Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603528.SS Duolun Technology Corporation Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Duolun Technology Corporation Ltd. Class A603528.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum leader 85
Mkt cap
$706M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
41%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$73.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
31.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-10.4 pp
WACC 5.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥6.69
1D-6.4%
1W-6.8%
1M+7.0%
3M+8.2%
6M-13.3%
YTD-30.8%
1Y-22.8%
ATR %8.4%
52w lowhigh42.2% off high

What Duolun Technology does

Employees: 1,511

Duolun Technology at a glance

Size Duolun Technology (603528.SS) is a China Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $706M, the 3040th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.69 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.3%, against +0.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 5.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.1%); the operating margin is -29.6% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 31.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.0× (5th most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.4 points below its cost of capital (5.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 99603528.SS 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Duolun Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Duolun Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥388MCN¥398MCN¥520MCN¥528MCN¥735M
Revenue growth—-23%-2%-28%—
Gross profitCN¥151MCN¥104MCN¥159MCN¥131MCN¥306M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥27.0MCN¥22.5M-CN¥2.87MCN¥195M
Net income-CN¥37.6M-CN¥29.7MCN¥6.32M-CN¥232MCN¥51.0M
Free cash flow-CN¥34.6MCN¥21.6MCN¥28.0MCN¥61.2MCN¥160M
Capital expenditureCN¥47.2MCN¥31.7MCN¥46.9MCN¥25.8MCN¥51.3M
Total debtCN¥43.2MCN¥49.9MCN¥62.0MCN¥96.9MCN¥718M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Duolun Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%AUBJSGIPH603007301398CGY688170602768848097576037783012100839300797RWSCCP3015086830300949603528.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Duolun Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0×50×100×AUBJSGIPHCGY68817060276884809757301210WLN08393007976830603528.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Duolun Technology is the large dot.

Duolun Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Duolun Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Duolun Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603528.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.0%-1.1%7th highest of 21
6-month return-13.3%+0.2%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-42.2%-27.1%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-5.9%+12.1%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin-29.6%6.1%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E31.9×16.0×5th most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-10.4 pp-1.8 pp6th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Duolun Technology 603528.SSChina$706M-13%-6%-30%31.9×n/an/a
Aubay AUB.PAFrance$707M-5%+27%9%12.9×2.5%+7.1%
Johnson Service JSG.LUnited Kingdom$704M+10%+2%11%11.0×8.3%+18.4%
IPH IPH.AXAustralia$709M+13%+1%18%9.5×-7.3%+14.6%
Danyang Syngen Intelligent Technology 603007.SSChina$702M-25%+929%-34%n/an/an/a
Ningbo Sinyuan ZM Technology 301398.SZChina$700M-5%+42%-18%n/an/an/a
Calian CGY.TOCanada$699M+22%+16%6%18.7×13.4%+12.4%
Suzhou Delphi Laser 688170.SSChina$717M-23%+20%1%78.7×n/an/a
Bengo4.com 6027.TJapan$695M+94%+19%14%51.8×18.7%+25.1%
Science Environmental Protection 688480.SSChina$694M-51%+37%10%29.7×28.2%+28.2%
Funai Soken 9757.TJapan$721M+5%+6%26%16.0×-8.3%+5.9%
Grand Sunergy Tech 603778.SSChina$686M-73%-54%-98%n/an/an/a
Wuxi Jinyang Precision Manufacturing 301210.SZChina$729M+8%+57%6%40.6×n/an/a
Worldline WLN.PAFrance$732M+9%-18%2%5.4×17.6%+10.4%
China Education 0839.HKHong Kong$680M-4%+9%32%3.0×n/an/a
NCS Testing Technology 300797.SZChina$678M-26%+15%7%25.1×22.3%+15.0%
RWS RWS.LUnited Kingdom$677M+46%-1%4%10.3×11.5%+14.2%
Credit CCP.AXAustralia$738M+37%+7%26%9.5×2.1%+11.1%
China Machinery Huanyu Certification & Inspection 301508.SZChina$738M-20%+10%21%n/a6.8%+15.4%
Msscorps 6830.TWTaiwan$744M-57%+17%3%96.2×n/an/a
Shenzhen L&A Design 300949.SZChina$744M+103%0%-28%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Duolun Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Aubay (AUB.PA), Johnson Service (JSG.L), IPH (IPH.AX), Danyang Syngen Intelligent Technology (603007.SS), Ningbo Sinyuan ZM Technology (301398.SZ), Calian (CGY.TO), Suzhou Delphi Laser (688170.SS), Bengo4.com (6027.T).
Is Duolun Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 31.9× against a peer median of 16.0×, 5th most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Duolun Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.3% against +0.2% for the median peer; over one year -22.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.