Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5020.T Eneos Holdings IncOpen in the cockpit ↗

Eneos Holdings Inc5020.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Energy›Oil Refining/Marketing

Japan's largest oil refiner and gas-station operator, also involved in petrochemicals and renewable energy.

≈ Japan's ExxonMobil/Marathon Petroleum (refining/marketing)Momentum weak 25
Mkt cap
$19.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$87.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.5 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
-20 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,174
1D-8.2%
1W-18.5%
1M-14.9%
3M-9.3%
6M-11.1%
YTD+7.3%
1Y+26.4%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh23.5% off high

What Eneos does

Japan's largest oil refiner and gas-station operator, also involved in petrochemicals and renewable energy.

Profit depends on the gap between crude cost and fuel prices at its refineries, plus a retail network of service stations under the ENEOS name; petrochemicals and oil-and-gas production add income. Japanese fuel demand is in long decline. The group was formed by mergers of Japanese oil refiners, and its advanced-materials business was listed separately in 2025.

In one line: Japan's ExxonMobil/Marathon Petroleum (refining/marketing).

Products and services

  • Petroleum refining/fuel retail
  • Petrochemicals
  • Renewable energy (solar, wind development)

Customers

  • Retail drivers via gas stations
  • Industrial/petrochemical customers
  • Power/utility customers (via renewables)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Oil refining and marketing
  • Refined fuels, gas stations…

What could go right

  • Refining margin cycles
  • Diversification into renewables reducing fossil dependence

What could go wrong

  • Structural decline in Japanese gasoline demand (EVs, shrinking population)
  • Oil-price volatility

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). Largest refining capacity and widest fuel-retail network in Japan, built through decades of consolidation.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Employees: 34,099

Named competitors

Eneos at a glance

Size Eneos (5020.T) is a Japan Energy company (Oil Refining/Marketing) with a market value of $19.8B, the 83rd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,174 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.1%, against -2.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.9%); the operating margin is 6.5% (peer median 9.4%).

Valuation It trades at 6.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 6.1× (6th cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -20 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points above its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1005020.T 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Eneos against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Eneos financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥12.3T¥11.8T¥12.3T¥12.3T¥15.0T
Revenue growth—-5%0%-18%—
Gross profit¥1.68T¥1.22T¥1.10T¥1.16T¥872B
EBITDA¥1.13T¥680B¥608B¥651B¥607B
Net income¥688B¥259B¥226B¥288B¥144B
Free cash flow¥234B¥380B¥294B¥706B-¥403B
Capital expenditure¥314B¥293B¥348B¥375B¥347B
Total debt¥2.39T¥2.62T¥2.68T¥3.27T¥3.56T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Eneos competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%DINONESTE6505BPCL096770PKN5019010950HINDPETROPBFALD5020.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Eneos is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×DINONESTE6505BPCL096770PKN5019010950PBFALD5020.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Eneos is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%DINONESTE6505BPCLPKN5019HINDPETROALD5020.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Eneos is the large dot.

Eneos competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (5020.T vs 5019.T vs 5021.T vs XOM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Eneos 5020.T$19.8B-11%+2%7%6.7×-10.6%
Idemitsu Kosan 5019.T$9.54B-9%-3%6%7.1×-12.8%
Cosmo Energy 5021.T$3.74B-10%0%9%7.0×-18.5%
ExxonMobil XOM$677B+16%+21%14%11.8×-5.9%
Marathon Petroleum MPC$101B+53%+32%12%5.1×-16.8%

How Eneos compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Eneos against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5020.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.9%-18.1%4th highest of 12
6-month return-11.1%-2.4%3rd lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-23.5%-24.9%4th highest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.3%+16.9%4th lowest of 12
Operating margin6.5%9.4%5th lowest of 12
Forward P/E6.7×6.1×6th cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.6%-7.7%4th least demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.0%+14.0%2nd lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-19.5 pp-20.8 pp5th least demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.5 pp+11.5 pp3rd lowest of 12
EV / EBITDA4.8×4.8×4th most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×0.7×5th most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Eneos 5020.TJapan$19.8B-11%+2%7%6.7×-10.6%+9.0%
HF Sinclair DINOUnited States$16.7B+34%+29%14%5.0×-20.0%+19.1%
Neste NESTE.HEFinland$23.6B-5%+15%14%6.9×-6.5%+10.0%
Formosa Petrochemical Corporati 6505.TWTaiwan$24.7B+58%+2%10%10.4×-7.7%+8.6%
Bharat Petroleum BPCL.NSIndia$14.7B+4%+22%3%23.1×5.7%+14.5%
SK Innovation 096770.KSSouth Korea$13.4B-25%+26%9%4.5×n/an/a
ORLEN Spolka Akcyjna PKN.WAPoland$38.5B-10%+2%13%5.2×-7.6%+25.5%
Idemitsu Kosan 5019.TJapan$9.54B-9%-3%6%7.1×-12.8%+12.2%
S-Oil 010950.KSSouth Korea$9.00B-21%+19%10%3.5×n/an/a
Hindustan Petroleum HINDPETRO.NSIndia$8.67B-2%+17%0%n/a24.7%+13.6%
PBF Energy PBFUnited States$8.16B+65%+32%8%2.6×n/an/a
Ampol ALD.AXAustralia$5.95B+6%+15%6%10.8×-14.0%+15.4%

Questions

Who are Eneos's main competitors?
Named competitors: Idemitsu Kosan (5019.T), Cosmo Energy Holdings (5021.T), ExxonMobil (XOM), Marathon Petroleum (MPC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes HF Sinclair (DINO), Neste (NESTE.HE), Formosa Petrochemical Corporati (6505.TW), Bharat Petroleum (BPCL.NS), SK Innovation (096770.KS), ORLEN Spolka Akcyjna (PKN.WA).
Is Eneos expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.7× against a peer median of 6.1×, 6th cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -11% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -20 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Eneos stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.1% against -2.4% for the median peer; over one year +26.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.