping & Trading GNK$1.13B0%+26%17%10.2×n/a

How Fujian Highton Development compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Fujian Highton Development against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603162.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.1%-2.7%lowest of 16
6-month return+3.3%-9.6%7th highest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-38.8%-29.2%3rd lowest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+72.3%+7.1%highest of 16
Operating margin16.6%5.0%highest of 16
Forward P/E11.4×18.2×3rd cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)3.8%11.6%5th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+45.6%+8.1%highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-41.8 pp-3.2 ppleast demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.2 pp-1.2 pp3rd highest of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Fujian Highton Development 603162.SSChina$3.60B+3%+72%17%11.4×3.8%+45.6%
NIKKON 9072.TJapan$3.25B-19%+7%9%26.9×12.0%+8.1%
ArcBest ARCBUnited States$2.86B+6%+8%3%13.6×16.5%+6.4%
Landstar System LSTRUnited States$4.83B-22%+11%4%19.8×12.0%+2.8%
Schneider National SNDRUnited States$4.88B-10%+6%3%18.7×19.5%+4.5%
Seino 9076.TJapan$2.48B+9%+7%5%14.5×-3.2%+6.5%
Mullen MTL.TOCanada$1.98B+36%+12%9%18.2×6.5%+12.9%
STEF STF.PAFrance$1.79B+12%+8%4%11.0×7.1%+10.2%
TFI International TFII.TOCanada$7.86B-29%+3%7%14.2×11.6%+16.8%
Werner Enterprises WERNUnited States$1.62B-26%+15%2%18.8×n/an/a
Saia SAIAUnited States$8.86B-26%+9%11%24.0×27.4%+12.2%
Knight-Swift Transportation KNXUnited States$9.51B-9%+7%4%15.6×21.3%+9.8%
NTG Nordic Transport Group A/S NTG.CODenmark$1.09B+71%+16%5%20.6×-0.4%+16.4%
Marten Transport MRTNUnited States$959M-25%-5%1%27.1×n/an/a
Logwin TGHN.DEGermany$942M+5%-6%5%15.2×-16.0%+3.9%
Maruzen Showa Unyu 9068.TJapan$922M-15%+3%10%10.5×-7.4%+4.2%

Questions

Who are Fujian Highton Development's main competitors?
Named competitors: COSCO Shipping (601919.SS), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes NIKKON (9072.T), ArcBest (ARCB), Landstar System (LSTR), Schneider National (SNDR), Seino (9076.T), Mullen (MTL.TO).
Is Fujian Highton Development expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.4× against a peer median of 18.2×, 3rd cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +46%, so the hurdle is -42 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Fujian Highton Development stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +3.3% against -9.6% for the median peer; over one year +42.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.