Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603927.SS Sinosoft Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sinosoft Co. Ltd. Class A603927.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Chinese software vendor providing core IT systems for the insurance industry.

≈ A Chinese Guidewire (insurance core systems)Momentum strong 78
Mkt cap
$1.77B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
61%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$34.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
44.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.4 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
+22 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
154 days
9 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥14.17
1D-1.2%
1W+9.9%
1M+5.0%
3M-0.3%
6M-13.8%
YTD-25.8%
1Y-33.9%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh36.9% off high

What Sinosoft does

Chinese software vendor providing core IT systems for the insurance industry.

In one line: A Chinese Guidewire (insurance core systems).

Products and services

  • Insurance core administration systems
  • Insurance IT consulting/integration

Customers

  • Insurance companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Financial/insurance software
  • Insurance core system software

What could go right

  • Insurance-industry digitalization spending

What could go wrong

  • Insurer IT-budget cyclicality

Moat: narrow (switching costs, customer qualification). Insurers' core policy/claims systems are costly and risky to replace once deployed.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Employees: 18,006

Named competitors

Sinosoft at a glance

Size Sinosoft (603927.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $1.77B, the 1409th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥14.17 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.8%, against -27.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 23.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +19.8%); the operating margin is 1.9% (peer median 9.2%).

Valuation It trades at 44.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 33.4× (7th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +22 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.4 points above its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026603927.SS 84Peer median 70
Six months, rebased to 100: Sinosoft against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sinosoft financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥5.32BCN¥6.00BCN¥6.35BCN¥6.47BCN¥6.67B
Revenue growth—-5%-2%-3%—
Gross profitCN¥1.40BCN¥1.44BCN¥1.67BCN¥2.00BCN¥1.91B
EBITDAn/aCN¥188MCN¥357MCN¥636MCN¥614M
Net incomeCN¥199MCN¥224MCN¥355MCN¥655MCN¥638M
Free cash flowCN¥673MCN¥134MCN¥1.23BCN¥159MCN¥248M
Capital expenditureCN¥29.1MCN¥20.0MCN¥17.6MCN¥36.8MCN¥32.5M
Total debtCN¥52.1MCN¥315MCN¥553MCN¥180MCN¥81.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sinosoft competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-25%0%+25%PRGSNYAX2706688692SHADOWFAX4478ADEAHACK300113CERTAISOUN301316ETORKFINTECH6880886883434443603927.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sinosoft is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×100×200×PRGSNYAX2706688692SHADOWFAX4478ADEAHACK300113CERT301316KFINTECH688088603927.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sinosoft is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%0%50%PRGSNYAX688692SHADOWFAXADEAHACK300113CERT301316ETOR6880884443603927.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sinosoft is the large dot.

Sinosoft competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (603927.SS vs GWRE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sinosoft 603927.SS$1.77B-14%-24%2%44.3×23.0%
Guidewire Software GWRE$13.3B+17%+23%10%38.5×39.4%

How Sinosoft compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sinosoft against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603927.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.0%+4.0%10th highest of 21
6-month return-13.8%-27.0%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-36.9%-41.1%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-23.5%+19.8%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin1.9%9.2%6th lowest of 21
Forward P/E44.3×33.4×7th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)23.0%23.2%7th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.9%+20.2%2nd lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+22.1 pp-1.7 pp3rd most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.4 pp+1.4 pp4th highest of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sinosoft 603927.SSChina$1.77B-14%-24%2%44.3×23.0%+0.9%
Progress Software PRGSUnited States$1.78B+46%+6%19%6.7×1.8%+17.2%
Nayax NYAXUnited States$1.78B-34%+28%5%59.1×26.9%+38.7%
Beijing Haizhi Technology 2706.HKHong Kong$1.75B-31%+23%-9%208.5×n/an/a
Wuhan Dameng Database 688692.SSChina$1.75B-28%+28%28%33.4×12.7%+23.2%
Shadowfax Technologies SHADOWFAX.NSIndia$1.79B+70%+69%10%60.0×47.0%+43.7%
freee K.K 4478.TJapan$1.72B+100%+28%3%79.1×n/an/a
TRS Information Technology 300229.SZChina$1.71B-27%-23%-76%n/an/an/a
Adeia ADEAUnited States$1.71B-47%+22%44%11.8×2.7%-13.0%
Hacksaw HACK.STSweden$1.71B-22%+21%82%8.1×-10.2%+85.9%
Hangzhou Shunwang Technology 300113.SZChina$1.70B-32%-36%26%27.1×26.2%+11.0%
Certara CERTUnited States$1.84B+91%+1%5%31.4×40.7%+11.5%
C3.ai AIUnited States$1.84B+18%-38%-198%n/an/an/a
Lyntris LYNXUnited States$1.69Bn/a+16%9%n/an/an/a
SoundHound AI SOUNUnited States$1.85B-54%+55%-96%n/an/an/a
Hydsoft Technology 301316.SZChina$1.86B-41%+19%3%158.4×46.1%+26.7%
eToro ETORUnited States$1.86B-40%+10%32%11.0×-18.5%+15.4%
Kfin Technologies KFINTECH.NSIndia$1.67B-1%+27%32%40.6×n/an/a
ArcSoft 688088.SSChina$1.87B-26%+10%12%49.1×41.3%+6.2%
Shenzhen Intellifusion Technologies 688343.SSChina$1.87B-46%-4%-52%n/an/an/a
Sansan 4443.TJapan$1.67B+65%+22%18%27.4×20.3%+27.1%

Questions

Who are Sinosoft's main competitors?
Named competitors: Guidewire Software (GWRE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Progress Software (PRGS), Nayax (NYAX), Beijing Haizhi Technology (2706.HK), Wuhan Dameng Database (688692.SS), Shadowfax Technologies (SHADOWFAX.NS), freee K.K (4478.T).
Is Sinosoft expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 44.3× against a peer median of 33.4×, 7th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +22 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Sinosoft stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.8% against -27.0% for the median peer; over one year -33.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.