Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6245.TWO Lanner Electronics Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Lanner Electronics Inc.6245.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Electronics Distributors
Momentum strong 65
Mkt cap
$344M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
86%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.39M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+14.5 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
10 days
16 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$78.20
1D-6.5%
1W-15.5%
1M-12.2%
3M0.0%
6M-5.0%
YTD+14.2%
1Y-3.3%
ATR %5.4%
52w lowhigh25.2% off high

What Lanner Electronics does

No business profile yet.

Lanner Electronics at a glance

Size Lanner Electronics (6245.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Electronics Distributors) with a market value of $344M, the 595th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$78.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.0%, against -9.5% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.3%); the operating margin is 9.3% (peer median 3.6%).

Valuation It trades at 1.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.4× (5th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.5 points above its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266245.TWO 95Peer median 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Lanner Electronics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lanner Electronics financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$7.34BNT$7.19BNT$7.45BNT$8.37BNT$9.82B
Revenue growth—-4%-11%-15%—
Gross profitNT$2.20BNT$2.20BNT$2.57BNT$2.73BNT$2.90B
EBITDANT$797MNT$751MNT$1.12BNT$1.31BNT$1.33B
Net incomeNT$642MNT$642MNT$891MNT$987MNT$1.00B
Free cash flow-NT$835MNT$788MNT$415MNT$2.20BNT$719M
Capital expenditureNT$48.7MNT$58.8MNT$88.1MNT$54.3MNT$146M
Total debtNT$117MNT$130MNT$131MNT$62.8MNT$1.06B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lanner Electronics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-30%-20%-10%0%3048813761890025476881597537PRT314705202008610374607609032190546A1184ABE80840012986245.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lanner Electronics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×20×40×304881376189002547688159314705202030280374607609546A3000506245.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lanner Electronics is the large dot.

Lanner Electronics competitors and peer comparison

How Lanner Electronics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lanner Electronics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6245.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%-14.8%7th highest of 21
6-month return-5.0%-9.5%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-25.2%-30.6%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.6%+18.3%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin9.3%3.6%highest of 21
EV / Sales1.1×0.4×5th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.5 pp+0.8 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA10.3×5.0×2nd most expensive of 4
Net debt / EBITDA-4.0×1.5×2nd least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Lanner Electronics 6245.TWOTaiwan$344M-5%-2%9%1.1×n/an/a
Edom Technology 3048.TWTaiwan$344M+6%+11%2%0.1×n/an/a
Sun-Wa Technos 8137.TJapan$346M+8%+20%3%0.3×-0.8%+1.9%
Promate Electronic 6189.TWTaiwan$354M-10%-10%4%0.4×-9.8%+2.1%
Suzhou Chunxing Precision Mechanical 002547.SZChina$332M-35%+2%-10%2.3×7.1%-15.4%
Shenzhen Neoway Technology 688159.SSChina$365M-45%-43%5%1.7×25.7%+33.3%
Marubun 7537.TJapan$323M+67%+2%4%0.3×-6.1%-5.9%
Esprinet PRT.MIItaly$379M-9%+5%1%0.1×2.7%-0.9%
Jetwell Computer 3147.TWOTaiwan$384M+63%+105%7%0.8×-6.9%+25.9%
STCube 052020.KSSouth Korea$308M-71%-17%-368%51.9×n/an/a
Digital China 0861.HKHong Kong$410M-14%+16%1%0.4×1.5%+2.8%
Zenitron 3028.TWTaiwan$430M-19%+76%4%0.2×n/an/a
Samji Electronics 037460.KSSouth Korea$273M-25%+88%9%0.2×n/an/a
Daitron 7609.TJapan$438M+15%+57%8%0.4×-5.0%+12.4%
Daou Data 032190.KSSouth Korea$444M-32%+130%6%n/an/an/a
Miraini 546A.TJapan$470M+11%+32%3%0.4×-1.0%+16.3%
Dingli 300050.SZChina$478M-18%+24%8%9.2×27.1%-15.4%
S.A.S. Dragon 1184.HKHong Kong$542M+16%+92%4%0.2×n/an/a
AB S.a. ABE.WAPoland$556M+3%+15%2%0.2×n/an/a
Ryoden 8084.TJapan$558M+45%+13%3%0.3×n/an/a
Shenzhen Best of Best 001298.SZChina$559M-38%+78%3%0.5×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Lanner Electronics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Edom Technology (3048.TW), Sun-Wa Technos (8137.T), Promate Electronic (6189.TW), Suzhou Chunxing Precision Mechanical (002547.SZ), Shenzhen Neoway Technology (688159.SS), Marubun (7537.T), Esprinet (PRT.MI), Jetwell Computer (3147.TWO).
Is Lanner Electronics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.1× against a peer median of 0.4×, 5th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Lanner Electronics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.0% against -9.5% for the median peer; over one year -3.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.