Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600501.SS Aerosun Corporation Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Aerosun Corporation Class A600501.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles
Momentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$1.10B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
51%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$67.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-11.0 pp
WACC 9.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
171 days
26 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥17.11
1D+2.1%
1W+5.0%
1M+16.2%
3M+18.2%
6M-27.5%
YTD-43.2%
1Y-21.9%
ATR %6.3%
52w lowhigh57.2% off high

What Aerosun does

Employees: 1,827

Aerosun at a glance

Size Aerosun (600501.SS) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $1.10B, the 2128th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥17.11 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.5%, against -9.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.4%); the operating margin is -5.4% (peer median 4.1%).

Valuation It trades at 3.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.4× (7th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.0 points below its cost of capital (9.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 88600501.SS 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Aerosun against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aerosun financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.51BCN¥2.14BCN¥2.41BCN¥3.80BCN¥4.14B
Revenue growth—-11%-36%-8%—
Gross profitCN¥345MCN¥131MCN¥88.7MCN¥604MCN¥636M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥123M-CN¥308MCN¥194MCN¥203M
Net income-CN¥111M-CN¥216M-CN¥379MCN¥71.9MCN¥75.7M
Free cash flow-CN¥260MCN¥200M-CN¥1.08BCN¥237M-CN¥66.6M
Capital expenditureCN¥33.0MCN¥34.2MCN¥42.4MCN¥58.3MCN¥163M
Total debtCN¥1.06BCN¥1.18BCN¥1.32BCN¥1.01BCN¥1.34B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aerosun competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%99210022831114600686LCID1333600841000913OLECTRA3013222204PIA22010009572206SMLMAH000572600501.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aerosun is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×5×99210022831114603468600686LCID1333600841OLECTRA301322AEBI2201000957SMLMAH000572600501.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aerosun is the large dot.

Aerosun competitors and peer comparison

How Aerosun compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aerosun against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600501.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+16.2%-1.3%highest of 20
6-month return-27.5%-9.7%7th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-57.2%-37.0%6th lowest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.6%+6.4%10th highest of 20
Operating margin-5.4%4.1%5th lowest of 20
EV / Sales3.3×1.4×7th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.0 pp-2.6 pp5th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Aerosun 600501.SSChina$1.10B-28%+10%-5%3.3×n/an/a
Giant Manufacturing 9921.TWTaiwan$1.06B+29%-15%2%0.6×1.3%-3.0%
Tianrun Industry Technology 002283.SZChina$1.14B-39%+31%9%1.7×6.1%-1.7%
Brilliance China Automotive 1114.HKHong Kong$1.15B-40%+18%-30%1.9×n/an/a
Tianjin FUJI-TA Bicycle Industrial 603468.SSChina$1.19Bn/a+3%8%1.1×13.5%+4.9%
Xiamen King Long Motor 600686.SSChina$967M-42%-3%2%0.4×-1.1%+12.0%
Lucid LCIDUnited States$1.30B-48%+67%-259%4.6×n/an/a
Breton Technology 1333.HKHong Kong$915M+5%+16%-24%9.1×n/an/a
Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology 600841.SSChina$914M-39%+15%-5%0.7×2.1%-23.6%
Zhejiang Qianjiang Motorcycle 000913.SZChina$896M-16%0%2%0.8×n/an/a
Olectra Greentech OLECTRA.NSIndia$891M-19%+38%12%3.3×n/an/a
Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Tech 301322.SZChina$869M+5%+63%-3%4.3×n/an/a
China Motor 2204.TWTaiwan$867M-4%+6%4%0.9×3.7%+0.8%
Aebi Schmidt AEBIUnited States$867M-3%+49%6%0.7×11.9%n/a
Piaggio & C PIA.MIItaly$862M+24%-5%7%0.8×2.6%+2.7%
Yulon Motor 2201.TWTaiwan$860M-1%-8%8%3.9×14.9%-2.6%
Zhongtong Bus 000957.SZChina$857M-18%+6%6%0.5×-16.1%+10.7%
Sanyang Motor 2206.TWTaiwan$1.43B+8%-3%8%1.4×1.2%+9.0%
SML Mahindra SMLMAH.NSIndia$806M+35%+22%7%2.5×23.6%+36.9%
Kuen Tong Technology 7965.TWOTaiwan$796Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Haima Automobile 000572.SZChina$792M-43%-48%-27%6.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Aerosun's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Giant Manufacturing (9921.TW), Tianrun Industry Technology (002283.SZ), Brilliance China Automotive (1114.HK), Tianjin FUJI-TA Bicycle Industrial (603468.SS), Xiamen King Long Motor (600686.SS), Lucid (LCID), Breton Technology (1333.HK), Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology (600841.SS).
Is Aerosun expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.3× against a peer median of 1.4×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Aerosun stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.5% against -9.7% for the median peer; over one year -21.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.