Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3234.TWO Truelight CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Truelight Corporation3234.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Semiconductors
Momentum leader 83
Mkt cap
$443M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
91%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$16.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-27.5 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
131 days
17 Mar 2027
Close · TWDNT$115.00
1D-6.5%
1W-24.1%
1M-36.1%
3M+32.2%
6M+8.0%
YTD+140.8%
1Y+258.8%
ATR %11.6%
52w lowhigh47.7% off high

What Truelight does

No business profile yet.

Truelight at a glance

Size Truelight (3234.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $443M, the 489th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$115.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.0%, against -21.4% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.0%); the operating margin is -23.6% (peer median 2.1%).

Valuation It trades at 20.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.7× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 27.5 points below its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263234.TWO 101Peer median 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Truelight against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Truelight financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$703MNT$683MNT$574MNT$630MNT$990M
Revenue growth—+19%-9%-36%—
Gross profitNT$74.3MNT$92.0MNT$22.2MNT$21.6MNT$253M
EBITDA-NT$91.1M-NT$78.7M-NT$171M-NT$187MNT$125M
Net income-NT$156M-NT$156M-NT$239M-NT$390M-NT$26.2M
Free cash flow-NT$145M-NT$85.3M-NT$120M-NT$170MNT$137M
Capital expenditureNT$61.3MNT$52.6MNT$67.3MNT$38.3MNT$16.9M
Total debtNT$400MNT$151MNT$224MNT$464MNT$721M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Truelight competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%785369206036286882592340613868862069621014906855497149770590906443031330ALSEMINDI6884582817403234.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Truelight is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×10×20×785369206036286882592340613868862069621014906855497149770590906882166443031330ALSEMINDI6884582817403234.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Truelight is the large dot.

Truelight competitors and peer comparison

How Truelight compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Truelight against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3234.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-36.1%-24.3%4th lowest of 21
6-month return+8.0%-21.4%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-47.7%-49.5%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.1%+7.0%10th highest of 21
Operating margin-23.6%2.1%5th lowest of 20
EV / Sales20.9×3.7×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-27.5 pp-3.9 pp3rd lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Truelight 3234.TWOTaiwan$443M+8%+10%-24%20.9×n/an/a
Cheng Mei Instrument Technology 7853.TWOTaiwan$442M-20%+2%-46%37.8×n/an/a
Phoenix Pioneer Technology 6920.TWOTaiwan$442M-44%+32%-10%8.8×n/an/a
Clenergy Technology 603628.SSChina$441M-13%-21%4%2.3×13.0%+18.4%
Triductor Technology (Suzhou) 688259.SSChina$446M-30%-32%-16%8.3×55.4%+11.6%
Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor 2340.TWTaiwan$448M-19%0%-26%4.2×n/an/a
Anpec Electronics 6138.TWOTaiwan$449M-20%+18%19%1.6×-1.6%+6.8%
Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics 688620.SSChina$449M-11%+70%1%3.2×n/an/a
ITH 6962.TWTaiwan$436M-17%-3%2%0.6×1.4%-4.9%
S & S Tech 101490.KSSouth Korea$451M-71%+20%20%2.2×n/an/a
Japan Electronic Materials 6855.TJapan$451M-31%+38%26%1.6×10.9%+9.7%
IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) 4971.TWOTaiwan$452M-60%+31%19%12.9×n/an/a
PCL Technologies 4977.TWTaiwan$454M-23%-26%2%13.1×n/an/a
MiCo 059090.KSSouth Korea$431M-18%+60%6%1.6×n/an/a
China Chippacking Technology 688216.SSChina$463M-14%+56%2%3.3×20.2%+7.0%
TSEC 6443.TWTaiwan$423M-31%-55%-122%11.6×n/an/a
SAMT 031330.KSSouth Korea$464M-9%+104%8%0.2×n/an/a
SEMCO Technologies ALSEM.PAFrance$421M-34%+7%n/a9.8×26.2%n/a
indie Semiconductor INDIUnited States$420M-58%+6%-62%3.2×n/an/a
Maxic Technology 688458.SSChina$468M-14%+7%-14%4.0×n/an/a
Lake Materials 281740.KSSouth Korea$468M-58%+6%11%5.4×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Truelight's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Cheng Mei Instrument Technology (7853.TWO), Phoenix Pioneer Technology (6920.TWO), Clenergy Technology (603628.SS), Triductor Technology (Suzhou) (688259.SS), Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor (2340.TW), Anpec Electronics (6138.TWO), Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics (688620.SS), ITH (6962.TW).
Is Truelight expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 20.9× against a peer median of 3.7×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Truelight stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.0% against -21.4% for the median peer; over one year +258.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.