Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1333.HK Breton Technology Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Breton Technology Co., Ltd. Class H1333.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles
Momentum leader 96
Mkt cap
$915M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.82M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-15.6 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$18.22
1D+10.2%
1W+11.2%
1M+3.5%
3M+68.1%
6M+5.2%
YTD-33.2%
1Y-47.2%
ATR %7.3%
52w lowhigh53.9% off high

What Breton Technology does

Employees: 346

Breton Technology at a glance

Size Breton Technology (1333.HK) is a Hong Kong Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $915M, the 615th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$18.22 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.2%, against -15.9% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is -23.6% (peer median 1.8%).

Valuation It trades at 9.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.9× (most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.6 points below its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20261333.HK 105Peer median 84
Six months, rebased to 100: Breton Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Breton Technology financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$873MHK$845MHK$689MHK$512MHK$419M
Revenue growth—+23%+34%+22%—
Gross profitHK$115MHK$85.8MHK$31.7MHK$4.59MHK$4.38M
EBITDA-HK$173M-HK$260M-HK$276M-HK$258M-HK$189M
Net income-HK$251M-HK$346M-HK$298M-HK$254M-HK$207M
Free cash flow-HK$590M-HK$549M-HK$432M-HK$408M-HK$371M
Capital expenditureHK$387MHK$401MHK$128MHK$188MHK$17.5M
Total debtn/aHK$898MHK$404MHK$218MHK$195M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Breton Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%-20%0%+20%600841000913OLECTRA3013222204600686PIA2201000957SMLMAH0005729921600375300825PSNY600501DOM72221333.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Breton Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×5×600841000913OLECTRA3013222204AEBI6006862201SMLMAH0005729921600375300825PSNY600501DOM72221333.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Breton Technology is the large dot.

Breton Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Breton Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Breton Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1333.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.5%-3.7%5th highest of 20
6-month return+5.2%-15.9%5th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-53.9%-37.0%8th lowest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.3%+6.8%7th highest of 20
Operating margin-23.6%1.8%3rd lowest of 20
EV / Sales9.1×0.9×most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-15.6 pp-3.2 pplowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Breton Technology 1333.HKHong Kong$915M+5%+16%-24%9.1×n/an/a
Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology 600841.SSChina$914M-39%+15%-5%0.7×2.1%-23.6%
Zhejiang Qianjiang Motorcycle 000913.SZChina$896M-16%0%2%0.8×n/an/a
Olectra Greentech OLECTRA.NSIndia$891M-19%+38%12%3.3×n/an/a
Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Tech 301322.SZChina$869M+5%+63%-3%4.3×n/an/a
China Motor 2204.TWTaiwan$867M-4%+6%4%0.9×3.7%+0.8%
Aebi Schmidt AEBIUnited States$867M-3%+49%6%0.7×11.9%n/a
Xiamen King Long Motor 600686.SSChina$967M-42%-3%2%0.4×-1.1%+12.0%
Piaggio & C PIA.MIItaly$862M+24%-5%7%0.8×2.6%+2.7%
Yulon Motor 2201.TWTaiwan$860M-1%-8%8%3.9×14.9%-2.6%
Zhongtong Bus 000957.SZChina$857M-18%+6%6%0.5×-16.1%+10.7%
SML Mahindra SMLMAH.NSIndia$806M+35%+22%7%2.5×23.6%+36.9%
Kuen Tong Technology 7965.TWOTaiwan$796Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Haima Automobile 000572.SZChina$792M-43%-48%-27%6.2×n/an/a
Giant Manufacturing 9921.TWTaiwan$1.06B+29%-15%2%0.6×1.3%-3.0%
Hanma Technology 600375.SSChina$786M-39%+38%0%0.7×11.1%+0.5%
IAT Automobile Technology 300825.SZChina$786M+9%+7%-8%4.7×n/an/a
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Sponsored ADR PSNYUnited States$778M-79%+18%-47%2.0×n/an/a
Aerosun 600501.SSChina$1.10B-28%+10%-5%3.3×n/an/a
Dometic DOM.STSweden$755M-29%-6%-13%0.9×3.4%+5.4%
Nissan Shatai 7222.TJapan$747M-4%+15%4%0.1×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Breton Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology (600841.SS), Zhejiang Qianjiang Motorcycle (000913.SZ), Olectra Greentech (OLECTRA.NS), Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Tech (301322.SZ), China Motor (2204.TW), Aebi Schmidt (AEBI), Xiamen King Long Motor (600686.SS), Piaggio & C (PIA.MI).
Is Breton Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 9.1× against a peer median of 0.9×, most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Breton Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.2% against -15.9% for the median peer; over one year -47.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.