Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600125.SS China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co., Ltd Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co., Ltd Class A600125.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Railroads

Provides rail container transport, leasing and intermodal logistics services within China's state railway freight network.

≈ A Chinese rail-intermodal logistics armMomentum strong 73
Mkt cap
$1.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.98M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+10.2 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
147 days
2 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥5.40
1D+0.4%
1W+5.3%
1M+2.3%
3M-4.6%
6M-12.1%
YTD-16.1%
1Y-17.1%
ATR %1.8%
52w lowhigh24.8% off high

What China Railway Tielong Container Logistics does

Provides rail container transport, leasing and intermodal logistics services within China's state railway freight network.

In one line: A Chinese rail-intermodal logistics arm.

Products and services

  • Container rail transport
  • Container leasing
  • Intermodal logistics services

Customers

  • Freight forwarders and shippers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Logistics
  • Rail container transport/leasing

What could go right

  • Rail freight modal-shift policy support

What could go wrong

  • Truck freight competition
  • Rail capacity allocation by state operator

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). Operates within China's state rail network with an established container fleet and terminals.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Employees: 2,198

Named competitors

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics at a glance

Size China Railway Tielong Container Logistics (600125.SS) is a China Industrials company (Railroads) with a market value of $1.06B, the 2193rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥5.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 12.1%, against +0.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 13 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.3%); the operating margin is 6.8% (peer median 11.9%).

Valuation It trades at 11.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.5× (6th cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -21% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.2 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101600125.SS 88
Six months, rebased to 100: China Railway Tielong Container Logistics against the median of its 12 peers (local-currency closes).

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥11.3BCN¥11.5BCN¥13.0BCN¥14.7BCN¥12.0B
Revenue growth—-12%-11%+22%—
Gross profitCN¥1.39BCN¥973MCN¥901MCN¥846MCN¥763M
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.23BCN¥1.01BCN¥1.04BCN¥821M
Net incomeCN¥539MCN¥525MCN¥382MCN¥471MCN¥337M
Free cash flowCN¥1.14BCN¥473MCN¥439M-CN¥24.9MCN¥719M
Capital expenditureCN¥195MCN¥224MCN¥180MCN¥166MCN¥117M
Total debtCN¥549MCN¥591MCN¥853MCN¥877MCN¥962M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%0%+10%000008JFN904590069008BVZN05259142CONCOR3007899007600125.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Railway Tielong Container Logistics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%10×15×20×25×JFN9045900690080525CONCOR30078990019007600125.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Railway Tielong Container Logistics is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%000008JFNCONCOR600125.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. China Railway Tielong Container Logistics is the large dot.

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600125.SS vs 601333.SS vs 601598.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China Railway Tielong Container Logistics 600125.SS$1.06B-12%-2%7%11.5×-21.0%
Guangshen Railway 601333.SS$3.16B+1%+5%6%16.3×-14.9%
Sinotrans 601598.SS$6.74B+18%-1%0%14.8×4.3%

How China Railway Tielong Container Logistics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Railway Tielong Container Logistics against its 12 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600125.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.3%+2.3%7th highest of 13
6-month return-12.1%+0.6%4th lowest of 13
Distance from 52-week high-24.8%-13.3%3rd lowest of 13
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.8%+4.3%4th lowest of 13
Operating margin6.8%11.9%4th lowest of 13
Forward P/E11.5×12.5×6th cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-21.0%8.7%least demanding of 4
Growth delivered (Del g)-5.4%+7.2%lowest of 4
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.6 pp+6.6 pp2nd least demanding of 4
ROIC minus cost of capital+10.2 pp-1.4 pphighest of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Railway Tielong Container Logistics 600125.SSChina$1.06B-12%-2%7%11.5×-21.0%-5.4%
China High-Speed Railway Technology 000008.SZChina$919M-14%-11%-19%n/a8.7%+2.1%
Jungfraubahn JFN.SWSwitzerland$1.81B+1%-4%21%22.2×4.4%+22.3%
Keihan 9045.TJapan$2.15B+3%+10%15%11.5×n/an/a
Keikyu 9006.TJapan$2.73B+2%+4%11%13.4×n/an/a
Keio 9008.TJapan$2.80B+3%+10%10%10.5×n/an/a
BVZ BVZN.SWSwitzerland$363M0%+6%17%n/an/an/a
Guangshen Railway 0525.HKHong Kong$3.12B-9%+5%6%9.6×n/an/a
Kyushu Railway 9142.TJapan$3.53B0%+5%14%11.3×n/an/a
Container Corporation of India CONCOR.NSIndia$3.55B-16%+1%14%25.4×33.8%+7.2%
Chengdu Tangyuan Electric 300789.SZChina$315M-36%-45%-40%16.4×n/an/a
Tobu Railway 9001.TJapan$3.58B+3%+5%11%10.0×n/an/a
Odakyu Electric Railway 9007.TJapan$3.80B+11%+3%13%15.1×n/an/a

Questions

Who are China Railway Tielong Container Logistics's main competitors?
Named competitors: Guangshen Railway (601333.SS), Sinotrans (601598.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China High-Speed Railway Technology (000008.SZ), Jungfraubahn (JFN.SW), Keihan (9045.T), Keikyu (9006.T), Keio (9008.T), BVZ (BVZN.SW).
Is China Railway Tielong Container Logistics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.5× against a peer median of 12.5×, 6th cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -21% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has China Railway Tielong Container Logistics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -12.1% against +0.6% for the median peer; over one year -17.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.