Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1114.HK Brilliance China Automotive Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited1114.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles

Chinese automaker best known for its former joint venture with BMW (BMW Brilliance), producing BMW-brand vehicles in China.

≈ The Chinese JV partner behind BMW's China manufacturingMomentum weak 31
Mkt cap
$1.15B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.24M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-11.0 pp
WACC 9.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$1.79
1D+0.8%
1W+6.2%
1M+2.0%
3M-17.9%
6M-40.3%
YTD-55.8%
1Y-54.5%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh59.8% off high

What Brilliance China Automotive does

Chinese automaker best known for its former joint venture with BMW (BMW Brilliance), producing BMW-brand vehicles in China.

Most of its profit comes not from selling cars itself but from its share of earnings in the BMW venture, recorded as equity income instead of sales, and from dividends paid out. Since 2022 BMW has held the majority of that venture and Brilliance's share is smaller. Jinbei-brand vans and minibuses are the other operating business.

In one line: The Chinese JV partner behind BMW's China manufacturing.

Products and services

  • BMW-brand vehicle JV stake/dividends
  • Own-brand (Brilliance/Jinbei) vehicles

Customers

  • Chinese auto consumers (BMW brand via JV)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Automobiles
  • JV vehicle manufacturing

What could go right

  • China premium-vehicle market growth

What could go wrong

  • Reduced economic interest after BMW stake increase
  • China auto-market competition/price wars

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, brand). Historic JV partnership with BMW gave access to a premium brand, though BMW has since increased its own stake, diluting Brilliance's economic interest.

Headquarters: Shenyang, China · Founded: 1992 · Employees: 2,080

Named competitors

Brilliance China Automotive at a glance

Size Brilliance China Automotive (1114.HK) is a Hong Kong Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $1.15B, the 565th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$1.79 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 40.3%, against -8.7% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.0%); the operating margin is -30.2% (peer median 5.0%).

Valuation It trades at 6.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.5× (cheapest of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.0 points below its cost of capital (9.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 861114.HK 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Brilliance China Automotive against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Brilliance China Automotive financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$1.45BHK$1.28BHK$1.19BHK$1.24BHK$1.31B
Revenue growth—+8%-4%-6%—
Gross profitHK$154MHK$177MHK$210MHK$319MHK$274M
EBITDA-HK$294M-HK$270MHK$33.4M-HK$354M-HK$721M
Net incomeHK$1.20BHK$2.15BHK$3.36BHK$8.55BHK$8.31B
Free cash flown/aHK$3.68BHK$7.90B-HK$1.10BHK$1.45B
Capital expendituren/aHK$334MHK$156MHK$73.0MHK$53.1M
Total debtn/aHK$127MHK$481MHK$1.05BHK$440M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Brilliance China Automotive competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%0022836005019921LCID60068622061333600841000913OLECTRA3013226000062204PIA2201000957300201SMLMAH1114.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Brilliance China Automotive is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×20×0022839921600686600841000913OLECTRA2204AEBIPIA22010009573002011114.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Brilliance China Automotive is the large dot.

Brilliance China Automotive competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1114.HK vs 600104.SS vs 2333.HK vs 0175.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Brilliance China Automotive 1114.HK$1.15B-40%+18%-30%6.0×n/a
SAIC Motor 600104.SS$17.8B-24%-3%2%11.9×-14.7%
Great Wall Motor 2333.HK$15.7B-48%+13%2%5.9×-5.1%
Geely Auto 0175.HK$20.1B-34%+27%4%6.5×-9.3%

How Brilliance China Automotive compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Brilliance China Automotive against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1114.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.0%-3.3%5th highest of 21
6-month return-40.3%-8.7%3rd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-59.8%-37.6%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.8%+8.0%7th highest of 21
Operating margin-30.2%5.0%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E6.0×16.5×cheapest of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.0 pp-2.5 pp5th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Brilliance China Automotive 1114.HKHong Kong$1.15B-40%+18%-30%6.0×n/an/a
Tianrun Industry Technology 002283.SZChina$1.14B-39%+31%9%16.0×6.1%-1.7%
Tianjin FUJI-TA Bicycle Industrial 603468.SSChina$1.19Bn/a+3%8%n/a13.5%+4.9%
Aerosun 600501.SSChina$1.10B-28%+10%-5%n/an/an/a
Giant Manufacturing 9921.TWTaiwan$1.06B+29%-15%2%18.1×1.3%-3.0%
Lucid LCIDUnited States$1.30B-48%+67%-259%n/an/an/a
Xiamen King Long Motor 600686.SSChina$967M-42%-3%2%9.1×-1.1%+12.0%
Sanyang Motor 2206.TWTaiwan$1.43B+8%-3%8%n/a1.2%+9.0%
Breton Technology 1333.HKHong Kong$915M+5%+16%-24%n/an/an/a
Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology 600841.SSChina$914M-39%+15%-5%19.5×2.1%-23.6%
Zhejiang Qianjiang Motorcycle 000913.SZChina$896M-16%0%2%17.2×n/an/a
Olectra Greentech OLECTRA.NSIndia$891M-19%+38%12%23.7×n/an/a
Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Tech 301322.SZChina$869M+5%+63%-3%n/an/an/a
Dongfeng Automobile 600006.SSChina$1.53B-24%-5%-13%n/an/an/a
China Motor 2204.TWTaiwan$867M-4%+6%4%8.4×3.7%+0.8%
Aebi Schmidt AEBIUnited States$867M-3%+49%6%11.3×11.9%n/a
Piaggio & C PIA.MIItaly$862M+24%-5%7%17.0×2.6%+2.7%
Yulon Motor 2201.TWTaiwan$860M-1%-8%8%12.6×14.9%-2.6%
Zhongtong Bus 000957.SZChina$857M-18%+6%6%11.6×-16.1%+10.7%
Xuzhou Handler Special Vehicle 300201.SZChina$1.64B-9%+18%22%22.5×22.0%-3.3%
SML Mahindra SMLMAH.NSIndia$806M+35%+22%7%n/a23.6%+36.9%

Questions

Who are Brilliance China Automotive's main competitors?
Named competitors: SAIC Motor (600104.SS), Great Wall Motor (2333.HK), Geely Automobile (0175.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Tianrun Industry Technology (002283.SZ), Tianjin FUJI-TA Bicycle Industrial (603468.SS), Aerosun (600501.SS), Giant Manufacturing (9921.TW), Lucid (LCID), Xiamen King Long Motor (600686.SS).
Is Brilliance China Automotive expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.0× against a peer median of 16.5×, cheapest of 13 in its peer set.
How has Brilliance China Automotive stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -40.3% against -8.7% for the median peer; over one year -54.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.