Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002283.SZ Tianrun Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tianrun Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Class A002283.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles

Chinese maker of engine crankshafts and other auto-engine components.

Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$1.14B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$24.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.6 pp
WACC 9.9%
Hurdle
+8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥6.84
1D-5.0%
1W-1.4%
1M-12.0%
3M-20.9%
6M-39.1%
YTD+9.6%
1Y+7.0%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh48.3% off high

What Tianrun Industry Technology does

Chinese maker of engine crankshafts and other auto-engine components.

Sells crankshafts, the rotating shaft that turns a piston's motion into drive, in volume to engine makers under annual supply agreements, largely for commercial-vehicle engines, so output tracks heavy-truck production more than passenger cars.

Products and services

  • Crankshafts
  • Other engine components

Customers

  • Engine/vehicle makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Auto parts
  • Engine components
  • Crankshafts

What could go right

  • Domestic auto/engine production

What could go wrong

  • Shift to EVs reducing engine-part demand

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Precision engine-component maker qualified into automaker supply chains.

Headquarters: China · Employees: 3,931

Tianrun Industry Technology at a glance

Size Tianrun Industry Technology (002283.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $1.14B, the 2058th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.84 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.1%, against -8.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 30.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.0%); the operating margin is 9.3% (peer median 3.0%).

Valuation It trades at 16.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (7th cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.6 points below its cost of capital (9.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86002283.SZ 55
Six months, rebased to 100: Tianrun Industry Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tianrun Industry Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥4.90BCN¥4.05BCN¥3.60BCN¥3.99BCN¥3.12B
Revenue growth—+12%-10%+28%—
Gross profitCN¥1.33BCN¥830MCN¥716MCN¥856MCN¥591M
EBITDAn/aCN¥746MCN¥681MCN¥779MCN¥566M
Net incomeCN¥468MCN¥368MCN¥333MCN¥391MCN¥204M
Free cash flowCN¥440MCN¥595MCN¥303MCN¥620MCN¥162M
Capital expenditureCN¥268MCN¥313MCN¥122MCN¥272MCN¥380M
Total debtCN¥1.46BCN¥1.05BCN¥1.18BCN¥1.40BCN¥1.57B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tianrun Industry Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%11146005019921LCID60068613336008412206000913OLECTRA3013222204PIA2201000957600006SMLMAH300201002283.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tianrun Industry Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×20×11149921600686600841000913OLECTRA2204AEBIPIA2201000957300201002283.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tianrun Industry Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%6034689921600686600841220622042201000957SMLMAH300201002283.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tianrun Industry Technology is the large dot.

Tianrun Industry Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Tianrun Industry Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tianrun Industry Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002283.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.0%-0.5%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-39.1%-8.7%4th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-48.3%-37.6%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+30.5%+8.0%5th highest of 21
Operating margin9.3%3.0%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E16.0×14.8×7th cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.1%3.1%6th most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)-1.7%+2.7%5th lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+7.7 pp+2.9 pp5th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.6 pp-2.7 pp9th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tianrun Industry Technology 002283.SZChina$1.14B-39%+31%9%16.0×6.1%-1.7%
Brilliance China Automotive 1114.HKHong Kong$1.15B-40%+18%-30%6.0×n/an/a
Aerosun 600501.SSChina$1.10B-28%+10%-5%n/an/an/a
Tianjin FUJI-TA Bicycle Industrial 603468.SSChina$1.19Bn/a+3%8%n/a13.5%+4.9%
Giant Manufacturing 9921.TWTaiwan$1.06B+29%-15%2%18.1×1.3%-3.0%
Lucid LCIDUnited States$1.30B-48%+67%-259%n/an/an/a
Xiamen King Long Motor 600686.SSChina$967M-42%-3%2%9.1×-1.1%+12.0%
Breton Technology 1333.HKHong Kong$915M+5%+16%-24%n/an/an/a
Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology 600841.SSChina$914M-39%+15%-5%19.5×2.1%-23.6%
Sanyang Motor 2206.TWTaiwan$1.43B+8%-3%8%n/a1.2%+9.0%
Zhejiang Qianjiang Motorcycle 000913.SZChina$896M-16%0%2%17.2×n/an/a
Olectra Greentech OLECTRA.NSIndia$891M-19%+38%12%23.7×n/an/a
Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Tech 301322.SZChina$869M+5%+63%-3%n/an/an/a
China Motor 2204.TWTaiwan$867M-4%+6%4%8.4×3.7%+0.8%
Aebi Schmidt AEBIUnited States$867M-3%+49%6%11.3×11.9%n/a
Piaggio & C PIA.MIItaly$862M+24%-5%7%17.0×2.6%+2.7%
Yulon Motor 2201.TWTaiwan$860M-1%-8%8%12.6×14.9%-2.6%
Zhongtong Bus 000957.SZChina$857M-18%+6%6%11.6×-16.1%+10.7%
Dongfeng Automobile 600006.SSChina$1.53B-24%-5%-13%n/an/an/a
SML Mahindra SMLMAH.NSIndia$806M+35%+22%7%n/a23.6%+36.9%
Xuzhou Handler Special Vehicle 300201.SZChina$1.64B-9%+18%22%22.5×22.0%-3.3%

Questions

Which companies are Tianrun Industry Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Brilliance China Automotive (1114.HK), Aerosun (600501.SS), Tianjin FUJI-TA Bicycle Industrial (603468.SS), Giant Manufacturing (9921.TW), Lucid (LCID), Xiamen King Long Motor (600686.SS), Breton Technology (1333.HK), Shanghai New Power Automotive Technology (600841.SS).
Is Tianrun Industry Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.0× against a peer median of 14.8×, 7th cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Tianrun Industry Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.1% against -8.7% for the median peer; over one year +7.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.