Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300949.SZ Shenzhen L&A Design Holding Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen L&A Design Holding Limited Class A300949.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum leader 100
Mkt cap
$744M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$34.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-28.3 pp
WACC 7.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
173 days
28 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥56.99
1D+12.5%
1W+37.9%
1M+135.1%
3M+167.6%
6M+103.4%
YTD+110.8%
1Y+102.7%
ATR %6.1%
52w lowhigh0.0% off high

What Shenzhen L&A Design does

Employees: 887

Shenzhen L&A Design at a glance

Size Shenzhen L&A Design (300949.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $744M, the 2933rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥56.99 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 103.4%, against -5.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.5%); the operating margin is -27.6% (peer median 2.5%).

Valuation It trades at 12.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.5× (5th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 28.3 points below its cost of capital (7.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026300949.SZ 203Peer median 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen L&A Design against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen L&A Design financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥384MCN¥433MCN¥411MCN¥477MCN¥478M
Revenue growth—+5%-14%0%—
Gross profitCN¥144MCN¥117MCN¥93.8MCN¥76.2MCN¥131M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥63.5M-CN¥120M-CN¥139M-CN¥36.5M
Net income-CN¥119M-CN¥128M-CN¥282M-CN¥177M-CN¥51.6M
Free cash flowCN¥4.13MCN¥34.0M-CN¥46.7M-CN¥160M-CN¥107M
Capital expenditureCN¥4.01MCN¥8.20MCN¥40.9MCN¥49.0MCN¥34.9M
Total debtCN¥121MCN¥157MCN¥199MCN¥205MCN¥26.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen L&A Design competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%0%+50%+100%6830GUBRA301508CCP688707WLN3012283012109757300688688170603955001207688360300949.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen L&A Design is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%0×5×10×15×6830GUBRA301508CCP688707WLN3012283012103013060029159757300688688170603955001207688360AUB603528300949.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen L&A Design is the large dot.

Shenzhen L&A Design competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen L&A Design compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen L&A Design against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300949.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+135.1%-0.1%highest of 21
6-month return+103.4%-5.6%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high0.0%-30.7%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.5%+7.5%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin-27.6%2.5%5th lowest of 21
EV / Sales12.3×3.5×5th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-28.3 pp-4.2 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen L&A Design 300949.SZChina$744M+103%0%-28%12.3×n/an/a
Msscorps 6830.TWTaiwan$744M-57%+17%3%11.1×n/an/a
Gubra A/S GUBRA.CODenmark$746M-6%-90%-72%15.7×n/an/a
China Machinery Huanyu Certification & Inspection 301508.SZChina$738M-20%+10%21%4.6×6.8%+15.4%
Credit CCP.AXAustralia$738M+37%+7%26%2.6×2.1%+11.1%
Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem 688707.SSChina$754M-40%+15%-17%3.2×3.7%+6.6%
Worldline WLN.PAFrance$732M+9%-18%2%0.7×17.6%+10.4%
SEP Analytical (Shanghai) 301228.SZChina$757M-24%+5%-9%12.3×n/an/a
Wuxi Jinyang Precision Manufacturing 301210.SZChina$729M+8%+57%6%2.5×n/an/a
Xi'an Xice Testing Technology 301306.SZChina$766M-53%+21%-27%15.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Zhongxin Fluoride Materials 002915.SZChina$767M-17%+8%2%3.9×n/an/a
Funai Soken 9757.TJapan$721M+5%+6%26%2.9×-8.3%+5.9%
Dark Horse Technology 300688.SZChina$770M+18%-32%-33%44.5×n/an/a
Suzhou Delphi Laser 688170.SSChina$717M-23%+20%1%5.1×n/an/a
Daqian Ecology & Environment 603955.SSChina$776M+21%+217%-53%14.9×n/an/a
Shandong Link Science and Technology 001207.SZChina$777M-7%+7%13%1.8×-4.6%+18.9%
Damon Technology 688360.SSChina$779M+8%+19%7%3.0×12.3%+17.1%
IPH IPH.AXAustralia$709M+13%+1%18%1.9×-7.3%+14.6%
Aubay AUB.PAFrance$707M-5%+27%9%0.9×2.5%+7.1%
Duolun Technology 603528.SSChina$706M-13%-6%-30%9.7×n/an/a
Johnson Service JSG.LUnited Kingdom$704M+10%+2%11%1.3×8.3%+18.4%

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen L&A Design's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Msscorps (6830.TW), Gubra A/S (GUBRA.CO), China Machinery Huanyu Certification & Inspection (301508.SZ), Credit (CCP.AX), Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem (688707.SS), Worldline (WLN.PA), SEP Analytical (Shanghai) (301228.SZ), Wuxi Jinyang Precision Manufacturing (301210.SZ).
Is Shenzhen L&A Design expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 12.3× against a peer median of 3.5×, 5th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen L&A Design stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +103.4% against -5.6% for the median peer; over one year +102.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.