Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 031330.KS SAMT Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

SAMT Co., Ltd.031330.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Semiconductors
Momentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$464M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.72M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+16.6 pp
WACC 6.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩6,460
1D-7.7%
1W-12.9%
1M-24.9%
3M-27.7%
6M-8.6%
YTD+55.7%
1Y+78.2%
ATR %7.2%
52w lowhigh67.6% off high

What SAMT does

Employees: 113

SAMT at a glance

Size SAMT (031330.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $464M, the 349th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩6,460 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.6%, against -21.4% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 103.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.4%); the operating margin is 8.5% (peer median 2.2%).

Valuation It trades at 0.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.2× (cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 16.6 points above its cost of capital (6.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026031330.KS 87Peer median 79
Six months, rebased to 100: SAMT against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

SAMT financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩6.45T₩3.76T₩2.89T₩2.15T₩2.54T
Revenue growth—+30%+35%-16%—
Gross profit₩599B₩160B₩111B₩90.8B₩117B
EBITDA₩550B₩116B₩70.1B₩55.6B₩80.9B
Net income₩396B₩75.8B₩54.4B₩32.9B₩57.8B
Free cash flow-₩499B-₩121B-₩142B₩131B-₩4.25B
Capital expenditure₩10.1B₩378M₩802M₩7.52B₩34.6B
Total debt₩1.03T₩462B₩275B₩98.9B₩183B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SAMT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%-40%-20%68821668845828174080644977497168551014906886206138234068825930031732347853692035926036286887216962031330.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SAMT is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×10×20×68821668845828174080644977497168551014906886206138234068825932347853692035926036286887216962031330.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. SAMT is the large dot.

SAMT competitors and peer comparison

How SAMT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SAMT against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure031330.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-24.9%-25.3%11th highest of 21
6-month return-8.6%-21.4%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-67.6%-48.2%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+103.9%+11.4%highest of 21
Operating margin8.5%2.2%7th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.2×4.2×cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+16.6 pp-4.7 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA2.7×17.1×cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×-1.2×4th most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
SAMT 031330.KSSouth Korea$464M-9%+104%8%0.2×n/an/a
China Chippacking Technology 688216.SSChina$463M-14%+56%2%3.3×20.2%+7.0%
Maxic Technology 688458.SSChina$468M-14%+7%-14%4.0×n/an/a
Lake Materials 281740.KSSouth Korea$468M-58%+6%11%5.4×n/an/a
Contrel Technology 8064.TWOTaiwan$469M-33%+28%15%4.2×18.2%-5.5%
PCL Technologies 4977.TWTaiwan$454M-23%-26%2%13.1×n/an/a
IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) 4971.TWOTaiwan$452M-60%+31%19%12.9×n/an/a
Japan Electronic Materials 6855.TJapan$451M-31%+38%26%1.6×10.9%+9.7%
S & S Tech 101490.KSSouth Korea$451M-71%+20%20%2.2×n/an/a
Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics 688620.SSChina$449M-11%+70%1%3.2×n/an/a
Anpec Electronics 6138.TWOTaiwan$449M-20%+18%19%1.6×-1.6%+6.8%
Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor 2340.TWTaiwan$448M-19%0%-26%4.2×n/an/a
Triductor Technology (Suzhou) 688259.SSChina$446M-30%-32%-16%8.3×55.4%+11.6%
Jiawei Renewable Energy 300317.SZChina$484M-24%+16%-21%6.0×n/an/a
Truelight 3234.TWOTaiwan$443M+8%+10%-24%20.9×n/an/a
Cheng Mei Instrument Technology 7853.TWOTaiwan$442M-20%+2%-46%37.8×n/an/a
Phoenix Pioneer Technology 6920.TWOTaiwan$442M-44%+32%-10%8.8×n/an/a
Raydium Semiconductor 3592.TWTaiwan$488M-10%+6%5%0.7×0.8%+9.2%
Clenergy Technology 603628.SSChina$441M-13%-21%4%2.3×13.0%+18.4%
ShenZhen Longtu Photomask Co., Ltd.Class A 688721.SSChina$492M-31%+13%5%12.0×n/an/a
ITH 6962.TWTaiwan$436M-17%-3%2%0.6×1.4%-4.9%

Questions

Which companies are SAMT's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: China Chippacking Technology (688216.SS), Maxic Technology (688458.SS), Lake Materials (281740.KS), Contrel Technology (8064.TWO), PCL Technologies (4977.TW), IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) (4971.TWO), Japan Electronic Materials (6855.T), S & S Tech (101490.KS).
Is SAMT expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.2× against a peer median of 4.2×, cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has SAMT stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.6% against -21.4% for the median peer; over one year +78.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.